Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:20:49 +0200
jmcgill wrote:
jacob navia wrote:
jmcgill wrote:
jacob navia wrote:
I find linux and windows are quite a big part of
the workstation market.
Linux and Windows having what, exactly, to do with the C99 standard?
because you said:
It is portable among systems implementing the standard, if you can find
any.
I found two
Neither "windows" nor "linux" is a C99 compiler or runtime library, so I
really have no idea what you are trying to claim.
Excuse me, I misunderstood "system" as operating system.
Actually, it looks that you meant "compiler system". Well,
my answer stays, gcc implements C99 under unix, and under windows
there is intel compiler, lcc-win32 and Comeau, that actually
also runs under Unix.
That makes for more than two "compiler systems"
jacob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jmcgill
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- References:
- C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: sunny
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jmcgill
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jacob navia
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jmcgill
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jacob navia
- Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- From: jmcgill
- C99 Versus ANSI.
- Prev by Date: Re: HCL interview questions can any one say solution for it
- Next by Date: Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- Previous by thread: Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- Next by thread: Re: C99 Versus ANSI.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|