Re: A simple parser
- From: Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:52:23 +0100
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:09:45 GMT, in comp.lang.c , Keith Thompson
<kst-u@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:36:08 +0000, in comp.lang.c , Richard[..]
Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard said:
Err, for the C99 features I use (primarily localised declarations),
gcc. I thought I mentioned that?
In order to get gcc to support those features, one must invoke it in a
non-conforming mode.
This is false and you know it.
No, he's right on this point.
No he's not.
gcc has a mode in which it's reasonably (but not perfectly) conforming
to C90. It has no mode in which it's as conforming to C99.
I disagree, but unlike RJH I have no intention of wasting my time
prolonging this thread further.
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
.
- References:
- A simple parser
- From: jacob navia
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: A simple parser
- From: Keith Thompson
- A simple parser
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparing Pointer
- Next by Date: Re: A simple parser
- Previous by thread: Re: A simple parser
- Next by thread: Re: A simple parser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|