comp.lang.c
- Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?,
ballpointpenthief
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?,
Richard Heathfield
- Application Reading Itself,
ReaperUnreal
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Ed Prochak
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Malcolm
- String Character Conversion,
Jayson Davis
- Re: String Character Conversion,
Eric Sosman
- Re: String Character Conversion,
Jayson Davis
- Re: String Character Conversion, Eric Sosman
- Re: String Character Conversion, Jayson Davis
- Re: String Character Conversion,
Jayson Davis
- Re: String Character Conversion, Jack Klein
- Re: String Character Conversion,
Eric Sosman
- same name global variable multi-files,
quickcur
- Re: same name global variable multi-files, Richard Heathfield
- Safe use of unions,
dingoatemydonut
- Re: Safe use of unions, Jack Klein
- new/delete,
c language
- Re: new/delete, Thomas J. Gritzan
- Re: new/delete, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: new/delete, John Bode
- Re: new/delete, Richard Heathfield
- Printing string constants, Ross
- Scope of specifier extern,
Christian Christmann
- Re: Scope of specifier extern, pete
- Re: Scope of specifier extern,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Scope of specifier extern,
Christian Christmann
- Re: Scope of specifier extern, Tom St Denis
- Re: Scope of specifier extern,
Christian Christmann
- Re: Scope of specifier extern, Chris Torek
- Linked list, no out put,help,
asm_fool
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help, Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help,
pete
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help, pete
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help, asm_fool
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help, D. Power
- void vs void* (philosophical question),
Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Mark F. Haigh
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Ian Malone
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Ben C
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Harald van Dijk
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Richard Heathfield
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), pete
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Thomas J. Gritzan
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Chris Torek
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Kenneth Brody
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Chris Torek
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Keith Thompson
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Keith Thompson
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Kenneth Brody
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question),
Mark F. Haigh
- Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Steffen Loringer
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Richard Bos
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Steffen Loringer
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Chris Dollin
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, pete
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, pete
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, pete
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Sven Fülster
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Steffen Loringer
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Keith Thompson
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short,
Richard Bos
- doubts,
ran
- Re: doubts, Suman
- Re: doubts, santosh
- Re: doubts, Richard Heathfield
- Re: doubts, Malcolm
- Time compatibility issue between Java and C,
Adi
- Re: Time compatibility issue between Java and C, Walter Roberson
- Re: Time compatibility issue between Java and C, Nelu
- So what Standard are we working off?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Sjouke Burry
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Peter Nilsson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Joe Wright
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Rouben Rostamian
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark F. Haigh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ian Collins
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
pete
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, pete
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Suman
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Bos
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, pete
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Tom St Denis
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Walter Banks
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Default User
- #warning preprocessor command,
ddehterov
- Re: #warning preprocessor command,
Robert Gamble
- Re: #warning preprocessor command, ddehterov
- Re: #warning preprocessor command,
Keith Thompson
- Re: #warning preprocessor command,
Robert Gamble
- Re: #warning preprocessor command, Keith Thompson
- Re: #warning preprocessor command, Skarmander
- Re: #warning preprocessor command, Keith Thompson
- Re: #warning preprocessor command,
Robert Gamble
- Re: #warning preprocessor command,
Robert Gamble
- Re: extern keyword, Frederick Gotham
- OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Seeker
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Seeker
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Ian Collins
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Flash Gordon
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Seeker
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Chris Dollin
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Seeker
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Robert Gamble
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
santosh
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Skarmander
- Re: [OT] Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Morris Dovey
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Mark F. Haigh
- Message not available
- Re: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Seeker
- Re: [OT]Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms, Morris Dovey
- Re: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Seeker
- Re: OT: Good introduction to CPU/Memory terms,
Richard Heathfield
- Casting nonscalar to the same type.,
crook
- Re: Casting nonscalar to the same type.,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Casting nonscalar to the same type., Eric Sosman
- Re: Casting nonscalar to the same type., Ben Pfaff
- Re: Casting nonscalar to the same type., Keith Thompson
- Re: Casting nonscalar to the same type.,
Richard Heathfield
- About header files,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: About header files,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: About header files,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: About header files, Robert Gamble
- Re: About header files, Eric Sosman
- Re: About header files,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: About header files,
Richard Heathfield
- 64 bit portability, size_t, and printf format strings, dank
- Preprocessing,
tatto0_2000
- Re: Preprocessing, Eric Sosman
- Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
jamihuq
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Ian Malone
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
pete
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, pete
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Robert Gamble
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Flash Gordon
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Robert Gamble
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, pete
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Robert Gamble
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
Chris Torek
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Eric Sosman
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, pete
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Chris Torek
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Keith Thompson
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, pete
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp,
SM Ryan
- Re: Need to implement strdup, strnicmp and stricmp, Richard Heathfield
- Problems with typedef,
Ian Bush
- Re: Problems with typedef,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Problems with typedef, Lew Pitcher
- Re: Problems with typedef,
Ian Bush
- Re: Problems with typedef, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Problems with typedef, Eric Sosman
- Re: Problems with typedef, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Problems with typedef, Robert Gamble
- Re: Problems with typedef,
John Smith
- Re: Problems with typedef,
Chris Torek
- Re: Problems with typedef, John Smith
- Re: Problems with typedef, Chris Torek
- Re: Problems with typedef,
Chris Torek
- Re: Problems with typedef, goose
- Re: Problems with typedef, pete
- Re: Problems with typedef, Ian Bush
- Re: Problems with typedef,
Roberto Waltman
- Need help to save strings from a file to a structure,
Dadio
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Chris Dollin
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Morris Dovey
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure,
bert
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure,
Dadio
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Dadio
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Clever Monkey
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Morris Dovey
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Dadio
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Need help to save strings from a file to a structure,
Dadio
- which is faster?,
Sunil Varma
- Re: which is faster?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: which is faster?, Richard Tobin
- Re: which is faster?, Chris Dollin
- Re: which is faster?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: which is faster?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: which is faster?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: which is faster?, pete
- Re: which is faster?,
Richard Heathfield
- Array elements,
Kumar
- Re: Array elements,
Chris Dollin
- Re: Array elements,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Array elements, Chris Dollin
- Re: Array elements, pete
- Re: Array elements, Keith Thompson
- Re: Array elements,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Array elements, santosh
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Array elements, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Array elements,
Chris Dollin
- Binary storage of string constants,
Ross
- Re: Binary storage of string constants,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Binary storage of string constants,
Chris Dollin
- Re: Binary storage of string constants, Ross
- Re: Binary storage of string constants, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Binary storage of string constants, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Binary storage of string constants,
Chris Dollin
- Re: Binary storage of string constants, Skarmander
- Re: Binary storage of string constants,
Richard Heathfield
- need help with a new site,
da404LewZer
- Re: need help with a new site, Joshua Shinavier
- Re: need help with a new site, Richard Heathfield
- Re: need help with a new site, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: need help with a new site,
Chris Dollin
- Re: need help with a new site, Kenneth Brody
- Re: need help with a new site, Al Balmer
- Nested Variable Argument Macros,
William Ahern
- Re: Nested Variable Argument Macros,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Nested Variable Argument Macros, William Ahern
- Re: Nested Variable Argument Macros,
Keith Thompson
- Function Pointers,
noridotjabi@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Function Pointers, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Function Pointers, Default User
- Re: Function Pointers, Jack Klein
- Re: Function Pointers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Function Pointers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Function Pointers, pete
- Re: Function Pointers, William Ahern
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Function Pointers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Kenneth Brody
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Barry Schwarz
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Andrew Poelstra
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Ian Collins
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Richard Bos
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Kenneth Brody
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Joe Wright
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Walter Roberson
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Keith Thompson
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Andrew Poelstra
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Walter Roberson
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Function Pointers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers, Charles Richmond
- Re: Function Pointers, Tom Plunket
- Re: Function Pointers, Morris Dovey
- Re: Function Pointers, Joshua Shinavier
- Re: Function Pointers,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Take and return pointer to function,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Take and return pointer to function, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Take and return pointer to function, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Take and return pointer to function, Frederick Gotham
- Take and return pointer to function,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben C
- Re: Function Pointers, Clever Monkey
- Re: Function Pointers,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Function Pointers,
Ben C
- Re: Function Pointers, Al Balmer
- Re: Function Pointers, Tom Plunket
- Re: Function Pointers,
Ben C
- Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Mark Odell
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Morris Dovey
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Michael Mair
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Default User
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Keith Thompson
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Al Balmer
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), William Ahern
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Al Balmer
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Ben Pfaff
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Al Balmer
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), pete
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Al Balmer
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Keith Thompson
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Michael Mair
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
pete
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Keith Thompson
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), pete
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Richard Heathfield
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Al Balmer
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?),
Keith Thompson
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Marc Thrun
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Keith Thompson
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Mark F. Haigh
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Mark F. Haigh
- __STDIN__ and __STDOUT__,
noridotjabi@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: __STDIN__ and __STDOUT__, Jack Klein
- Sequence point at comma?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Michael Mair
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Robert Gamble
- Re: Sequence point at comma?,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Al Balmer
- Order of execution,
Sabiyur
- Re: Order of execution, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Order of execution, Richard Bos
- Re: Order of execution,
Michael Mair
- Re: Order of execution,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Order of execution, Michael Mair
- Re: Order of execution,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Order of execution, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Order of execution,
Chris Hills
- Re: Order of execution,
gangchen . oz
- Re: Order of execution, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills
- Re: Order of execution, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills
- Re: Order of execution, Robert Gamble
- Re: Order of execution, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills
- Re: Order of execution, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Order of execution, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Order of execution, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Order of execution, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Order of execution, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Order of execution, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Order of execution, divyank.rastogi@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Order of execution, Keith Thompson
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills
- Re: Order of execution,
gangchen . oz
- FILE *,
cerelaz
- Re: FILE *,
Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: FILE *, cerelaz
- Re: FILE *, Richard Bos
- Re: FILE *,
Igmar Palsenberg
- About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets,
sareel
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Morris Dovey
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Roberto Waltman
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Flash Gordon
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets,
deepak
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Tom St Denis
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Keith Thompson
- Re: About Transfering Complex datastructures using Sockets, Nelu
- Extending snprintf() - how to modify va_list?,
A. Farber
- Re: Extending snprintf() - how to modify va_list?, Chris Torek
- Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Tom St Denis
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, pete
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Morris Dovey
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Jack Klein
- Re: A few English terms [was Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?],
Richard Heathfield
- Re: A few English terms [was Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Thomas J. Gritzan
- OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?],
Nick Keighley
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Chris Dollin
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?],
Frederick Gotham
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Al Balmer
- Dialectal Idiosyncrasies, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Dialectal Idiosyncrasies, Al Balmer
- Re: Dialectal Idiosyncrasies, Frederick Gotham
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Walter Roberson
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Frederick Gotham
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Roberto Waltman
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Flash Gordon
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Robert Gamble
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Morris Dovey
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Chris Dollin
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Morris Dovey
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Al Balmer
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Tom Plunket
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Richard Bos
