comp.lang.c

• Date Index

---

• string search?, Bertram Trabant
  • Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield
• need for an extra variable., chandanlinster
  • Re: need for an extra variable., Zero
  • Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Heathfield
  • Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Tobin
    • Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Heathfield
• realloc(): invalid next size, solanki.chandrakant@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: realloc(): invalid next size, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: realloc(): invalid next size, Herbert Rosenau
• how to design an testing example, qazwsx746
  • Re: how to design an testing example, Subbu
    • Re: how to design an testing example, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: how to design an testing example, Keith Thompson
• not writing to file, John Smith
  • Re: not writing to file, Adrian
  • Re: not writing to file, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: not writing to file, Herbert Rosenau
• Triangular Matrix, Je-Givara
  • Re: Triangular Matrix, Simon Biber
  • Re: Triangular Matrix, Eric Sosman
• debugging, Sheldon
  • Re: debugging, Bill Pursell
    • Re: debugging, Sheldon
      • Re: debugging, Bill Pursell
      • Re: debugging, Sheldon
• C Interview Questions, dhruvaraj
  • Re: C Interview Questions, David Wade
  • Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C Interview Questions, Adrian
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Simon Biber
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C Interview Questions, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Old Wolf
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C Interview Questions, William Hughes
• type identifier and OO design, Laurent Deniau
• if clause, rogz
  • Re: if clause, Nick Keighley
    • Re: if clause, rogz
    • Re: if clause, Bart
  • Re: if clause, mark_bluemel
  • Re: if clause, Barry
  • Re: if clause, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: if clause, Michal Nazarewicz
      • Re: if clause, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: if clause, Bill Medland
    • Re: if clause, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: if clause, Clever Monkey
    • Re: if clause, Al Balmer
    • Re: if clause, Eric Sosman
      • Re: if clause, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: if clause, Chris Dollin
      • Re: if clause, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: if clause, Chris Dollin
      • Re: if clause, Richard Heathfield
• Run a program behind screen, hurry
  • Re: Run a program behind screen, Richard Heathfield
• I have a problem in my study, qazwsx746
  • Re: I have a problem in my study, Cong Wang
    • Re: I have a problem in my study, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: I have a problem in my study, Cong Wang
  • Re: I have a problem in my study, mark_bluemel
  • Re: I have a problem in my study, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: I have a problem in my study, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: I have a problem in my study, Chris Dollin
    • Re: I have a problem in my study, Herbert Rosenau
  • Re: I have a problem in my study, yuyang . sz
  • Re: I have a problem in my study, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: I have a problem in my study, Herbert Rosenau
      • Re: I have a problem in my study, Richard Heathfield
• structure pointers, raghu
  • Re: structure pointers, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: structure pointers, raghu
      • Re: structure pointers, Steven Kirby
      • Re: structure pointers, raghu
      • Re: structure pointers, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: structure pointers, Steven Kirby
  • Re: structure pointers, Fred Kleinschmidt
• finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, prasadjoshi124
  • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, SM Ryan
    • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Herbert Rosenau
      • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Jordan Abel
      • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, SM Ryan
      • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Herbert Rosenau
  • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
    • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, prasadjoshi124
  • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Herbert Rosenau
  • Re: finding how much the file system is full, from a C program?, Iwo Mergler
• memory leakage problem, chets
  • Re: memory leakage problem, Walter Roberson
  • Re: memory leakage problem, Simon Biber
• free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Kavya
  • Re: free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Kavya
  • Re: free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: free void*-- why not undefined behavior?, Default User
• how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Thomas Zhu
  • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), websnarf
  • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), hurry
    • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Yin Zhu
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Yin Zhu
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Eric Sosman
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Richard Bos
      • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Ico
  • Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), Richard Harter
• Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Kavya
      • Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Harald van Dijk
• Sort it with one array and some tmp files, jason735
  • Re: Sort it with one array and some tmp files, CBFalconer
    • Re: Sort it with one array and some tmp files, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Sort it with one array and some tmp files, jason735
  • Re: Sort it with one array and some tmp files, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Sort it with one array and some tmp files, Julian V. Noble
• Structures or Array Notation for many possible strings of finite length?, nospam
  • Re: Structures or Array Notation for many possible strings of finite length?, Malcolm
  • Re: Structures or Array Notation for many possible strings of finite length?, Barry Schwarz
• Include path question, Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Include path question, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Include path question, Malcolm
    • Re: Include path question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Include path question, Malcolm
      • Re: Include path question, Barry
      • Systems w/o directories (Was: Include path question), Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Include path question, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Include path question, Malcolm
      • Re: Include path question, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Include path question, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Include path question, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Include path question, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Include path question, Jalapeno
      • Re: Include path question, Jalapeno
      • Re: Include path question, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Include path question, Leor Zolman
      • Re: Include path question, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Include path question, CBFalconer
