Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: "Dann Corbit" <dcorbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:53:06 -0700
"W Marsh" <wayne.marsh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oc5db2d2fqj4jkht7ihl2pr45javrb8ee5@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:45:02 -0700, "Dann Corbit" <dcorbit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Languages do not age the way that people think they do.
COBOL and BASIC are alive and well.
C will never go away.
For writing simple filter programs, it is a very good alterative.
Languages like C# and Java have to go garbage collection and hence are
unsuitable for real-time stuff.
Can you imagine .NET installed on a toaster IC to pop your toast up in the
morning? I can't.
Java is used extensively on embedded devices. You're making yourself
look a bit silly, there.
How does your response relate to my post?
Is Java used for real-time systems (if so, they should fire the product
implementors for incompetence).
Does Java require .NET?
I think you have a reading comprehension problem.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: Old Wolf
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: John Bode
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: W Marsh
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- References:
- C is too old? opinions?
- From: Lasse Espeholt
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: Dann Corbit
- Re: C is too old? opinions?
- From: W Marsh
- C is too old? opinions?
- Prev by Date: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Next by Date: Re: What functions in UNIX 6th implement search and sort algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Next by thread: Re: C is too old? opinions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|