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Mark McIntyre
- kernel module: beginner,
h . silent57
- Re: kernel module: beginner,
Ian Collins
- Re: kernel module: beginner,
Ian Malone
- Re: kernel module: beginner, Joe Estock
- Re: kernel module: beginner,
Ian Malone
- Re: kernel module: beginner,
Ian Collins
- qsort() results: implementation dependent?,
Max
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?, Keith Thompson
- Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?, Duncan Muirhead
- linux redirect problem,
cmk128
- Re: linux redirect problem,
Bill Pursell
- Re: linux redirect problem,
Flash Gordon
- Re: linux redirect problem, Bill Pursell
- Re: linux redirect problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: linux redirect problem, Lew Pitcher
- Re: linux redirect problem,
Flash Gordon
- Re: linux redirect problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: linux redirect problem,
Bill Pursell
- fopen() causes an "obvious" time delay in WC ???,
liaoo
- Re: fopen() causes an "obvious" time delay in WC ???, Gordon Burditt
- Weird output when using more samples (help), Jordi
- Working with negative numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
pete
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Michael Mair
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Flash Gordon
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Working with negative numbers, pete
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Richard Tobin
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Richard Bos
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Richard Tobin
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, pete
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Eric Sosman
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Michael Mair
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Bill Pursell
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Giorgio Pastore
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
pete
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Bill Pursell
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
Giorgio Pastore
- Re: Working with negative numbers,
pete
- Negative number system as compile-time constant?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Negative number system as compile-time constant?,
pete
- Re: Negative number system as compile-time constant?, Christoph Scholtes
- Re: Negative number system as compile-time constant?,
pete
- Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please,
Smurff
- Re: Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please, Walter Roberson
- Re: Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please, Default User
- Re: Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please, Tom St Denis
- Re: Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please, Skarmander
- Re: Works on Windows but not on HPUX, Help Please, Smurff
- Is this str_rev() ok?,
ballpointpenthief
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?,
ballpointpenthief
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Malcolm
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Malcolm
- Clever Vs. Experienced, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Skarmander
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, pete
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Skarmander
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Skarmander
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, pete
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, pete
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Skarmander
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, pete
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?,
ballpointpenthief
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?, Jack Klein
- Re: Is this str_rev() ok?,
Richard Heathfield
- Segmentation Fault using the srand function,
jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function,
jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Jack Klein
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Simon Biber
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Jack Klein
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function, Default User
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function,
jtagpgmr
- Re: Segmentation Fault using the srand function,
Eric Sosman
- zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number,
junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number, Skarmander
- Re: zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number, Tom St Denis
- Re: zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number, Roberto Waltman
- Re: zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number,
Duncan Muirhead
- Re: zero the last 13 bits of an unsigned long number, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Function return type,
Christian Christmann
- Re: Function return type, Tom St Denis
- Re: Function return type, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Function return type,
inmatarian
- Re: Function return type, Keith Thompson
- Re: Function return type, pete
- Re: Function return type,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Function return type,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Function return type, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Function return type,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Function return type, Jack Klein
- Alignment of pointer to void,
David Deharbe
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void,
pete
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, pete
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, Keith Thompson
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, David Deharbe
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void,
Skarmander
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Alignment of pointer to void,
pete
- Multiplications by powers of 2,
Lisa Simpson
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2,
pete
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2,
Lisa Simpson
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, pete
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Morris Dovey
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Tim Prince
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Dik T. Winter
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Dann Corbit
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Al Balmer
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2,
Lisa Simpson
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Skarmander
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, inmatarian
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2,
Morris Dovey
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2, pnreddy1976
- Re: Multiplications by powers of 2,
pete
- Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
poodles
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Mark McIntyre
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Mark McIntyre
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?, Dik T. Winter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
poodles
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?, poodles
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?, poodles
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?, poodles
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: Mistake in solutions to K&R?,
Richard Heathfield
- hi friends,
appi
- Re: hi friends, Chris Dollin
- Re: hi friends, Vladimir Oka
- Re: hi friends,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: hi friends,
Skarmander
- Re: hi friends, pete
- Re: hi friends, Skarmander
- Re: hi friends, pete
- Re: hi friends, Skarmander
- Re: hi friends, Richard Heathfield
- Re: hi friends, Skarmander
- Re: hi friends,
santosh
- Re: hi friends, Richard Heathfield
- Re: hi friends, Joe Van Dyk
- Re: hi friends,
Skarmander
- Re: hi friends, santosh
- Re: hi friends,
Keith Thompson
- Re: hi friends, Chris Hills
- fgetc,
01
- Re: fgetc, Vladimir Oka
- Re: fgetc,
01
- Re: fgetc,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: fgetc, Richard Heathfield
- Re: fgetc, 01
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Richard Heathfield
- Re: fgetc, 01
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, 01
- Re: fgetc, Nick Keighley
- Re: fgetc, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Keith Thompson
- Re: fgetc, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: fgetc, Richard Heathfield
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Richard Heathfield
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Richard Heathfield
- Re: fgetc, pete
- Re: fgetc, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: fgetc, Morris Dovey
- Re: fgetc, Keith Thompson
- Re: fgetc, Chris Torek
- Re: fgetc,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Constructor equivalent,
Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Thad Smith
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Ian Collins
- Re: Constructor equivalent, pete
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Ian Collins
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Keith Thompson
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Ian Collins
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Tom Plunket
- Re: Constructor equivalent, Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Gernot Frisch
- Re: Constructor equivalent,
Vladimir Oka
- C sucks at math? (help),
Jordi
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Ian Collins
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Jordi
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Default User
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Jordi
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Gordon Burditt
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), pete
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Walter Roberson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), inmatarian
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Bill Pursell
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Keith Thompson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Dik T. Winter
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Richard Tobin
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Dik T. Winter
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Richard Tobin
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Flash Gordon
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Dik T. Winter
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Richard Tobin
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Keith Thompson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Richard Tobin
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Richard Tobin
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Flash Gordon
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Malcolm
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Keith Thompson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Flash Gordon
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Dik T. Winter
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Peter Boettcher
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Joe Wright
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Joe Wright
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Walter Roberson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Jordi
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Walter Roberson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Newsreader
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Gordon Burditt
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), David Wade
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Keith Thompson
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), David Wade
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Mark McIntyre
- Re: C sucks at math? (help),
Ian Collins
- Imagine: A GUI standard.,
noridotjabi@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Keith Thompson
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., John Doe
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Eric Sosman
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Walter Roberson
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., goose
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., William Ahern
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Flash Gordon
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Gordon Burditt
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Flash Gordon
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Gernot Frisch
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., pemo
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Chris Hills
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., websnarf
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Mark McIntyre
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Walter Roberson
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Dann Corbit
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Chris Hills
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard., Chris Hills
- Re: Imagine: A GUI standard.,
Frederick Gotham
- Programming challenges leading to a job?,
Romeo Colacitti
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Tom St Denis
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?,
Romeo Colacitti
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Thad Smith
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, spibou
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Thad Smith
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, spibou
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?, Robert Latest
- Re: Programming challenges leading to a job?,
Romeo Colacitti
- Programming for Memory Management,
Jay
- Re: Programming for Memory Management,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Programming for Memory Management,
Jay
- Re: Programming for Memory Management, Al Balmer
- Re: Programming for Memory Management, Rich Gibbs
- Re: Programming for Memory Management, Default User
- Re: Programming for Memory Management,
Jay
- Re: Programming for Memory Management, Keith Thompson
- Re: Programming for Memory Management,
Walter Roberson
- Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays,
kd
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays, Tom St Denis
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays,
Michael Mair
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays,
Michael Mair
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays, KeeganDunn
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays, Ben C
- Re: Arbitrary length multi-dimensional arrays, Michael Mair
- Re: constructor?,
Nelu
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: constructor?, Mark McIntyre
- Where can I learn about Multithreading for C,
bg_ie
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Nelu
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Tom St Denis
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C,
Nelu
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, bg_ie
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Tom St Denis
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Nelu
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Al Balmer
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, G4M3 C0D3R
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C, Dann Corbit
- Re: Where can I learn about Multithreading for C,
Nelu
- new CCSID's for z/OS C/C++,
Ewald Sußner
- Re: new CCSID's for z/OS C/C++,
Kenny McCormack
- Re: new CCSID's for z/OS C/C++, Skarmander
- Re: new CCSID's for z/OS C/C++,
Kenny McCormack
- automated coding standard validation?,
Konrad Palczynski
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Richard G. Riley
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Konrad Palczynski
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Robert Gamble
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Robert Gamble
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Robert Gamble
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Konrad Palczynski
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Jack Klein
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Walter Roberson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Walter Roberson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Keith Thompson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Richard G. Riley
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Keith Thompson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Michael Mair
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Michael Mair
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, tedu
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Keith Thompson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Richard Bos
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Al Balmer
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Dann Corbit
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Michael Mair
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Walter Roberson
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: automated coding standard validation?,
Richard G. Riley
- basics,
chitu
- Re: basics, Ian Collins
- Re: basics, Vladimir Oka
- Re: basics,
Keith Thompson
- Re: basics, Kenny McCormack
- Re: basics, spibou
- Re: basics,
01
- Re: basics, Flash Gordon
- Re: basics,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: basics, Keith Thompson
- Re: basics, pete
- Re: basics, Richard Heathfield
- Re: basics, Keith Thompson
- Re: basics, Al Balmer
- Re: basics, Richard Heathfield
- Practical Programming Processes: LASER Summer School, Ilinca Ciupa
- allocating space for local variables,
junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
"Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
deepak
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Tom St Denis
- Re: allocating space for local variables, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Jack Klein
- Re: allocating space for local variables, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Mark McIntyre
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Keith Thompson
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
deepak
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Jack Klein
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Al Balmer
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
Richard G. Riley
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
Al Balmer
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Richard G. Riley
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Al Balmer
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
Al Balmer
- Re: allocating space for local variables, Kenneth Brody
- Re: allocating space for local variables,
"Nils O. Selåsdal"
- finding largest numbers,
ramu
- Re: finding largest numbers,
phus . lu
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: finding largest numbers, Richard G. Riley
- Re: finding largest numbers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: finding largest numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: finding largest numbers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Morris Dovey
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: finding largest numbers, Morris Dovey
- Re: finding largest numbers, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: finding largest numbers, Thad Smith
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Keith Thompson
- Re: finding largest numbers, Frederick Gotham
- Re: finding largest numbers, Keith Thompson
- Re: finding largest numbers,
Keith Thompson
- Re: finding largest numbers, Richard Tobin
- Re: finding largest numbers, Dann Corbit
- Re: finding largest numbers,
$hiv.....
