Re: if clause
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:53:19 +0000
Chris Dollin said:
Richard Heathfield wrote:<snip>
The thing that put me off multiple returns was [...]
I wouldn't want to put anyone through that. So I don't.
Arguing that X is bad because you've seen bad examples of X isn't
very convincing, unless you can show that there are no /good/
examples of X.
I'm not trying to argue that X is bad. I'm just pointing out that in *my*
experience I find X hard to maintain in general terms, and consequently I
don't like to inflict X on other people (including myself). Clarity takes
precedence over religion.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: if clause
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: if clause
- References:
- if clause
- From: rogz
- Re: if clause
- From: Ancient_Hacker
- Re: if clause
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: if clause
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: if clause
- From: Chris Dollin
- if clause
- Prev by Date: Re: assembly in future C standard
- Next by Date: Re: C Interview Questions
- Previous by thread: Re: if clause
- Next by thread: Re: if clause
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|