Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Jonathan Pritchard <jonpritchard@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 14:25:43 +0100
Keith Thompson wrote:
jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
The Original Poster of the thread started asking about an IDE.
Besides, I do think that IDEs *are* topical here and that this
group is hijacked by people that want it to discuss a narrow
part of the language (C89) and not all the environment where
the language lives.
For the record, we routinely discuss C89/C90 *and* C99, and
occasionally pre-standard versions of the language, and such
discussions are (almost?) universally accepted as topical. The fact
that some of us will point out that depending on C99-specific features
can cause portability problems does not change the fact that C99 is
considered topical here.
(My comment in this followup applies only to that one narrow point,
and not to any debate about who may or may not have hijacked what.)
Keith, which standard do you try and adhere to? Or more generally which should you try and adhere too, if you would like to be able to easily port code to Linux/Windows/Mac?
--
Reclaim Your Inbox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- References:
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Jonathan Pritchard
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: jacob navia
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: jacob navia
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: C IDE Recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: C IDE Recommendations
- Next by Date: Re: I want to clear a portion of screen - How??
- Previous by thread: Re: C IDE Recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: C IDE Recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|