- Re: finding largest numbers, Dann Corbit
- Re: finding largest numbers,
phus . lu
- Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Ian Collins
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
Chris Torek
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Keith Thompson
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Al Balmer
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, I . M . !Knuth
- Message not available
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Keith Thompson
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Keith Thompson
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays, Keith Thompson
- Re: Warning on assigning a function-returning-a-pointer-to-arrays,
I . M . !Knuth
- Re: Thanks again! [Was: Warning on assigning...], I . M . !Knuth
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array,
chaitali . pats
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, Neil
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array,
Chris McDonald
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, Tom St Denis
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, chaitali . pats
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, Tom St Denis
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, Skarmander
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array,
Skarmander
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, chaitali . pats
- Re: MD5 message digest conversion to 16 byte array, Default User
- Re: Data structures, Skarmander
- Re: Data structures, Neil
- Re: String data input and storage,
Morris Dovey
- Re: String data input and storage,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, pete
- Re: String data input and storage, Morris Dovey
- Re: String data input and storage, Barry Schwarz
- Re: String data input and storage, Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, Barry Schwarz
- Re: String data input and storage, Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, Joe Wright
- Re: String data input and storage,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, pete
- Re: String data input and storage,
Digital Logic
- Re: String data input and storage,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, Digital Logic
- Re: String data input and storage, Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, pete
- Re: String data input and storage, Default User
- Re: String data input and storage,
Christoph Scholtes
- Re: String data input and storage, Chris Torek
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, pete
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Babak
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, pete
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Babak
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, pete
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Default User
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Keith Thompson
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Babak
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Neil
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Ian Collins
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Neil
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Richard Tobin
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Babak
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Default User
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Keith Thompson
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00,
Neil
- Re: Problem in compiling a C code with MSVC++6.00, Chris Torek
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, pete
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, lawrence . jones
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Skarmander
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, lawrence . jones
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Skarmander
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, av
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Gordon Burditt
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, L7
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, SuperKoko
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Gryff Stokoe
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Thad Smith
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in [ordinary] "for" loop?, Chris Torek
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Skarmander
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, av
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Error handling library,
pete
- Re: Error handling library, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Error handling library,
Bill Pursell
- Re: Error handling library,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Error handling library, Bill Pursell
- Re: Error handling library, pete
- Re: Error handling library, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Error handling library,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Error handling library, Michael Mair
- Re: Error handling library,
goose
- Re: Error handling library, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Tom St Denis
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Keith Thompson
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs,
jacob navia
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs,
Tom St Denis
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Juuso Hukkanen
- [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Al Balmer
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Mark McIntyre
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Nelu
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Al Balmer
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: [OT]Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Al Balmer
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, jacob navia
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs,
Tom St Denis
- Re: How to connect SQL database in C programs, Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: Learn recursion,
Kenny McCormack
- Re: Learn recursion,
Morris Dovey
- Re: Learn recursion, red_hax0r@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Learn recursion, Charles Richmond
- Re: Learn recursion,
Morris Dovey
- Re: Learn recursion, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Playing around with byte order, pete
- Re: Playing around with byte order,
inmatarian
- Re: Playing around with byte order, Frederick Gotham
- Re: C free,
spibou
- Re: C free, Flash Gordon
- Re: C free,
Malcolm
- Re: C free, Walter Roberson
- Re: C free, Gordon Burditt
- Re: C free,
Keith Thompson
- Re: C free,
pete
- Re: C free, Kenny McCormack
- Re: C free, Thad Smith
- Re: C free, Keith Thompson
- Re: C free, Harald van Dijk
- Re: C free, Eric Sosman
- Re: C free, Reddy
- Re: C free, Default User
- Re: C free, spibou
- Re: C free, Vladimir Oka
- Re: C free, Keith Thompson
- Re: C free, Vladimir Oka
- Re: C free, pete
- Re: C free, Harald van Dijk
- Re: C free, Vladimir Oka
- Re: C free, Harald van Dijk
- Re: C free, pete
- Re: C free, Flash Gordon
- Re: C free, Flash Gordon
- Re: C free, Vladimir Oka
- Re: C free, Eric Sosman
- Re: C free, pete
- Re: C free, Harald van Dijk
- Re: C free, pete
- Re: C free,
pete
- Re: C free, Charles Richmond
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
spibou
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, pete
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Al Balmer
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Al Balmer
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Al Balmer
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Al Balmer
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Gordon Burditt
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, spibou
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
spibou
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Kenny McCormack
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Peter Nilsson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Al Balmer
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, spibou
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, pete
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Is the output of the preprocessor deterministic ?, Skarmander
- Re: yacc under cygwin - undefined symbols, Mark McIntyre
- Re: yacc under cygwin - undefined symbols, Keith Thompson
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(),
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Andrew Poelstra
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(),
Tom St Denis
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(),
hzmonte
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Ian Collins
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(),
hzmonte
- Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Bill Pursell
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ben C
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Chris Torek
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Richard Tobin
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Skarmander
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
jacob navia
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Malcolm
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Skarmander
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, pete
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Frederick Gotham
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Skarmander
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
jacob navia
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
websnarf
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
Keith Thompson
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Eric Sosman
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc,
jacob navia
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?,
Bill Pursell
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?, Bill Pursell
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?,
Bill Pursell
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?,
Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?, Joe Wright
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city",
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Malcolm
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Morris Dovey
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Mark McIntyre
- Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Job: Algorithmic Search Engineers wanted, Keith Thompson
- Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Michael Mair
- Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf,
Malcolm
- Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Keith Thompson
- Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Chris Torek
- Re: Segfault City,
spibou
- Re: Segfault City,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, spibou
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Segfault City,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
Richard Heathfield
- [ot]Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: [ot]Re: Segfault City, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Segfault City,
pemo
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Skarmander
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City,
Richard Heathfield
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Segfault City,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Segfault City,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer
- Re: Segfault City,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell
- Re: Segfault City, Dave Vandervies
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Bos
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Chris Dollin
- Re: Segfault City, Chris Dollin
- Re: Segfault City,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Portable C in the real world (was: Re: Segfault City), Dave Vandervies
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Michael Mair
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Dave Vandervies
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Old Wolf
- Re: Segfault City, av
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Michael Mair
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Flash Gordon
- Re: Segfault City, Michael Mair
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Walter Roberson
- Re: Segfault City, blmblm
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Chris Smith
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Chris Smith
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Old Wolf
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
- Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Ian Collins
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Old Wolf
- Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Segfault City, Jack Klein
- Re: Segfault City,
Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Segfault City,
Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City,
Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Segfault City,
pemo
- Re: Segfault City, pete
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
spibou
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City,
spibou
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Segfault City,
Mark McIntyre
- Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer
- Re: Segfault City,
blmblm
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, blmblm
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Malcolm
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
John Smith
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, John Smith
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
blmblm
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson
- Re: Segfault City, blmblm
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer
- Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City,
spinoza1111
- Re: Segfault City, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: Segfault City, Barry
- Re: Segfault City, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
- Re: u_long valid C?, jjf
- Re: u_long valid C?, Ian Collins
- Re: u_long valid C?, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Dann Corbit
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Ian Collins
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Ian Collins
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Ian Collins
- [ot]Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, pete
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Default User
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Kenny McCormack
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Barry Schwarz
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, av
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, pete
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Michael Mair
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Keith Thompson
- Multiple names... ?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Multiple names... ?, pete
- Re: Multiple names... ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing,
Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Kenny McCormack
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, pete
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Your Uncle
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Nick Keighley
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Kenny McCormack
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Chris Dollin
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, pete
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, pete
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Frederick Gotham
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Frederick Gotham
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Keith Thompson
- Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Frederick Gotham
- Multiple names... ?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Forward Declarations,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Forward Declarations,
Tom Plunket
- Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Forward Declarations, Tom Plunket
- Re: Forward Declarations, Chris Torek
- Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Forward Declarations, Chris Torek
- Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Forward Declarations, Tom Plunket
- Re: Forward Declarations, Keith Thompson
- Re: Forward Declarations, Tom Plunket
- Re: Forward Declarations, Keith Thompson
- Re: Forward Declarations, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Forward Declarations, Keith Thompson
- Re: Forward Declarations, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Forward Declarations,
Tom Plunket
- Re: String macro as wchar_t pointer?, Eric Sosman
- Re: pointer arithmetic, Joshua Shinavier
- Re: pointer arithmetic, Walter Roberson
- Re: pointer arithmetic, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: pointer arithmetic, Neil Ferguson
- Re: pointer arithmetic, Keith Thompson
- Re: [OT] Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, Morris Dovey
- Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, MikeC
- Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface,
MikeC
- Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, Morris Dovey
- Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Robert Gamble
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Frederick Gotham
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Skarmander
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], CBFalconer
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Simon Biber
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Richard Heathfield
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
lawrence . jones
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Dik T. Winter
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Keith Thompson
- Re: Commutativity of operator [],
Dik T. Winter
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Keith Thompson
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Mark McIntyre
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?,
"Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?,
spibou
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, William Ahern
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Skarmander
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?,
spibou
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Marc Boyer
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Richard Bos
- Re: Why pointer to "one past" is allowed but pointer to "one before" is not ?, Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: beginner c question, Vladimir Oka
- Re: beginner c question,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question,
pencilneck
- Re: beginner c question, CBFalconer
- Re: beginner c question,
Asbjørn Sæbø
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question, Asbjørn Sæbø
- Re: beginner c question, Christoph Scholtes
- Re: beginner c question, mensanator@xxxxxxx
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: beginner c question, mensanator@xxxxxxx
- Re: beginner c question, pete
- Re: beginner c question, Al Balmer
- Re: beginner c question, Al Balmer
- Re: beginner c question,
goose
- Re: beginner c question, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question, Nelu
- Message not available
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Message not available
- Re: beginner c question, Nelu
- Re: beginner c question,
pencilneck
- Re: beginner c question, jacob navia
- Re: beginner c question, Dann Corbit
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question, Malcolm
- Re: beginner c question, goose
- Re: beginner c question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: beginner c question, Default User
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
Richard Bos
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
Morris Dovey
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Richard Bos
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Morris Dovey
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
Morris Dovey
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Richard Heathfield
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
rrs . matrix
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
Chris Dollin
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Richard Bos
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Tom Rauschenbach
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
CBFalconer
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, goose
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, goose
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Keith Thompson
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Keith Thompson
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Herbert Rosenau
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, CBFalconer
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, goose
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, CBFalconer
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Keith Thompson
- Re: redefine a function with a same name,
Chris Dollin
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Chris Dollin
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Joe Wright
- Re: is it possible to access members of struct in loop?, Gordon Burditt
- Re: is it possible to access members of struct in loop?, Ian Collins
- Re: bit fileds or bit manuplation, Ian Collins
- Re: bit fileds or bit manuplation, pete
- Re: Compiler Issue,
Ian Collins
- Re: Compiler Issue,
cyber citizen
- Re: Compiler Issue, Ian Collins
- Re: Compiler Issue,
cyber citizen
- Re: Compiler Issue, spibou
- Re: Compiler Issue, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Compiler Issue,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Compiler Issue,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Compiler Issue, Ian Collins
- Re: Compiler Issue, Chris Dollin
- Re: Compiler Issue, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Compiler Issue, Richard Bos
- Re: Compiler Issue, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Compiler Issue, Keith Thompson
- Re: Compiler Issue, Richard Bos
- Re: Compiler Issue, Ian Collins
- Re: Compiler Issue,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Compiler Issue, gw7rib
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf,
Tom St Denis
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf,
Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Tom St Denis
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Gordon Burditt
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf,
Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Your Uncle
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf,
Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Richard Heathfield
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Keith Thompson
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Money
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Keith Thompson
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Keith Thompson
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Frederick Gotham
- Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Jack Klein
- Re: comparing signed and unsigned integers, Eric Sosman
- Re: comparing signed and unsigned integers,
Joe Wright
- Re: comparing signed and unsigned integers, Tom St Denis
- Re: Unnamed members,
L7
- Re: Unnamed members, Tom Plunket
- Re: Unnamed members, $hiv.....
