Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:19:37 +0000
Keith Thompson said:
<snip>
I wouldn't avoid "new" and "class" in C code; C++ is a different
language. But C99 is a new version of the same language, and it just
might catch on.
Yes, it might, and so of course I /do/ avoid clashes in C90 code. I might
/think/ about using restrict as an identifier, but I don't actually do it.
(In fact, a few years ago I discovered that I had done precisely that, in a
program written before I'd ever heard of C99. Although that program has
never encountered a C99 compiler, I changed the code anyway. ISTR that I
used "constrain" instead.
But C0X people should bear in mind that our namespace is already crowded
enough, and should invade it no more.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- References:
- So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Mark F. Haigh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Harald van Dijk
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- From: Keith Thompson
- So what Standard are we working off?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?]
- Next by Date: Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- Previous by thread: Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- Next by thread: Re: So what Standard are we working off?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|