      • Re: Include path question, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Include path question, Leor Zolman
      • Re: Include path question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Include path question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Include path question, CBFalconer
  • Re: Include path question, Jean-Marc Bourguet
    • Re: Include path question, Jan Engelhardt
• Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Martin Ambuhl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Bill Reid
    • [ot]Re: The Quantum Pyramid, pete
      • Re: [ot]Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Bill Reid
      • Re: [ot]Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Clever Monkey
  • Re: The Quantum Pyramid, Ancient_Hacker
• assembly in future C standard, fermineutron
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, Michal Nazarewicz
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: assembly in future C standard, jacob navia
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, fermineutron
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, fermineutron
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, CBFalconer
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, fermineutron
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Flash Gordon
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Default User
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Bill Reid
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Bos
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Eric Sosman
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Ian Collins
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, John Bode
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Jordan Abel
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Harter
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, John Bode
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Chris Dollin
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Bos
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Bart
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Eric Sosman
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Chris Torek
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, jacob navia
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Bos
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, Thomas Lumley
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: assembly in future C standard, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson
  • Re: assembly in future C standard, jacob navia
    • Re: assembly in future C standard, Chris Torek
• Memory allocation based on a big array, Frank W. Steiner
  • Re: Memory allocation based on a big array, CBFalconer
    • Re: Memory allocation based on a big array, jaysome
      • Re: Memory allocation based on a big array, CBFalconer
  • Re: Memory allocation based on a big array, Andrew Poelstra
• compiling problems, Sheldon
  • Re: compiling problems, Eric Sosman
  • Re: compiling problems, Bill Pursell
    • Re: compiling problems, Sheldon
  • Re: compiling problems, CBFalconer
    • Re: compiling problems, Sheldon
    • Re: compiling problems, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: compiling problems, Sheldon
      • Re: compiling problems, Keith Thompson
      • Re: compiling problems, Richard Heathfield
• printing all escape sequence characters, chandanlinster
  • Re: printing all escape sequence characters, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: printing all escape sequence characters, backasswards
  • Re: printing all escape sequence characters, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: printing all escape sequence characters, Giorgio Silvestri
• pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Kavya
  • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Cong Wang
  • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Old Wolf
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, pete
  • Re: pointer to an array -Is there an out of bound access?, james of tucson
• about TorboC, CCMC
  • Re: about TorboC, Kavya
    • Re: about TorboC, CBFalconer
      • [OT] Re: about TorboC, Joe Estock
  • Re: about TorboC, Malcolm
    • Re: about TorboC, Richard Bos
• C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
  • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
    • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, jacob navia
    • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, jacob navia
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Coos Haak
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, T.M. Sommers
  • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bill Medland
    • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Walter Roberson
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, CBFalconer
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bart
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Iwo Mergler
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bill Medland
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, fermineutron
  • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Simon Biber
      • Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Heathfield
• Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., MQ.john@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Chris Johnson
    • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Walter Roberson
    • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Keith Thompson
    • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., MQ.john@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Eric Sosman
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., MQ.john@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Chris Dollin
      • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Eric Sosman
  • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Chris Dollin
    • Re: Weird Pointer In C, Please Help. Code supply..., Keith Thompson
• Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, arindam . mukerjee
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, mark_bluemel
    • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Ian Malone
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Bill Medland
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, arindam . mukerjee
      • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Eric Sosman
      • CT: Where did "implicit cast" originate? Was Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: CT: Where did "implicit cast" originate? Was Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Joe Wright
      • Re: CT: Where did "implicit cast" originate? Was Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: CT: Where did "implicit cast" originate? Was Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, pete
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, CBFalconer
    • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, james of tucson
  • Re: Why do integer-to-double conversions do not happen in printf, Keith Thompson
• operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Kavya
  • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Bart
  • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Richard Tobin
    • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Ahmed Kalembo
      • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Keith Thompson
      • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Ahmed Kalembo
      • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: operators requiring lvalue/rvalue operands and resulting in rvalue/lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich
• Accessing structure members indirectly, Kavya
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Ark
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Bart
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Richard Bos
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Walter Roberson
    • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Kavya
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Kavya
      • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Kavya
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: Accessing structure members indirectly, Keith Thompson
• re-definition of standard types, Roman Mashak
  • Re: re-definition of standard types, Bart
    • Re: re-definition of standard types, BRG
      • Re: re-definition of standard types, Malcolm
      • Re: re-definition of standard types, BRG
      • Re: re-definition of standard types, Malcolm
      • Re: re-definition of standard types, BRG
  • Re: re-definition of standard types, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: re-definition of standard types, websnarf
• typedef aliasing, James Brown
  • Re: typedef aliasing, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: typedef aliasing, James Brown
  • Re: typedef aliasing, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: typedef aliasing, James Brown
• time() sleep() and dst, reppisch
  • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Richard Bos
    • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Jordan Abel
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, CBFalconer
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Jordan Abel
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Flash Gordon
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Jordan Abel
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, CBFalconer
      • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Eric Sosman
  • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Jordan Abel
    • Re: time() sleep() and dst, CBFalconer
  • Re: time() sleep() and dst, Ancient_Hacker
• Print bitmap file, Myombi Natuse
  • Re: Print bitmap file, Richard Bos
  • Re: Print bitmap file, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Print bitmap file, Bart
    • Re: Print bitmap file, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Print bitmap file, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Print bitmap file, CBFalconer
    • Re: Print bitmap file, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Print bitmap file, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Print bitmap file, Mark McIntyre
• Debugging C vs debugging C++, jacob navia
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Spiros Bousbouras
    • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Spiros Bousbouras
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, jacob navia
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, jacob navia
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, websnarf
  • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Ian Collins
    • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, CBFalconer
      • Re: Debugging C vs debugging C++, Ian Collins
• in something not a structure or union, Kodorna
  • Re: in something not a structure or union, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: in something not a structure or union, Kodorna
      • Re: in something not a structure or union, Kodorna
      • Re: in something not a structure or union, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: in something not a structure or union, CBFalconer
      • Re: in something not a structure or union, Joe Estock
  • Re: in something not a structure or union, Fred Kleinschmidt
• problems calling a function contained in a dll, Alan
  • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Bill Medland
    • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Alan
  • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Keith Thompson
  • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, jacob navia
    • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Alan
  • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, jacob navia
    • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, CBFalconer
    • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Alan
      • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, CBFalconer
      • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: problems calling a function contained in a dll, Kenny McCormack
• C / asm / long ints, fermineutron
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, mensanator@xxxxxxx
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, Jack \"Abram\" Off
    • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Bos
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, stevenj
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Bos
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, Nishu
    • Re: C / asm / long ints, Chris Thomasson
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, CBFalconer
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Chris Thomasson
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Bos
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C / asm / long ints, Mark F. Haigh
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: C / asm / long ints, Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: C / asm / long ints, Ancient_Hacker
• va_arg(), LIT
  • Re: va_arg(), Richard Tobin
  • Re: va_arg(), mark_bluemel
    • Re: va_arg(), LIT
      • Re: va_arg(), David Resnick
      • Re: va_arg(), mark_bluemel
      • Re: va_arg(), Laurent Deniau
      • Re: va_arg(), David Tiktin
      • Re: va_arg(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: va_arg(), Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: va_arg(), David Resnick
      • Re: va_arg(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: va_arg(), David Resnick
      • Re: va_arg(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: va_arg(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: va_arg(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: va_arg(), Christopher Benson-Manica
• define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Ben
  • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Papastefanos Serafeim
    • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Ben
    • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Chris Torek
  • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Ben
  • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, SM Ryan
      • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: define a struct that has its own type as a field somehow?, SM Ryan
• K&R2 variable definition, Clausfor
  • Re: K&R2 variable definition, Zara
    • Re: K&R2 variable definition, Clausfor
  • Re: K&R2 variable definition, Richard Tobin
  • Re: K&R2 variable definition, Chris Dollin
  • Re: K&R2 variable definition, Richard Heathfield
• string manipulation, avida
  • Re: string manipulation, mark_bluemel
    • Re: string manipulation, avida
      • Re: string manipulation, mark_bluemel
      • Re: string manipulation, Malcolm
  • Re: string manipulation, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: string manipulation, Mark McIntyre
• about Database in C, raghu
  • Re: about Database in C, Ico
    • Re: about Database in C, thunder1