- Re: Unnamed members,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: Unnamed members,
Tom Plunket
- Re: Unnamed members, Keith Thompson
- Re: Unnamed members, Tom Plunket
- Re: Unnamed members,
Tom Plunket
- Re: Unnamed members,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Unnamed members, Tom Plunket
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", Keith Thompson
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello",
Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello",
pete
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", pete
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", pete
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", fei.liu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello", Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: char * ptr = "hello" and char carray[] = "hello",
pete
- Re: What do you think about the code?, pete
- Re: What do you think about the code?,
milhous.30@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What do you think about the code?,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins
- Re: What do you think about the code?,
Tom St Denis
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Joe Wright
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Bill Pursell
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Bos
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose
- Re: What do you think about the code?,
Andrew Poelstra
- How about *this* code? (Was: What do you think about the code?), James Dow Allen
- Re: fgets info,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: fgets info,
Keith Thompson
- Re: fgets info, Salvatore Di Fazio
- Re: fgets info,
Keith Thompson
- Re: fgets info,
pete
- Re: fgets info,
Salvatore Di Fazio
- Re: fgets info, Salvatore Di Fazio
- Re: fgets info, Kenneth Brody
- Re: fgets info,
Salvatore Di Fazio
- Re: strings in #if 0,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: strings in #if 0,
Neil
- Re: strings in #if 0, Keith Thompson
- Re: strings in #if 0, Richard Bos
- Re: strings in #if 0,
Neil
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?, pete
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?, Keith Thompson
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?, Keith Thompson
- Re: 16-Bit char pointers valid?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: ifdefs,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: ifdefs,
Walter Roberson
- Re: ifdefs, Keith Thompson
- Re: ifdefs,
Walter Roberson
- Re: ifdefs,
Walter Roberson
- Re: ifdefs,
Your Uncle
- Re: ifdefs, Walter Roberson
- Re: ifdefs, Your Uncle
- Re: ifdefs,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: ifdefs, Default User
- Re: ifdefs, Ian Collins
- Re: ifdefs, Default User
- Re: ifdefs, Ian Collins
- Re: ifdefs, Keith Thompson
- Re: ifdefs, Your Uncle
- Re: ifdefs,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: ifdefs, Roberto Waltman
- Re: ifdefs,
Your Uncle
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!,
pete
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard G . Riley
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Bos
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard G. Riley
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Tobin
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Bos
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Mark McIntyre
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Bos
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Mark McIntyre
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Default User
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, pemo
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, pemo
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Thad Smith
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Thad Smith
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, CBFalconer
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, CBFalconer
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, goose
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Malcolm
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, goose
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!,
pemo
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, pemo
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!,
Richard Heathfield
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Chris Dollin
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault,
Tim Evers
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault, Walter Roberson
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault, Tim Evers
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault,
Tim Evers
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Strange Segmentation Fault, Gordon Burditt
- Re: suppressing the console window,
Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: suppressing the console window, Walter Roberson
- Re: suppressing the console window, Simon Biber
- Re: suppressing the console window, jacob navia
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., Vladimir Oka
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence.,
CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence.,
spibou
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., spibou
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., spibou
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., Richard G. Riley
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., av
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence.,
spibou
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence.,
pete
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., CBFalconer
- Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., av
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty,
Erich Pul
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty,
global
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Erich Pul
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Neurotic
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Erich Pul
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Neurotic
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Erich Pul
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Neurotic
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Ian Collins
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty,
global
- Re: Template Engine like Smarty, Neurotic
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values,
Richard Bos
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values,
Erich Pul
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Vladimir Oka
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Erich Pul
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Richard Heathfield
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Vladimir Oka
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, CBFalconer
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Richard Heathfield
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Richard Bos
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Erich Pul
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Vladimir Oka
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Pofy
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values,
Erich Pul
- Re: random data in structure - checking for no double values, Duncan Muirhead
- Re: memory related concerns, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: memory related concerns, jaysome
- Re: memory related concerns, pete
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: regarding memset, Novice
- Re: regarding memset,
Donkey Hot
- Re: regarding memset, Eric Sosman
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, doug turnbull
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, santosh
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Ben
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Bill Pursell
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Ben
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Kenny McCormack
- Message not available
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Ben
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Malcolm
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Walter Roberson
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Tom St Denis
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array,
Nelu
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Tom St Denis
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array,
James
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Keith Thompson
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, CBFalconer
- Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: dependency checking, Michael Mair
- Re: function * = void *,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: function * = void *,
Bill Pursell
- Re: function * = void *, Bill Pursell
- Re: function * = void *, William Ahern
- Re: function * = void *, Keith Thompson
- Re: function * = void *,
Bill Pursell
- Re: function * = void *,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: function * = void *,
jaysome
- Re: function * = void *, Keith Thompson
- Re: function * = void *, Simon Biber
- Re: function * = void *, jaysome
- Re: function * = void *, Keith Thompson
- Re: function * = void *, Al Balmer
- Re: function * = void *,
jaysome
- Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Michael Mair
- Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Eric Sosman
- Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Named parameters, William Ahern
- Re: Named parameters, Eric Sosman
- Re: Named parameters,
Malcolm
- Re: Named parameters,
Clever Monkey
- Re: Named parameters, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Named parameters, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Named parameters, jaysome
- Re: Named parameters, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Named parameters, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Named parameters, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Named parameters, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Named parameters, CBFalconer
- [OT] Re: Named parameters, Clever Monkey
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, pete
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Named parameters, Bill Pursell
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson
- Re: Named parameters, Joe Wright
- Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Named parameters,
Clever Monkey
- Re: Named parameters, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Marc Boyer
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Eric Sosman
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C,
Tom St Denis
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Tobin
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Tobin
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Sjouke Burry
- Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, v4vijayakumar
- OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream],
Tom St Denis
- Re: OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream],
Walter Roberson
- Re: OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream], Tom St Denis
- Re: OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream],
Walter Roberson
- OT: Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream,
jjf
- Re: OT: Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, Richard Heathfield
- Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, CBFalconer
- Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, xhoster
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, sonofsun
- Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE,
Tom St Denis
- Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, Kenny McCormack
- Re: char confusion,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: char confusion, Vladimir Oka
- Re: char confusion, Bart Rider
- Re: char confusion,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: char confusion,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: char confusion, poodles
- Re: char confusion, Kenneth Brody
- Re: char confusion, poodles
- Re: char confusion,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: data mining,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: data mining, pemo
- Re: data mining,
Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: data mining, Your Uncle
- Re: Read-only string,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Read-only string,
v4vijayakumar
- Re: Read-only string, Richard Bos
- Re: Read-only string, Marc Thrun
- Re: Read-only string, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Read-only string [OT], "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Read-only string [OT], Kenneth Brody
- Re: Read-only string [OT], Richard Heathfield
- Re: Read-only string [OT], Chris Torek
- Re: Read-only string [OT], Kenneth Brody
- Re: Read-only string, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Read-only string,
v4vijayakumar
- Re: Read-only string, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Read-only string,
Marc Boyer
- Re: Read-only string,
v4vijayakumar
- Re: Read-only string, Marc Boyer
- Re: Read-only string, Richard Bos
- Re: Read-only string, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Read-only string, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Read-only string, Keith Thompson
- Re: Read-only string,
v4vijayakumar
- Re: Read-only string,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Read-only string,
Rk
- Re: Read-only string, Chris Dollin
- Re: Read-only string, pete
- Re: Read-only string, Chris Dollin
- Re: Read-only string,
Rk
- Re: Assembly problem, jaysome
- Re: Assembly problem, Ben C
- Re: enum question, ramu
- Re: enum question, jaysome
- Re: // vs /*,
Robert Gamble
- Re: // vs /*,
Joe Van Dyk
- Re: // vs /*, CBFalconer
- Re: // vs /*, Tim Prince
- Re: // vs /*, Nick Keighley
- Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Bos
- Re: // vs /*, Joe Van Dyk
- Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Re: // vs /*,
CBFalconer
- Re: // vs /*, Zara
- Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Re: // vs /*, Ryan Reich
- Re: // vs /*, Kenneth Brody
- Re: // vs /*, Ryan Reich
- Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell
- Re: // vs /*, Kenneth Brody
- Re: // vs /*, CBFalconer
- Re: // vs /*, Richard G. Riley
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Bos
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Bos
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Ben Pfaff
- Re: // vs /*, Harald van Dijk
- Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Mark McIntyre
- Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Mark McIntyre
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Mark McIntyre
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Kenneth Brody
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Rob Thorpe
- Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack
- Re: // vs /*,
Joe Van Dyk
- Re: // vs /*,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*,
Joe Van Dyk
- Re: // vs /*, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Message not available
- Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra
- Message not available
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, jaysome
- Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield
- Re: // vs /*, Tom St Denis
- Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: // vs /*,
Joe Van Dyk
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Dann Corbit
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?,
Michael Mair
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Jack Klein
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Old Wolf
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: I need C complier.,
Dann Corbit
- Re: I need C complier., Quas.co.ua
- Re: I need C complier.,
William Ahern
- Re: I need C complier., Quas.co.ua
- Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Dann Corbit
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Robert Gamble
- Re: FAQ-Question, Dann Corbit
- Re: FAQ-Question, dcorbit
- Re: FAQ-Question, jjf
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Robert Gamble
- Re: FAQ-Question, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Jack Klein
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Dann Corbit
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Barry Schwarz
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Barry Schwarz
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, CBFalconer
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Richard Heathfield
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Dik T. Winter
- Re: FAQ-Question, Dik T. Winter
- Re: FAQ-Question, Jack Klein
- Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham
- Re: FAQ-Question, Old Wolf
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: FAQ-Question, Nick Keighley
- Re: FAQ-Question, CBFalconer
- Re: FAQ-Question,
Jack Klein
- Re: Lex Question, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Lex Question,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Lex Question, David Shin
- Re: Lex Question, Chris Dollin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Lex Question, David Shin
- Re: Macros and Variables,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Macros and Variables, Cristian . D . Guajardo
- Re: Macros and Variables,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Macros and Variables, Cristian . D . Guajardo
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane.,
Eric Sosman
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., thomas.luce@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Frederick Gotham
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Keith Thompson
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Barry Schwarz
- Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Old Wolf
- Re: incorrect warning?, parcour@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: incorrect warning?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: incorrect warning?, Chris Torek
- Re: incorrect warning?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: incorrect warning?,
Duncan Muirhead
- Re: incorrect warning?, Keith Thompson
- Re: incorrect warning?, Duncan Muirhead
- Re: incorrect warning?, Keith Thompson
- Re: incorrect warning?, Chris Torek
- Re: incorrect warning?,
Duncan Muirhead
- Re: incorrect warning?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: mxFree, Christopher Hulbert
- Re: mxFree,
Nelu
- Re: mxFree,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: mxFree, Nelu
- Re: mxFree,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: mxFree, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: Strange malloc problem,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Strange malloc problem,
Me
- Re: Strange malloc problem, Chris Dollin
- Re: Strange malloc problem, Quas.co.ua
- Re: Strange malloc problem, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
- Re: Strange malloc problem, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Strange malloc problem,
Me
- Re: Strange malloc problem, pemo
- Re: Strange malloc problem, Me
- Re: Malloc for array of string, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Malloc for array of string, Barry Schwarz
- Re: why this code dumps core?, Ian Collins
- Re: why this code dumps core?,
Nelu
- Re: why this code dumps core?, Keith Thompson
- Re: why this code dumps core?, Charles Richmond
- Re: why this code dumps core?,
Martin Ambuhl
- Re: why this code dumps core?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Peter Nilsson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andre Reffhaug
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andre Reffhaug
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Chris Dollin
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, CBFalconer
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Chris Dollin
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Ian Malone
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Eric Sosman
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Old Wolf
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, pete
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Old Wolf
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Old Wolf
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Ben C
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Ben C
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, pete
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, CBFalconer
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Walter Roberson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Walter Roberson
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Morris Dovey
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, CBFalconer
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C,
Frederick Gotham
- XOR, Neil
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]",
Michael Mair
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]",
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Harald van Dijk
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Dik T. Winter
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Eric
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]",
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", John Bode
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
qiangchen81
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Eric
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Richard Heathfield
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
Michael Mair
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
Eric
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18, pete
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Eric
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
Joe Van Dyk
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Harald van Dijk
- Re: K&R exercise 1-18,
Eric
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Ian Collins
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Peter Nilsson
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints,
Nelu
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Nelu
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Peter Nilsson
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, pete
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Jack Klein
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints,
CBFalconer
- Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Eric Sosman
- Re: esoteric C stuff, what is "debug_flag"??, Walter Roberson
- Re: problem about function pointer, kleuske
- Re: problem about function pointer, CBFalconer
- Re: problem about function pointer, Betaver
- Re: any info on graphs algorithms examples ?,
Robert Gamble
- Re: any info on graphs algorithms examples ?,
CBFalconer
- Re: any info on graphs algorithms examples ?, Robert Gamble
- Re: any info on graphs algorithms examples ?,
CBFalconer
- Re: any info on graphs algorithms examples ?, Malcolm
- Re: convert a float to a short, Chris Dollin
- Re: convert a float to a short, Ian Collins
- Re: convert a float to a short, Keith Thompson
- Re: convert a float to a short, pete
- Re: convert a float to a short,
John Smith
- Re: convert a float to a short,
Partho
- Re: convert a float to a short, Keith Thompson
- Re: convert a float to a short,
Partho
- Re: permutation generation,
pemo
- Re: permutation generation, Peter Nilsson
- Re: permutation generation,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: permutation generation,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield
- Message not available
- Re: permutation generation, Dann Corbit
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: permutation generation,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Problem with graphics, Richard Heathfield
- Re: who had used pclint for amcc?, Jack Klein
- Re: c source, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: c source,
sathyashrayan
- Re: c source,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: c source, CBFalconer
- Re: c source,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: c source, Morris Dovey
- Re: c source,
Arild Hystad
- Re: c source, pete
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code,
Nelu
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, David Wade
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Abhi
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, jaysome
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Richard Bos
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Your Uncle
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Keith Thompson
- Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Dann Corbit
- Message not available
- Re: code hangs,
Xicheng Jia
- Re: code hangs, mdh
- Re: code hangs, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: code hangs, spibou
- Re: sizeof,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof,
Madhav
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof, Dave Vandervies
- Re: sizeof, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof, Dave Vandervies
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof, Joe Wright
- Re: sizeof, pete
- Re: sizeof,
Madhav
- Re: sizeof,
Xicheng Jia
- Re: sizeof, Malcolm
- Re: sizeof,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof, Marc Thrun
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof, $hiv.....
