Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: "Max" <iprmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 06:15:11 -0700
[...]
The simpler version has a bug, as has already been
explained. Now: Is that bug an artifact of the simplification
process, or is it also present in the original?
If you refer to the undefined behaviour, yes, I have tried to test the
code dropping out eps. I have got a different point list but it is
still wrong. As I have already explained above, I have the possibility
to visually check if the point list is correct or not.
The line
return 0.;
was just a typing error here.
Bye
Max
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- References:
- qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: Max
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: Duncan Muirhead
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: Max
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- From: Eric Sosman
- qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- Prev by Date: Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface
- Next by Date: Re: Integer Promotion?
- Previous by thread: Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- Next by thread: Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