  • Re: about Database in C, mark_bluemel
  • Re: about Database in C, dcorbit
• gdb: breakpoint condition to compare string, Pawel
  • Re: gdb: breakpoint condition to compare string, Ian Collins
• How to test for the existence of __func__?, dave_140390
  • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Ian Collins
    • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Richard Bos
    • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, dave_140390
  • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Greg Comeau
  • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Old Wolf
    • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: How to test for the existence of __func__?, Ancient_Hacker
• New to Programming, SG
  • Re: New to Programming, Glenn Hutchings
  • Re: New to Programming, J. J. Farrell
    • Re: New to Programming, Richard
      • Re: New to Programming, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: New to Programming, Jordan Abel
      • Re: New to Programming, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: New to Programming, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: New to Programming, Ian Collins
      • Re: New to Programming, Lowell Gilbert
      • Re: New to Programming, arnuld
  • Re: New to Programming, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: New to Programming, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: New to Programming, CBFalconer
    • Re: New to Programming, Charlton Wilbur
  • Re: New to Programming, Spiros Bousbouras
  • Re: New to Programming, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: New to Programming, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: New to Programming, Keith Thompson
      • Re: New to Programming, Joe Wright
      • Re: New to Programming, arnuld
      • Re: New to Programming, arnuld
      • [OT] Re: New to Programming, Flash Gordon
      • Re: [OT] Re: New to Programming, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] Re: New to Programming, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: New to Programming, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: New to Programming, Keith Thompson
      • Re: New to Programming, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: New to Programming, Malcolm
  • Re: New to Programming, arnuld
• A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Odinn
  • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), michael . kirby
  • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Odinn
  • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), CBFalconer
    • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), fermineutron
      • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Barry Schwarz
      • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), CBFalconer
      • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Keith Thompson
  • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: A simple program , need to see where's the mistake :), Andrew Poelstra
• bit position, Serve Laurijssen
  • Re: bit position, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: bit position, Giorgio Silvestri
  • Re: bit position, Serve Laurijssen
    • Re: bit position, Eric Sosman
      • Re: bit position, Eric Sosman
    • Re: bit position, Simon Biber
  • Re: bit position, Nishu
  • Re: bit position, Ico
  • Re: bit position, Hallvard B Furuseth
    • Re: bit position, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bit position, Hallvard B Furuseth
• Stack and Queue, raghu
  • Re: Stack and Queue, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Stack and Queue, michael . kirby
  • Re: Stack and Queue, Malcolm
    • Re: Stack and Queue, CBFalconer
• how to fabricate a good computer, lasaihome
  • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, jmcgill
    • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, CBFalconer
  • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, Richard Bos
  • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: how to fabricate a good computer, Clever Monkey
• fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
  • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
  • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Jordan Abel
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, CBFalconer
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Chris Torek
  • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Serve Laurijssen
    • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, David Mathog
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Jordan Abel
    • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: fclose then fopen equivalent for stdout?, CBFalconer
• C code to calculate gradient of a function, Olw
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Clever Monkey
    • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Olw
      • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, William Hughes
      • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Olw
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, CBFalconer
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Bill Pursell
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, dcorbit
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, xhunga
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Olw
  • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, David Wade
    • Re: C code to calculate gradient of a function, Olw
• getchar, CDROOM
  • Re: getchar, mark_bluemel
  • Re: getchar, jmcgill
    • Re: getchar, CDROOM
    • Re: getchar, CDROOM
  • Re: getchar, Baishampayan Ghose
• Another Mersenne Twister question, Simon
  • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
    • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Simon
    • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Jack Klein
      • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, fermineutron
  • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, websnarf
    • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, CBFalconer
    • Re: Another Mersenne Twister question, Keith Thompson
• Printing bitmap on HP Printer, Yann KERNIN
  • Re: Printing bitmap on HP Printer, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Printing bitmap on HP Printer, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Printing bitmap on HP Printer, Keith Thompson
• Source code reverse engineering with graphviz output., bradphelan
  • Re: Source code reverse engineering with graphviz output., bradphelan
• EOF Question, jobo
  • Re: EOF Question, Simon Biber
    • Re: EOF Question, Simon Biber
  • Re: EOF Question, Andrew Poelstra
• Detecting EOF, jobo
  • Re: Detecting EOF, Papastefanos Serafeim
  • Re: Detecting EOF, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: Detecting EOF, Richard Heathfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Detecting EOF, jobo
• File handling with structures problem, Rav
  • Re: File handling with structures problem, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: File handling with structures problem, Jack Klein
• Strange Behaviour of this function, g.ankush1@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
      • Things you aren't allowed to say (Was: Strange Behaviour of this function), Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, CBFalconer
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, raghu
    • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, mark_bluemel
    • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, raghu