- Re: sizeof, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: sizeof, Xicheng Jia
- Re: sizeof, Skarmander
- Re: sizeof, ada
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof, Malcolm
- Re: sizeof, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof, Richard Bos
- Re: sizeof, Ben C
- Re: sizeof, Richard Bos
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, Ben C
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin
- Message not available
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, Richard Bos
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, tedu
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody
- Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin
- Re: sizeof, tedu
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, ozbear
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, pete
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin
- Re: sizeof, CBFalconer
- Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin
- Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin
- Re: sizeof, Richard G . Riley
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof, Ian Collins
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin
- Re: sizeof, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Memory (read) access violation handling in C, pete
- Re: Memory (read) access violation handling in C,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Memory (read) access violation handling in C, Dave Thompson
- Re: Memory (read) access violation handling in C, spibou
- Re: segmentation fault,
rrs . matrix
- Re: segmentation fault,
Piotr S.
- Re: segmentation fault, jussij
- Re: segmentation fault, CBFalconer
- Re: segmentation fault,
Piotr S.
- Re: segmentation fault,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: segmentation fault, pemo
- Re: segmentation fault, Barry Schwarz
- Re: segmentation fault, Dave Thompson
- Re: Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Pointers,
Malcolm
- Re: Pointers,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Pointers, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Pointers, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Pointers, Keith Thompson
- Re: Pointers, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Pointers,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Pointers, pete
- Re: Pointers, Xicheng Jia
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
Xicheng Jia
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, lnitsu
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Sidhu
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Kenny McCormack
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Frederick Gotham
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Kenny McCormack
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Default User
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Kenny McCormack
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Nelu
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Mark McIntyre
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Simon Lewis
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Kenny McCormack
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Dik T. Winter
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Mark McIntyre
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Richard Heathfield
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Old Wolf
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Old Wolf
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Harald van Dijk
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Keith Thompson
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4, Barry Schwarz
- Re: sizeof 'a' returns 4,
Richard Heathfield
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why occur the mistake in runtime about strtok()?,
Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: Why occur the mistake in runtime about strtok()?, Chris Dollin
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Why occur the mistake in runtime about strtok()?, John Bode
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Nelu
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double,
Robert Gamble
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double,
Martin Jørgensen
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Jack Klein
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Keith Thompson
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Barry Schwarz
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double,
Martin Jørgensen
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Keith Thompson
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Richard Heathfield
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Richard Heathfield
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, CBFalconer
- Re: cast from function call of type int to non-matching type double, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: how to deal with this problem, Ian Collins
- Re: how to deal with this problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: how to deal with this problem, Richard Bos
- Re: Pointer passing,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Pointer passing,
quigstah@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Pointer passing, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Pointer passing, Keith Thompson
- Re: Pointer passing,
quigstah@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, jacob navia
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Morris Dovey
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Tim Prince
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Dave Thompson
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
jacob navia
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
Michael Mair
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
Malcolm
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, jacob navia
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Chris Dollin
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, CBFalconer
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
xhoster
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?,
jacob navia
- Re: Sentence input and replacing, spibou
- Re: Sentence input and replacing, Markus Moll
- Re: Sentence input and replacing, sea-shadow
- Re: Sentence input and replacing, Keith Thompson
- Re: sentence, spibou
- Re: sentence, CBFalconer
- Re: sentence, Keith Thompson
- Re: sentence,
Malcolm
- Re: sentence,
av
- Re: sentence, av
- Re: sentence, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: sentence, CBFalconer
- Re: sentence, pete
- Re: sentence, av
- Re: sentence,
av
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
Bill Pursell
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
alberto
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Barry Schwarz
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
alberto
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
alberto
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Michael Mair
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, alberto
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Malcolm
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Malcolm
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Keith Thompson
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Michael Mair
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
alberto
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Joe Wright
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
Joe Estock
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, johnny
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Joe Estock
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Barry Schwarz
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Joe Estock
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, Barry Schwarz
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?, CBFalconer
- Re: knowing exact string array length ?,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: coin toss problem,
CBFalconer
- Re: coin toss problem,
Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, CBFalconer
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Ben C
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Ben C
- Re: coin toss problem, Old Wolf
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Ben Pfaff
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, pete
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Old Wolf
- Re: coin toss problem, CBFalconer
- Re: coin toss problem, Charles Richmond
- Re: coin toss problem,
Ian Collins
- Message not available
- Re: coin toss problem,
Bill Pursell
- Re: coin toss problem, pete
- Message not available
- Re: coin toss problem, CBFalconer
- Re: coin toss problem,
Bill Pursell
- Re: coin toss problem,
pete
- Re: coin toss problem, Ian Collins
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Eric Sosman
- Re: coin toss problem, Old Wolf
- Re: coin toss problem,
Ben
- Re: coin toss problem, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Re: coin toss problem, Eric Sosman
- Re: coin toss problem, Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: coin toss problem, Richard Heathfield
- Re: coin toss problem, Mark McIntyre
- Re: realloc question,
Ian Collins
- Re: realloc question, spibou
- Re: realloc question, Gordon Burditt
- Re: realloc question, CBFalconer
- Re: realloc question, Stan Milam
- Re: wit's end,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: wit's end,
Joe Smith
- Re: wit's end, Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end,
Joe Smith
- Re: wit's end,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: wit's end,
Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end, Frank Silvermann
- Re: wit's end, Richard Heathfield
- Re: wit's end, Frank Silvermann
- Re: wit's end, Michael Mair
- Re: wit's end, Your Uncle
- Re: wit's end, Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end, Kenny McCormack
- Re: wit's end, Old Wolf
- Re: wit's end, Richard Heathfield
- Re: wit's end,
Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end, Nelu
- Re: wit's end,
Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end, Keith Thompson
- Re: wit's end,
Chris Torek
- Re: wit's end, Joe Smith
- Re: wit's end, Joe Wright
- Re: wit's end, av
- Re: wit's end, ada
- Re: MPI tutorial live, Keith Thompson
- Re: a little mistake,
Malcolm
- Re: a little mistake, Julian V. Noble
- Re: a little mistake, santosh
- Re: a little mistake, Keith Thompson
- Re: a little mistake, Default User
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: a little mistake,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: a little mistake, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake, Keith Thompson
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Bos
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Bos
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, Kenneth Brody
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, Kenny McCormack
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Dave Thompson
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, Chris Dollin
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake, Keith Thompson
- Re: a little mistake, Old Wolf
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Tom St Denis
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake, CBFalconer
- Re: a little mistake, av
- Re: a little mistake, Kenny McCormack
- Re: a little mistake, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: a little mistake, Barry Schwarz
- Re: a little mistake, Frederick Gotham
- Re: a little mistake, Peter Nilsson
- Re: a little mistake, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: a little mistake,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: a little mistake,
Frederick Gotham
- Sorry wrong language, fgothamNO
- Re: a little mistake, Richard Heathfield
- Re: a little mistake, Joe Estock
- thankx,
ash
- Re: thankx, Joe Estock
- Re: thankx, CBFalconer
- Re: Undefined,
pete
- Re: Undefined, CBFalconer
- Re: Undefined,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: Undefined,
mdh
- Re: Undefined, Tom St Denis
- Re: Undefined, mdh
- Re: Undefined, Eric Sosman
- Re: Undefined, mdh
- Re: Undefined,
mdh
- Re: Printing "tab",
Tom St Denis
- Re: Printing "tab",
mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", Tom St Denis
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", Tom St Denis
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", Thomas J. Gritzan
- Re: Printing "tab", Mike S
- Re: Printing "tab", Mike S
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Printing "tab",
mdh
- Re: Printing "tab",
CBFalconer
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab", mdh
- Re: Printing "tab",
Joe Wright
- Re: Printing "tab", Jordan Abel
- Re: Printing "tab", Joe Wright
- Re: Printing "tab", Jordan Abel
- Re: Printing "tab", Julian V. Noble
- Re: Printing "tab", phil
- Re: memory,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: memory,
tomstdenis
- Re: memory, deepak
- Re: memory, Tom St Denis
- Re: memory, Chris Dollin
- Re: memory, CBFalconer
- Re: memory, Richard Heathfield
- Re: memory,
tomstdenis
- Re: memory,
Chris Dollin
- Re: memory,
deepak
- Re: memory, Chris Dollin
- Re: memory, Keith Thompson
- Re: memory,
deepak
- Re: memory,
CBFalconer
- Re: memory, Keith Thompson
- Re: what do we understand by advanced C, tomstdenis
- Re: zero lengh arrays., Michael Mair
- Re: zero lengh arrays.,
seni.yin
- Re: zero lengh arrays.,
spibou
- Re: zero lengh arrays., Richard Bos
- Re: zero lengh arrays.,
spibou
- Re: zero lengh arrays., Roberto Waltman
- Re: clc-wiki gone?,
those who know me have no need of my name
- Re: clc-wiki gone?,
Netocrat
- Re: clc-wiki gone?, Netocrat
- Re: clc-wiki gone?, Flash Gordon
- Re: clc-wiki gone?,
Netocrat
- Re: Question about style,
Mike S
- Re: Question about style,
spibou
- Re: Question about style, Mike S
- Re: Question about style,
spibou
- Re: Question about style, Arild Hystad
- Re: Question about style,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Question about style,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about style, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Question about style,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about style, Tom St Denis
- Re: Question about style,
Malcolm
- Re: Question about style, CBFalconer
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised,
Michael Mair
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised,
CBFalconer
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, Michael Mair
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, CBFalconer
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, Keith Thompson
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, CBFalconer
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised,
Keith Thompson
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, Frank Silvermann
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised,
Old Wolf
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised, Michael Mair
- Re: ANNOUNCE ggets revised,
CBFalconer
- Re: Reference, Lew Pitcher
- Re: Reference, Michael Mair
- Re: Reference,
parcour@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Reference,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Reference, parcour@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Reference,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
CBFalconer
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Charles Richmond
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Jalapeno
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Jalapeno
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Jalapeno
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
CBFalconer
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
SM Ryan
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
Jalapeno
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, CBFalconer
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?, SM Ryan
- Re: Unnamed struct members allowed?,
Jalapeno
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations,
Tim Prince
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, spibou
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Eric Sosman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, spibou
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, CBFalconer
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Nick Keighley
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Nick Keighley
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, CBFalconer
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Keith Thompson
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, jacob navia
