Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: W Marsh <wayne.marsh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:49:19 +0100
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:45:02 -0700, "Dann Corbit" <dcorbit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Languages do not age the way that people think they do.
COBOL and BASIC are alive and well.
C will never go away.
For writing simple filter programs, it is a very good alterative.
Languages like C# and Java have to go garbage collection and hence are
unsuitable for real-time stuff.
Can you imagine .NET installed on a toaster IC to pop your toast up in the
morning? I can't.
Java is used extensively on embedded devices. You're making yourself
look a bit silly, there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: Dann Corbit
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- References:
- C is too old? opinions?
- From: Lasse Espeholt
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: Dann Corbit
- C is too old? opinions?
- Prev by Date: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Next by Date: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Previous by thread: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Next by thread: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|