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Strange Behaviour of this function, Chris Dollin
• Behavior of logical or, michaelp
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, Conor Hughes
    • Re: Behavior of logical or, michaelp
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
    • Re: Behavior of logical or, michaelp
      • Re: Behavior of logical or, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Behavior of logical or, michaelp
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, Rachael
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: Behavior of logical or, Kenneth Brody
• Finding the Integers Question, jobo
  • Re: Finding the Integers Question, T.M. Sommers
    • Re: Finding the Integers Question, jobo
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, T.M. Sommers
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, hookah_frog
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Simon Biber
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Default User
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, hookah_frog
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Robert Latest
    • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Robert Latest
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Finding the Integers Question, Simon Biber
• ( ) -> operators associativity confused, bochengnever
  • Re: ( ) -> operators associativity confused, Eric Sosman
  • Re: ( ) -> operators associativity confused, Andrey Tarasevich
• C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, VijaKhara
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, Dr_Locke_Z2A
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, CBFalconer
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, Robert Latest
    • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: C in Linux vs C in Windows, is there any difference?, David Wade
• C compiler and editor, marco . delvecchio
  • Re: C compiler and editor, Mitsteig
  • Re: C compiler and editor, Simon Biber
  • Re: C compiler and editor, Tom St Denis
  • Re: C compiler and editor, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: C compiler and editor, CBFalconer
  • Re: C compiler and editor, jussij
• unsigned char, FlyingBird
  • Re: unsigned char, Clark S. Cox III
    • Re: unsigned char, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: unsigned char, CBFalconer
  • Re: unsigned char, Bill Medland
    • Re: unsigned char, Eric Sosman
      • Re: unsigned char, Bill Medland
      • Re: unsigned char, Eric Sosman
    • Re: unsigned char, Clark S. Cox III
  • Re: unsigned char, cassius
  • Re: unsigned char, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: unsigned char, Jack Klein
    • Re: unsigned char, CBFalconer
      • Re: unsigned char, Harald van Dijk
• general array in C, Cyn
  • Re: general array in C, jacob navia
  • Re: general array in C, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: general array in C, jacob navia
      • Re: general array in C, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: general array in C, Bart
    • Re: general array in C, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: general array in C, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: general array in C, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: general array in C, pete
    • Re: general array in C, Simon Biber
      • Re: general array in C, Cyn
      • Re: general array in C, Laurent Deniau
    • Re: general array in C, jacob navia
  • Re: general array in C, Bart
  • Re: general array in C, Laurent Deniau
    • Re: general array in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: general array in C, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: general array in C, Keith Thompson
  • Re: general array in C, Michal Nazarewicz
    • Re: general array in C, Laurent Deniau
• how to allocate memory to a member at run time, raghu
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member at run time, mark_bluemel
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member at run time, thunder1
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member at run time, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member at run time, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member at run time, CBFalconer
• how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, raghu
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, raghu
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, mark_bluemel
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, CBFalconer
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, mark_bluemel
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, mark_bluemel
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Richard Bos
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Michal Nazarewicz
      • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: how to allocate memory to a member dynamically, Andrew Poelstra
• How to reverse a Unsigned Char??, ranjanmg1
  • Re: How to reverse a Unsigned Char??, mark_bluemel
  • Re: How to reverse a Unsigned Char??, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: How to reverse a Unsigned Char??, Jordan Abel
  • Re: How to reverse a Unsigned Char??, pete
• block in open(), freegnu
  • Re: block in open(), Nick Keighley
  • Re: block in open(), Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: block in open(), CBFalconer
    • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), CBFalconer
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Richard Bos
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Richard Bos
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Richard Bos
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), CBFalconer
      • Re: block in open(), CBFalconer
      • Re: block in open(), riedel
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), CBFalconer
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
      • Re: block in open(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: block in open(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: block in open(), Jordan Abel
• C standard, xdevel
  • Re: C standard, jmcgill
    • Re: C standard, xdevel
      • Re: C standard, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: C standard, Elijah Cardon
• is it possible to run a C program from batch file., sjayaramit
  • Re: is it possible to run a C program from batch file., Cinder6
  • Re: is it possible to run a C program from batch file., pankaj
  • Re: is it possible to run a C program from batch file., Mark McIntyre
    • Re: is it possible to run a C program from batch file., pete
  • Re: is it possible to run a C program from batch file., Simon Biber
• c PROGRAMMERS--READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT YOURSELF, Google Questions
• Doubts on Array Size, Harry
  • Re: Doubts on Array Size, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: Doubts on Array Size, mark_bluemel
• initializer element is not constant, Paul Edwards
  • Re: initializer element is not constant, Paul Edwards
    • Re: initializer element is not constant, Jack Klein
      • Re: initializer element is not constant, Paul Edwards
      • Re: initializer element is not constant, pete
      • Re: initializer element is not constant, Keith Thompson
      • Re: initializer element is not constant, Paul Edwards
  • Re: initializer element is not constant, Jack Klein
• Highest Common Factor, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Highest Common Factor, nachch