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, jacob navia
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, CBFalconer
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Keith Thompson
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Dave Vandervies
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Ian Collins
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Eric Sosman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, websnarf
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Eric Sosman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, spibou
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Eric Sosman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, CBFalconer
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, CBFalconer
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Kevin D . Quitt
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations,
Roberto Waltman
- Re: The performance of all kinds of C operations, Chris Torek
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Ico
- Re: types of 'Open' command,
Keith Thompson
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Banfa
- Re: types of 'Open' command,
CBFalconer
- Re: types of 'Open' command,
Eric Sosman
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Kenny McCormack
- Re: types of 'Open' command,
Nelu
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Tobin
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Nelu
- Re: types of 'Open' command, CBFalconer
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Keith Thompson
- Re: types of 'Open' command, CBFalconer
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Tobin
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Nelu
- Re: types of 'Open' command, CBFalconer
- Re: types of 'Open' command <OT: HTML Standards>, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: types of 'Open' command <OT: HTML Standards>, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Mark McIntyre
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Heathfield
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Heathfield
- Re: <well OT> types of 'Open' command, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Tobin
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Nelu
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Nelu
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Keith Thompson
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Keith Thompson
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Ian Collins
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Bos
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Richard Bos
- Re: types of 'Open' command, Charles Richmond
- Re: types of 'Open' command,
Eric Sosman
- Re: How to use 64 bit integer in 16 Bit Dos ?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: How to use 64 bit integer in 16 Bit Dos ?,
Imayam
- Re: How to use 64 bit integer in 16 Bit Dos ?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: How to use 64 bit integer in 16 Bit Dos ?,
Imayam
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
Marc Boyer
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Peter Nilsson
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
CBFalconer
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
tomstdenis
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, tomstdenis
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, CBFalconer
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, tomstdenis
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, spibou
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, CBFalconer
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Keith Thompson
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Ben Pfaff
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Harald van Dijk
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, CBFalconer
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Ian Collins
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Keith Thompson
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Ian Collins
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Ian Collins
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Ian Collins
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, Keith Thompson
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code,
tomstdenis
- Re: What gcc options guarantee more portable C code, John Bode
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, pete
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic,
jackdorse
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic,
deepak
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, jackdorse
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, jackdorse
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, pete
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, Keith Thompson
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic,
deepak
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, Chris Dollin
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, Chris Torek
- Re: Address of array behavior in pointer arithmetic, Joe Wright
- Re: Managed String Library,
jacob navia
- Re: Managed String Library,
Robert Seacord
- Re: Managed String Library, jacob navia
- Re: Managed String Library, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Managed String Library, Malcolm
- Re: Managed String Library, jacob navia
- Re: Managed String Library, Malcolm
- Re: Managed String Library,
Robert Seacord
- Re: printing,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: printing,
c language
- Re: printing, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: printing,
c language
- Re: printing,
kleuske
- Re: printing, Joe Smith
- Message not available
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition,
Jordan Abel
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition, Andrew Poelstra
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition, Robert Gamble
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition,
jacob navia
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition,
Robert Gamble
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition, jacob navia
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition, Keith Thompson
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition,
Robert Gamble
- Re: memory and subroutines,
Eric Sosman
- Re: memory and subroutines,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: memory and subroutines, Eric Sosman
- Re: memory and subroutines, Frank Silvermann
- Re: memory and subroutines,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: Telecom programming, Walter Roberson
- Re: Telecom programming,
Nick Keighley
- Re: Telecom programming, a.abdulwahab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: c++ developer,
tomstdenis
- Re: c++ developer, Kenneth Brody
- Re: c++ developer, Default User
- Re: C call tree, Roberto Waltman
- Re: C call tree, Ben C
- Re: C call tree, James Dow Allen
- Re: Shift operators.,
Marc Boyer
- Re: Shift operators., Chris Dollin
- Re: Shift operators., pete
- Re: Shift operators., Tim Prince
- Re: Shift operators.,
tomstdenis
- Re: Shift operators., Marc Boyer
- Re: Shift operators.,
Chris Dollin
- Re: Shift operators.,
deepak
- Re: Shift operators., Chris Dollin
- Re: Shift operators.,
deepak
- Re: converting int to string, seni.yin
- Re: converting int to string, Michael Mair
- Re: converting int to string,
Jack Klein
- Re: converting int to string,
richard_l
- Re: converting int to string, Richard Bos
- Re: converting int to string, Keith Thompson
- Re: converting int to string,
richard_l
- Re: free(): invalid pointer, Ian Collins
- Re: free(): invalid pointer,
Robert Gamble
- Re: free(): invalid pointer,
seni.yin
- Re: free(): invalid pointer, Michael Mair
- Re: free(): invalid pointer,
seni.yin
- Re: Serial Port and Library, Neil
- Re: Serial Port and Library, Srikanth
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !,
tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, William J. Leary Jr.
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, spibou
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !,
Keith Thompson
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, SuperKoko
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Chris Dollin
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Chris Dollin
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Chris Dollin
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Chris Dollin
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Keith Thompson
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Ian Malone
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Thad Smith
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, tomstdenis
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Roberto Waltman
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !,
gw7rib
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Ian Malone
- Re: C isn't for timid souls !, Richard Bos
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Bill Pursell
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, CBFalconer
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, William Ahern
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Chris Torek
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, CBFalconer
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, santosh
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Default User
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Ian Collins
- Re: learning C with a C++ background,
Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: learning C with a C++ background, Charles Richmond
- Re: Why this is wrong?, Rafael Almeida
- Re: Why this is wrong?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Why this is wrong?,
Jack Klein
- Re: Why this is wrong?,
jaysome
- Re: Why this is wrong?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Why this is wrong?, jaysome
- Re: Why this is wrong?,
jaysome
- Re: Why this is wrong?, Chris Dollin
- Re: Why this is wrong?, rain.man
- Re: Why this is wrong?,
Charles Richmond
- Message not available
- Re: Why this is wrong?, Lew Pitcher
- Message not available
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Chris McDonald
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Chris McDonald
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Nick Keighley
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Thomas J. Gritzan
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, jaysome
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, jaysome
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Rafael Almeida
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Rafael Almeida
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Rafael Almeida
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Tobin
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
spibou
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
James Dow Allen
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, CBFalconer
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Skarmander
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, James Dow Allen
- [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, pete
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, CBFalconer
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, pete
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, CBFalconer
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Old Wolf
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Richard Bos
- Re: [ot]Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Chris McDonald
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, CBFalconer
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Joe Wright
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, CBFalconer
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Keith Thompson
- Re: Question about the *= (and similar) operator, Joe Wright
- Re: Earthquake and Tornado Forecasting Programs June 13, 2006, Frank Silvermann
- Re: comma expression, Keith Thompson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: comma expression, JAY
- Re: comma expression, JAY
- Re: String formatting, santosh
- Re: String formatting,
Brand Bogard
- Re: String formatting,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: String formatting, Keith Thompson
- Re: String formatting,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, tomstdenis
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, Chris Dollin
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!,
SuperKoko
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, aamircheema
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, tomstdenis
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, CBFalconer
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, SuperKoko
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, CBFalconer
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, tomstdenis
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, CBFalconer
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, tomstdenis
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, tomstdenis
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, Keith Thompson
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!, SuperKoko
- Re: Compiling with -O option gives different running time!,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Really basic..,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Really basic.., Vladimir Oka
- Re: Really basic..,
Marc Boyer
- Re: Really basic.., Vladimir Oka
- Re: Really basic.., Chris Dollin
- Re: Really basic..,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Really basic.., Richard Heathfield
- Re: Really basic..,
August Karlstrom
- Re: Really basic.., Ian Collins
- Re: Really basic.., Frederick Gotham
- Re: Really basic.., Richard Heathfield
- Re: Really basic.., August Karlstrom
- Re: Really basic.., Frederick Gotham
- Re: Really basic.., Richard Bos
- Re: Really basic.., Keith Thompson
- Re: Really basic..,
Barry Schwarz
- Re: Really basic.., Barry Schwarz
- Re: Really basic.., Barry Schwarz
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Ian Collins
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields,
Jack Klein
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields,
Malcolm
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Walter Roberson
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, richard_l
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, pete
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Ian Collins
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Walter Roberson
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Ian Collins
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Chris Torek
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Keith Thompson
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Ian Collins
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Bit shifting vs Bitfields,
Malcolm
- Re: GetKeyboardLayoutList, Vladimir Oka
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, CBFalconer
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Jack Klein
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Keith Thompson
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Ian Collins
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, CBFalconer
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Richard Bos
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, CBFalconer
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Keith Thompson
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: library implementation strncpy() modifies string literal, legal? more doubts need more suggestion?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: freeing memory, SM Ryan
- Re: freeing memory, jackdorse
- Re: freeing memory,
Chris Dollin
- Re: freeing memory,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: freeing memory, Keith Thompson
- Re: freeing memory, Joe Smith
- Re: freeing memory,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: How to detect the entry point of a function?, Gordon Burditt
- Re: How to detect the entry point of a function?, Jack Klein
- OT: Re: How to detect the entry point of a function?, kleuske
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting,
Smurff
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, CBFalconer
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, Dave Thompson
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, CBFalconer
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, Barry Schwarz
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Newbie help on string splitting, websnarf
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Dann Corbit
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Rafael Almeida
