Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:43:16 +0000
Andrew Poelstra said:
Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx> writes:
Are you assuming that memory that has been free()d *will* be reclaimed
by the operating system? If so, what is your basis for that
assumption?
Since there's some confusion on this point:
To me it appears that this is just a question. It doesn't appear to be
making any assumptions about what the answer might be. It certainly
doesn't appear offensive in any way.
No, it doesn't appear offensive to me, either. But you'd be surprised at how
easily people can take offence. Any of us. For example, you'd probably be
offended if I called you a... well, let's not go there. :-)
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- References:
- Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: SkyBlue
- Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Frederick Gotham
- Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Joe Wright
- Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- Prev by Date: Re: standard libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Free on program exit (was: Simple code leads to segfault.. help)
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- Next by thread: Re: Simple code leads to segfault.. help
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|