    • Re: Highest Common Factor, gw7rib
  • Re: Highest Common Factor, bert
  • Re: Highest Common Factor, Julian V. Noble
  • Re: Highest Common Factor, Afghan Hound
  • Re: Highest Common Factor, Elijah Cardon
    • Re: Highest Common Factor, mensanator@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Highest Common Factor, Elijah Cardon
  • Message not available
    • Re: Highest Common Factor, Harald van Dijk
• Evaluation order of assignment statement, nachch
  • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, John Smith
  • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Walter Roberson
  • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, nachch
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, nachch
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Chris Torek
      • Re: Evaluation order of assignment statement, Walter Roberson
• memcpy() problem, danu
  • Re: memcpy() problem, Walter Roberson
    • Re: memcpy() problem, danu
      • Re: memcpy() problem, Walter Roberson
      • Re: memcpy() problem, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: memcpy() problem, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: memcpy() problem, Bill Medland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • memcpy() problem, danu
• address after end of array?, Serve Laurijssen
  • Re: address after end of array?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: address after end of array?, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: address after end of array?, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: address after end of array?, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: address after end of array?, Jean-Marc Bourguet
• realloc but not copy, ivan . leben
  • Re: realloc but not copy, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: realloc but not copy, Al Balmer
  • Re: realloc but not copy, websnarf
    • Re: realloc but not copy, CBFalconer
      • Re: realloc but not copy, James Antill
      • Re: realloc but not copy, CBFalconer
  • Re: realloc but not copy, Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: realloc but not copy, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: realloc but not copy, Eric Sosman
    • Re: realloc but not copy, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: realloc but not copy, Eric Sosman
      • Re: realloc but not copy, Scott Fluhrer
      • Re: realloc but not copy, Al Balmer
  • LOW INTELLIGENCE ALERT, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: LOW INTELLIGENCE ALERT, Scott Fluhrer
      • Re: LOW INTELLIGENCE ALERT, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: LOW INTELLIGENCE ALERT, Robert Latest
  • Re: realloc but not copy, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: realloc but not copy, websnarf
• verify float number, Xancatal
  • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
    • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, Keith Thompson
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Ian Collins
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: verify float number, CBFalconer
      • Re: verify float number, Richard Tobin
      • Re: verify float number, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: verify float number, Chris Torek
  • Re: verify float number, CBFalconer
    • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Nick Keighley
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, CBFalconer
      • Re: verify float number, Bill Medland
      • Re: verify float number, jmcgill
  • Re: verify float number, Neil
    • Re: verify float number, Xancatal
      • Re: verify float number, Keith Thompson
  • Re: verify float number, av
    • Re: verify float number, Nick Keighley
  • Re: verify float number, John Bode
• POSIX system() call return value, jensthiede
  • Re: POSIX system() call return value, Igmar Palsenberg
    • Re: POSIX system() call return value, jensthiede
    • Re: POSIX system() call return value, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: POSIX system() call return value, Keith Thompson
• Please help me spot the difference, Andreas Vinther
  • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Christian MOENNE-LOCCOZ
  • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Ico
  • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Papastefanos Serafeim
    • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Richard Bos
    • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Andreas
      • Re: Please help me spot the difference, Jens Thoms Toerring
• grammar files for a shell, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: grammar files for a shell, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: grammar files for a shell, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: grammar files for a shell, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: grammar files for a shell, Rod Pemberton
• Endian revisited, Sheldon
  • Re: Endian revisited, Robert Latest
    • Re: Endian revisited, CBFalconer
      • Re: Endian revisited, Robert Latest
      • Re: Endian revisited, Bill Medland
    • Re: Endian revisited, Sheldon
  • Re: Endian revisited, Bill Medland
    • Re: Endian revisited, Sheldon
  • Re: Endian revisited, Thad Smith
  • Re: Endian revisited, Nick Keighley
• Re: is the compiler displaying logical or linear address value?, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
• help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, spidey12345
  • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, Simon Biber
    • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, spidey12345
      • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, Keith Thompson
      • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, Simon Biber
      • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, spidey12345
      • Re: help with linklist with I/O file, and word node, Bill Pursell
• Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Rav
  • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Thad Smith
    • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, CBFalconer
      • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, CBFalconer
      • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Please help me overcome the segmentation fault, Simon Biber
• c & time problem, RVO
  • Re: c & time problem, Ian Collins
    • Re: c & time problem, RVO
      • Re: c & time problem, Ian Collins
      • Re: c & time problem, Ian Collins
      • Re: c & time problem, RVO
      • Re: c & time problem, CBFalconer
      • Re: c & time problem, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: c & time problem, RVO
  • Re: c & time problem, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: c & time problem, Nick Keighley
• what's wrong with the macro, DaVinci
  • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Malcolm
    • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Giorgio Silvestri
  • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Giorgio Silvestri
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, pete
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Walter Roberson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, pete
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Eric Sosman
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Richard Tobin
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Richard Tobin
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Chris Dollin
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Clark S. Cox III