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?,
Peter Nilsson
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Al Balmer
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Chris Dollin
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?,
John Bode
- Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?, Martin Jørgensen
- Re: Weighted Bipartite Matching Implementation, Jack Klein
- Re: Weighted Bipartite Matching Implementation, CBFalconer
- Re: struct in C99,
Michael Mair
- Re: struct in C99,
pocmatos
- Re: struct in C99, Keith Thompson
- Re: struct in C99,
pocmatos
- Re: struct in C99,
Eric Sosman
- Re: struct in C99,
pocmatos
- Re: struct in C99, Rafael Almeida
- Re: struct in C99, Michael Mair
- Re: struct in C99, SuperKoko
- Re: struct in C99,
pocmatos
- Re: struct in C99, Keith Thompson
- Re: struct in C99, SuperKoko
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Al Balmer
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Mark Odell
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Chris Torek
- Re: Using static to init vars?, tedu
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Old Wolf
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Al Balmer
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Al Balmer
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Ronald Bruck
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Michael Mair
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Ronald Bruck
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Ronald Bruck
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
Michael Mair
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
spibou
- Re: Using static to init vars?, Michael Mair
- Re: Using static to init vars?,
spibou
- Re: Using static to init vars?, William Ahern
- Re: getchar() after EOF,
Walter Roberson
- Re: getchar() after EOF,
Michael Brennan
- Re: getchar() after EOF, CBFalconer
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Michael Brennan
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Keith Thompson
- Re: getchar() after EOF, CBFalconer
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Eric Sosman
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Keith Thompson
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Richard Tobin
- Re: getchar() after EOF,
Michael Brennan
- Re: getchar() after EOF,
Jim Cook
- Re: getchar() after EOF, Walter Roberson
- Re: easy pointer question..., Lew Pitcher
- Re: easy pointer question...,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: easy pointer question..., Kenneth Brody
- Re: easy pointer question..., Walter Roberson
- Re: easy pointer question..., lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, Vladimir Oka
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, Richard Heathfield
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, Keith Thompson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, tomstdenis
- Re: RWTPtrSlist core dumps, while removing entries., Vladimir Oka
- Re: RWTPtrSlist core dumps, while removing entries., Martin Ambuhl
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), jjf
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Mark McIntyre
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), SuperKoko
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Thomas J. Gritzan
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), SuperKoko
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Rafael Almeida
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Richard Heathfield
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), SuperKoko
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), SuperKoko
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Mark McIntyre
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Eric Sosman
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Gordon Burditt
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Eric Sosman
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Eric Sosman
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Mark McIntyre
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Old Wolf
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Old Wolf
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Harald van Dijk
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Eric Sosman
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Harald van Dijk
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Jordan Abel
- Re: [OT] gcc knows about malloc(),
Morris Dovey
- Re: [OT] gcc knows about malloc(),
Chris McDonald
- Re: [OT] gcc knows about malloc(), Morris Dovey
- Re: [OT] gcc knows about malloc(),
Chris McDonald
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Martin Ambuhl
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), jaysome
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Ian Collins
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), jaysome
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Richard Heathfield
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Ian Collins
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Jordan Abel
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Ian Collins
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Nelu
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Ian Collins
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Dave Vandervies
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Richard Bos
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Andrew Poelstra
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), jaysome
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Richard Heathfield
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), jaysome
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Richard Heathfield
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), SuperKoko
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
James Dow Allen
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Erik Trulsson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), James Dow Allen
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Walter Roberson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), James Dow Allen
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Walter Roberson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Mark McIntyre
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Mark McIntyre
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(),
Keith Thompson
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Rafael Almeida
- Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Old Wolf
- Re: globals again,
Glenn Hutchings
- Re: globals again,
Bob Martin
- Re: globals again, Glenn Hutchings
- Re: globals again,
Geometer
- Re: globals again, SuperKoko
- Re: globals again, Glenn Hutchings
- Re: globals again,
Bob Martin
- Re: Stripping html,
Morris Dovey
- Re: Stripping html,
Bill Latvin
- Re: Stripping html, Morris Dovey
- Re: Stripping html,
Bill Latvin
- Re: Stripping html,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Stripping html, Ian Collins
- Re: Stripping html, Asbjørn Sæbø
- Re: Problem with socket programming, Jack Klein
- Re: Problem with socket programming, Ben Pfaff
- Re: matrix memory allocation,
Dave Vandervies
- Re: matrix memory allocation, Ben C
- Re: matrix memory allocation, tomstdenis
- Re: matrix memory allocation, Richard Heathfield
- Re: undefined reference to ..., Jack Klein
- Re: undefined reference to ..., Ian Collins
- Re: Need some help compiling something, kleuske
- Re: Need some help compiling something,
santosh
- Re: Need some help compiling something,
Kileran
- Re: Need some help compiling something, CBFalconer
- Re: Need some help compiling something, Walter Roberson
- Re: Need some help compiling something, Kileran
- Re: Need some help compiling something, Walter Roberson
- Re: Need some help compiling something, Walter Roberson
- Re: Need some help compiling something,
Kileran
- Re: problem, Nelu
- Re: problem, Ico
- Re: problem, Walter Roberson
- Re: opinions on code,
spibou
- Re: opinions on code, spibou
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Michael Mair
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Ico
- Re: A quit strange coredump,
Ben C
- Re: A quit strange coredump,
Keith Thompson
- Re: A quit strange coredump, tomy
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Walter Roberson
- Re: A quit strange coredump, tomy
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Walter Roberson
- Re: A quit strange coredump, tomy
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Keith Thompson
- Re: A quit strange coredump, spibou
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Keith Thompson
- Re: A quit strange coredump,
Keith Thompson
- Re: A quit strange coredump, Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: problems with strtok(),
Michael Mair
- Re: problems with strtok(), Michael
- Re: shift a block of memory content,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: shift a block of memory content,
spibou
- Re: shift a block of memory content, tomstdenis
- Re: shift a block of memory content, Richard Heathfield
- Re: shift a block of memory content, tomstdenis
- Re: shift a block of memory content, Richard Heathfield
- Re: shift a block of memory content, tomstdenis
- Re: shift a block of memory content,
spibou
- Re: benchmarking c programs, russell kym horsell
- Re: problem with getchar,
kleuske
- Re: problem with getchar,
Michael Mair
- Re: problem with getchar, kleuske
- Re: problem with getchar, Michael Mair
- Re: problem with getchar,
Michael Mair
- Re: problem with getchar,
Michael Mair
- Re: problem with getchar,
shekhardeodhar
- Re: problem with getchar, CBFalconer
- Re: problem with getchar,
shekhardeodhar
- Re: problem with getchar,
keltanokka
- Re: problem with getchar,
Michael Mair
- Re: problem with getchar, Keith Thompson
- Re: problem with getchar, spibou
- Re: problem with getchar,
Michael Mair
- Re: the difference * **, Tosha
- Re: the difference * **, Malcolm
- Re: assignment from incompatible pointer type, Olaf \"El Blanco\"
- Re: exercise 1-20 K&R, Robert Gamble
- Re: exercise 1-20 K&R, Michael Mair
- Re: how to iterate through all members in a struct, Jolting
- Re: how to iterate through all members in a struct,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: how to iterate through all members in a struct, Richard Heathfield
- Re: how to iterate through all members in a struct, jaso
- Re: how to iterate through all members in a struct, Malcolm
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints,
Eric Sosman
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Frank Silvermann
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Michael Mair
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Frank Silvermann
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Frank Silvermann
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Dann Corbit
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Frank Silvermann
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, CBFalconer
- Re: rand in a closed interval on the ints, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C,
Chris McDonald
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C,
Felix H. Dahlke
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Felix H. Dahlke
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C,
Felix H. Dahlke
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C,
Young
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Keith Thompson
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, jaysome
- Re: Example for an dynamically allocated associative array in C, Ben C
- Re: MAKING DOS APPLICATION IN TURBO C++ 4.50, Dann Corbit
- <Possible follow-ups>
- MAKING DOS APPLICATION IN TURBO C++ 4.50, BHARAT MEHTA
- Re: Fixed-size FIFO queue, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Fixed-size FIFO queue, Nelu
- Re: Fixed-size FIFO queue,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Fixed-size FIFO queue, deepak
- Re: Fixed-size FIFO queue, Malcolm
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Ben Pfaff
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?, pete
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Peter Boettcher
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Lew Pitcher
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Mark Odell
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: Integer Promotion?, pete
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Coos Haak
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Integer Promotion?, Eric Sosman
- Re: Integer Promotion?,
Frederick Gotham
- Re: ddj 29, jacob navia
- Re: ddj 29,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: ddj 29, Richard Bos
- Re: Structure of functions,
Richard Bos
- Re: Structure of functions,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Structure of functions, aegis
- Re: Structure of functions, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Structure of functions, Jordan Abel
- Re: Structure of functions, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Structure of functions,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Structure of functions,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Structure of functions, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Structure of functions, Roberto Waltman
- Re: casting,
Dann Corbit
- Re: casting, Keith Thompson
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, Keith Thompson
- Re: casting,
CBFalconer
- Re: casting,
Keith Thompson
- Re: casting, CBFalconer
- Re: casting, jaysome
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, jaysome
- Re: casting, Keith Thompson
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, jaysome
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, Keith Thompson
- Re: casting, jaysome
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, pete
- Re: casting, Old Wolf
- Re: casting, Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting, Keith Thompson
- Re: casting, Richard Bos
- Re: casting,
Keith Thompson
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle, deepak
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle, Lew Pitcher
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle,
Nelu
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle,
bcaller
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle, snaidis@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle,
bcaller
- Re: Quite Smart RIddle, parcour@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?,
deepak
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?, Harald van Dijk
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?,
Skarmander
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?, Skarmander
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Is "?" a sequence point?, Kenneth Brody
- Re: need some help,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: need some help,
Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: need some help, Richard Heathfield
- Re: need some help,
CBFalconer
- Re: need some help, Richard Heathfield
- Re: need some help,
Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: need some help,
ash
- Re: need some help, Default User
- Re: need some help,
Malcolm
- Re: need some help, Michael Mair
- Re: need some help, av
- Re: need some help, CBFalconer
- Re: need some help, Default User
- Re: need some help, av
- Re: need some help, ash
- Re: need some help, shailesh . budhaner
- Re: need some help,
shailesh . budhaner
- Re: need some help, Joe Wright
- Re: inline functions,
Mark Odell
- Re: inline functions, Vladimir Oka
- Re: inline functions, Vladimir Oka
- Re: inline functions, bert
- Re: inline functions, Tim Prince
- Re: Why can't we declare an argv variable?, Ian Malone
- Re: Why can't we declare an argv variable?, Chris Dollin
- Re: Why can't we declare an argv variable?, Vladimir Oka
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Ebooks on programming, keeko
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Ian Collins
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Jean-Marc Bourguet
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Malcolm
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Keith Thompson
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Malcolm
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, av
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Jesper
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Frank Silvermann
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, jjf
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, jjf
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, P.J. Plauger
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, William J. Leary Jr.
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, jjf
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Chris Hills
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Morris Dovey
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, William J. Leary Jr.
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?,
lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Why the C committee doesn't provide an implementation when the standard is published?, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed,
Ben
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Ben
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Ben
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Ben
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Ben
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: Help with array/pointer segmentation fault needed, Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: Pointers to functions, Lew Pitcher
- Re: Pointers to functions, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Pointers to functions, Suman
- Re: Pointers to functions, Allan M. Bruce
- Re: Pointers to functions, Robert Latest
- Re: Pointers to functions, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Pointers to functions, Eric Sosman
- Re: Pointers to functions, Gordon Burditt
- Re: Pointers to functions, Chris Dollin
- Re: Pointers to functions, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: Pointers to functions,
Sjouke Burry
- Re: Pointers to functions,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Pointers to functions, Keith Thompson
- Re: Pointers to functions,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Pointers to functions, Naresh
- Re: define versus typedef, Vladimir Oka
- Re: define versus typedef,
Mark Odell
- Re: define versus typedef, Christian Christmann
- Re: define versus typedef, Chris Dollin
- Re: define versus typedef, Neroku
- Re: define versus typedef,
Kenneth Brody
- Re: define versus typedef,
Eric Sosman
- Re: define versus typedef, Kenneth Brody
- Re: define versus typedef, Keith Thompson
- Re: define versus typedef,
Eric Sosman
- Re: define versus typedef, Krishanu Debnath
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Default User
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Walter Roberson
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?,
Gordon Burditt
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Lew Pitcher
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Richard Tobin
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Gordon Burditt
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Richard Heathfield
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?,
CBFalconer
- Re: How Do I License & Protect My Software?, Mark McIntyre
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: where to find functions libariey, VDM
- Re: where to find functions libariey, Jordan Abel
- Re: about the #pragma, Kenneth Brody
- Re: about the #pragma,
Keith Thompson
- Re: about the #pragma, Roberto Waltman
- Re: about the #pragma,
santosh
- Re: about the #pragma, Default User
- Re: about the #pragma, Default User
- Re: about the #pragma,
rwen2012@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: about the #pragma, Nelu
- <Possible follow-ups>
- about the #pragma, rwen2012@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library,
tedu
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library,
jacob navia
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library, jacob navia
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library, William Ahern
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library, Dave Thompson
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library, websnarf
- Re: opensolaris C library vs. GNU C Library,
jacob navia
- Re: assigiment problem,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: assigiment problem, natman
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Naresh
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Vladimir Oka
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Chris Dollin
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(),
Suman
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(),
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Tim Prince
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Suman
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Malcolm
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), pete
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Richard Heathfield
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(),
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Source Code for memcpy(), Malcolm
- Re: conditional operator again,
Markus Moll
- Re: conditional operator again, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: conditional operator again, Chris Dollin
- Re: Any references on pattern matching?, Flash Gordon
- Re: stdint.h vs. stdio.h, Harald van Dijk
- Re: stdint.h vs. stdio.h, SM Ryan
- Re: stdint.h vs. stdio.h, SM Ryan
- Re: stdint.h vs. stdio.h, copx
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Malcolm
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Nick Keighley
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, CBFalconer
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!,
genestarwing
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, jjf
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Default User
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Default User
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Dann Corbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Dann Corbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Old Wolf
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Frank Silvermann
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Richard Heathfield
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Kenny McCormack
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Dann Corbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Dann Corbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Dann Corbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, dcorbit
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Keith Thompson
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!,
genestarwing
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Message not available
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, genestarwing
- Re: NEED HELP WITH A PROGRAM....ANYONE PLEASE HELP!, Robert Allison
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Allan Adler
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Malcolm
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?,
Keith Thompson
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?,
Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, jacob navia
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Allan Adler
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, spibou
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Morris Dovey
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Ben Pfaff
- Message not available
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?, Keith Thompson
- Re: How do I make my own custom C compiler?,
Giannis Papadopoulos
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: x=(x=5,11),
Harald van Dijk
- Message not available
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Harald van Dijk
- Message not available
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Harald van Dijk
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: x=(x=5,11), google
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall
- Message not available
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Barry Schwarz
- Re: x=(x=5,11), google
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Barry Schwarz
- Re: x=(x=5,11), google
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Barry Schwarz
- Message not available
- Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall
- Re: #define p,
Keith Thompson
- Re: #define p,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: #define p, Keith Thompson
- Re: #define p, Frank Silvermann
- Re: #define p, Keith Thompson
- Re: #define p, Joe Smith
- Re: #define p, Keith Thompson
- Re: #define p, Frank Silvermann
- Re: #define p, Dave Thompson
- Re: #define p,
jjf
- Re: #define p, Keith Thompson
- Re: #define p,
Frank Silvermann
- Re: Not reading in what was written out..., Peter Nilsson
- Re: Not reading in what was written out..., Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: How to decide whether it is an English letter or a number?, Dale
- Re: How to decide whether it is an English letter or a number?, Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: How to decide whether it is an English letter or a number?, Default User
- Re: How to decide whether it is an English letter or a number?, Simon Biber
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number,
Dann Corbit
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number,
spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, pete
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, pete
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, pete
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, Default User
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, CBFalconer
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number,
spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, spibou
- Re: how do I tell whether the read is an English letter or a number, Ian Collins
- Re: Searching the MSDN Win API, Flash Gordon
- Re: Strange Question,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: Strange Question,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Strange Question, bcaller
- Re: Strange Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, kyle york
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Message not available
- Re: Strange Question, Chris Torek
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Strange Question, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
- Re: Strange Question, CBFalconer
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, CBFalconer
- Re: Strange Question, Jordan Abel
- Re: Strange Question, Kenneth Brody
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, Mark McIntyre
- Re: Strange Question, Keith Thompson
- Re: Strange Question, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Strange Question, Richard Bos
- Re: Strange Question,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Strange Question,
Flash Gordon
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, Giannis Papadopoulos
- Re: Strange Question, spibou
- Re: Strange Question, Flash Gordon
- Re: Strange Question, Eric Sosman
- Re: Strange Question, REH
- Re: Strange Question, CBFalconer
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Marc Boyer
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Flash Gordon
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Graham J Lee
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, mdler
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Ben Pfaff
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Chris Torek
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Ben Pfaff
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Chris Dollin
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Chris Dollin
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Vladimir Oka
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Duncan Muirhead
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Neroku
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Flash Gordon
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Chris Dollin
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Keith Thompson
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Chris Dollin
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;,
Keith Thompson
- Re: (boolean_expression) ? statement;, Keith Thompson
- Re: nested conditional operator, Chris Dollin
- Re: nested conditional operator,
pete
- Re: nested conditional operator,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: nested conditional operator, Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: nested conditional operator, Kenneth Brody
- Re: nested conditional operator, pete
- Re: nested conditional operator,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: nested conditional operator, Old Wolf
- Re: nested conditional operator, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: nested conditional operator,
Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: nested conditional operator, CBFalconer
- Re: nested conditional operator, Thad Smith
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process, Ian Collins
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process,
CBFalconer
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process, Keith Thompson
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process,
jacob navia
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process,
Flash Gordon
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process, jacob navia
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process, Richard Bos
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process,
Flash Gordon
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process,
Malcolm
- Re: How to get total heap size of a process, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number, CBFalconer
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number,
Sriram Rajagopalan
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number, Chris Dollin
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number, Flash Gordon
- Re: Use of bitwise operator for signed number, pete
- Re: portability problem,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: portability problem, Flash Gordon
- Re: portability problem, Richard Bos
- Re: portability problem, copx
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Chris Dollin
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Michael Mair
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Walter Roberson
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Chris Dollin
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, lovecreatesbeauty
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, pete
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?,
Al Balmer
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Ben Pfaff
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?, Roberto Waltman
- Re: Three #include guards, which will never break?,
Walter Roberson
- Re: Yet another pointer issue!!, CBFalconer
- Re: Yet another pointer issue!!, tedu
- Re: Yet another pointer issue!!, jjf
- Re: Yet another pointer issue!!, John Bode
- Re: Validating user input?,
chuck
- Re: Validating user input?, spibou
- Re: Validating user input?,
Dann Corbit
- Re: Validating user input?, chuck
- Re: Validating user input?,
octangle
- Re: Validating user input?,
chuck
- Re: Validating user input?, Dann Corbit
- Re: Validating user input?, octangle
- Re: Validating user input?, octangle
- Re: Validating user input?,
chuck
- Re: Is this valid C?,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Is this valid C?,
andrew queisser
- Re: Is this valid C?, Fred Kleinschmidt
- Re: Is this valid C?, andrew queisser
- Re: Is this valid C?,
andrew queisser
- Re: strstr and const problem,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: strstr and const problem, smnoff
- Re: strstr and const problem, Robert Harris
- Re: strstr and const problem, av
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
pete
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf", Dik T. Winter
- Re: "long double" and "printf", Dann Corbit
- Re: "long double" and "printf", jacob navia
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Richard Bos
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf", Richard Bos
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf", Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Zero
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Flash Gordon
- Re: "long double" and "printf", Tim Prince
- Re: "long double" and "printf",
Flash Gordon
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, bert
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal,
Eric Sosman
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Eric Sosman
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, jaks . maths
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Richard Heathfield
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, spibou
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Chris Dollin
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Eric Sosman
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal,
Vladimir Oka
- Re: Converting negative integer to octal/hexadecimal, Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Semi-defined Function arguments???, Vladimir Oka
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., Marc Boyer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Problem about type promotion and equality operator.,
KOFKS
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator.,
Flash Gordon
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., KOFKS
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., CBFalconer
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., Keith Thompson
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., CBFalconer
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator., Keith Thompson
- Re: Problem about type promotion and equality operator.,
Flash Gordon
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C,
Richard Heathfield
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C,
Summu82
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C, Summu82
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C, Richard Heathfield
- Re: covert time from date Hour min sec format to epoch time i.e time since 1 jan 1970 in C,
Summu82
- Re: preprocessor problem,
Harald van Dijk
- Re: preprocessor problem,
onkar
- Re: preprocessor problem, Suman
- Re: preprocessor problem,
onkar
- Re: Struct assignment, historical question,
Jack Klein
- Re: Struct assignment, historical question, William J. Leary Jr.
- Re: Struct assignment, historical question,
Suman
- Re: Struct assignment, historical question, lawrence . jones
- Re: Struct assignment, historical question, SuperKoko
- Re: name of running code,
Ian Collins
- Re: name of running code,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, spibou
- Re: name of running code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, spibou
- Re: name of running code, Nelu
- Re: name of running code, Default User
- Re: name of running code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, CBFalconer
- Re: name of running code, Nelu
- Re: name of running code, Walter Roberson
- Re: name of running code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, Eric Sosman
- Re: name of running code, Dik T. Winter
- Re: name of running code,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: name of running code, Albretch Mueller
- Re: help with a funcition-please,
Andrew Poelstra
- Re: help with a funcition-please,
natman
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Simon Biber
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Simon Biber
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Walter Roberson
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Simon Biber
- Re: help with a funcition-please,
natman
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Andrew Poelstra
- Re: help with a funcition-please,
natman
- Re: help with a funcition-please, Keith Thompson
- Re: Global Variables,
Ian Collins
- Re: Global Variables, Keith Thompson