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, CBFalconer
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: what's wrong with the macro, Keith Thompson
• "K&R" C, msdos6
  • Re: "K&R" C, Ian Collins
    • Re: "K&R" C, msdos6
      • Re: "K&R" C, Ian Collins
  • Re: "K&R" C, Keith Thompson
    • Re: "K&R" C, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: "K&R" C, jmcgill
  • Re: "K&R" C, mkaras
    • Re: "K&R" C, msdos6
    • Re: "K&R" C, jmcgill
      • Re: "K&R" C, gw7rib
      • Re: "K&R" C, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: "K&R" C, CBFalconer
    • Re: "K&R" C, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: "K&R" C, Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: "K&R" C, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: "K&R" C, msdos6
• How to simulate a clock?, cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to simulate a clock?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: How to simulate a clock?, Malcolm
• Next-Generation Laptop Computer Systems, Joe
• char as array index gives warning in gcc, Eugene Rice
  • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, young
    • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Keith Thompson
  • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Rg
    • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Eugene Rice
      • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Eric Sosman
  • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Malcolm
    • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Keith Thompson
      • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Malcolm
  • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Jack Klein
    • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Eugene Rice
      • Re: char as array index gives warning in gcc, Keith Thompson
• " As a feather floats by lonely lies silent ", U S Contractors Offering Service A Non-profit
• Extremely pedantic, but however..., Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Malcolm
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Skarmander
    • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., CBFalconer
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., CBFalconer
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Samuel Stearley
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Skarmander
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., SM Ryan
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., jacob navia
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Samuel Stearley
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., jacob navia
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Eric Sosman
    • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Elijah Cardon
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., websnarf
  • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., ozbear
    • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Extremely pedantic, but however..., Frederick Gotham
• Change Variable in Server, javiercubre
  • Re: Change Variable in Server, dcorbit
• host association, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: host association, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: host association, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: host association, Walter Roberson
    • Re: host association, Elijah Cardon
• how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, jeffpierce12
  • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Michael
  • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Mike Wahler
    • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Mike Wahler
      • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
      • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
  • Re: how to print ASCII "ETX" character?, SM Ryan
• Seg faults in merge and quick sort, ralphedge
  • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, Mike Wahler
  • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, dcorbit
    • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, ralphedge
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, pete
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, CBFalconer
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, ralphedge
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, Ian Collins
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, CBFalconer
  • Re: Seg faults in merge and quick sort, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Storing large number of values in 2D array, rajus
  • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, dcorbit
      • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, dcorbit
      • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, William Hughes
      • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, jacob navia
    • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, Al Balmer
      • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, jacob navia
  • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, dcorbit
  • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, dcorbit
  • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: Storing large number of values in 2D array, Al Balmer
• automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, smachin1000
  • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
    • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Al Balmer
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Bright
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Bright
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Bright
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Ian Collins
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, CBFalconer
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Bright
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Don Porges
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Neil
    • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, jaysome
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, CBFalconer
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, CBFalconer
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, CBFalconer
      • Re: automatically remove unused #includes from C source?, Paul Connolly
• problem with return, Sheldon
  • Re: problem with return, Bill Pursell
    • Re: problem with return, Sheldon
  • Re: problem with return, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: problem with return, Sheldon
      • Re: problem with return, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: problem with return, Sheldon
  • Re: problem with return, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: problem with return, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: problem with return, W H G
• pointer & reference question, Wavelet
  • Re: pointer & reference question, T.M. Sommers
• string constant, chandanlinster
  • Re: string constant, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: string constant, Keith Thompson
    • Re: string constant, Ian Collins
      • Re: string constant, Keith Thompson
      • Re: string constant, Eric Sosman
      • Re: string constant, Keith Thompson
• va_copy, Laurent Deniau
• closing stdout, Paul Edwards
  • Re: closing stdout, Cong Wang
    • Re: closing stdout, Bill Pursell
  • Re: closing stdout, Richard Bos
    • Re: closing stdout, Hallvard B Furuseth
    • Re: closing stdout, Paul Edwards
      • Re: closing stdout, Keith Thompson
      • Re: closing stdout, CBFalconer
      • Re: closing stdout, Eric Sosman
• How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, anuragkhanna8
  • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Nick Keighley
  • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Ico
  • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Simon Biber
  • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Bart
    • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Simon Biber
  • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, christian
    • Re: How to convert 16 - bit 565 rgb value to 32 bit, Bart
• Why is this cast nessasary, Neil
  • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Neil
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Neil
  • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Thad Smith
    • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Neil
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Thad Smith
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, CBFalconer
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Why is this cast nessasary, Neil
• How to remove // comments, jacob navia
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: How to remove // comments, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Bos
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jordan Abel
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Roberson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Jalapeno
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Old Wolf
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Keith Thompson
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
    • Re: How to remove // comments, Bart
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Bart
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Bart
      • Re: How to remove // comments, Walter Bright
  • Re: How to remove // comments, Andrey Koptyaev
    • Re: How to remove // comments, jacob navia
  • Re: How to remove // comments, jxh
    • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to remove // comments, jxh
      • Re: How to remove // comments, CBFalconer
      • Cloaking C source (was: How to remove // comments), CBFalconer
      • Re: Cloaking C source (was: How to remove // comments), jxh
      • Re: Cloaking C source (was: How to remove // comments), CBFalconer
• fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, David Mathog
  • Re: fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: fread 1 byte x N vs N bytes x 1, Richard Heathfield
• Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, David Mathog
  • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Chris Torek
  • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Walter Roberson
  • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
    • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
    • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, CBFalconer
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, CBFalconer
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Malcolm
    • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Malcolm
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, Malcolm
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, CBFalconer
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, James Antill
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, CBFalconer
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, websnarf
      • Re: Language standard: the least common denominator vs. utility, CBFalconer
• Reverse a string, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Reverse a string, dcorbit
  • Re: Reverse a string, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Reverse a string, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Reverse a string, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Reverse a string, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Reverse a string, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Reverse a string, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Reverse a string, Simon Biber
      • Re: Reverse a string, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Reverse a string, dcorbit
  • Re: Reverse a string, CBFalconer
• FILE pointer, rajus
  • Re: FILE pointer, hbn
    • Re: FILE pointer, rajus
      • Re: FILE pointer, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: FILE pointer, Keith Thompson
      • Re: FILE pointer, CBFalconer
      • Re: FILE pointer, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: FILE pointer, Richard Bos
  • Re: FILE pointer, Nick Keighley
    • Re: FILE pointer, Keith Thompson
      • Re: FILE pointer, Nick Keighley
      • Re: FILE pointer, CBFalconer
      • Which standards do the implementation support?, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Which standards do the implementation support?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Which standards do the implementation support?, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Which standards do the implementation support?, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] Which standards do the implementation support?, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Which standards do the implementation support?, Chris Torek
      • Re: Which standards do the implementation support?, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: FILE pointer, Kenneth Brody
• macro and function, dis_is_eagle
  • Re: macro and function, Richard Bos
    • Re: macro and function, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: macro and function, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: macro and function, Walter Roberson
• God wonders, and has questions for all those fallen soldiers...., snowsgood
  • Re: God wonders, and has questions for all those fallen soldiers...., Kenny McCormack
• C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, gavino
  • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, martdi
    • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Paul Connolly
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Ian Collins
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Paul Connolly
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Paul Connolly
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Charlton Wilbur
    • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, websnarf
      • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Ian Collins
  • Re: C application server vs ruby on rails or turbogears, Ian Collins
• what is th deffirence, CDROOM
  • Re: what is th deffirence, Keith Thompson
  • Re: what is th deffirence, Clever Monkey
    • Re: what is th deffirence, Richard Bos
      • Re: what is th deffirence, Clever Monkey
      • Re: what is th deffirence, Richard Bos
    • Re: what is th deffirence, Duncan Muirhead
• stack pointer and frame pointer, code break
  • Re: stack pointer and frame pointer, Walter Roberson
  • Re: stack pointer and frame pointer, jmcgill
    • Re: stack pointer and frame pointer, Walter Roberson
  • Re: stack pointer and frame pointer, Keith Thompson
• const array of const pointers as a parameter, Spoon
  • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, Darko
  • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, arne
  • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, lawrence . jones
  • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, A. Bolmarcich
  • Re: const array of const pointers as a parameter, John Bode
• Please help, raghu
  • Re: Please help, Richard
    • Re: Please help, mark_bluemel
      • Re: Please help, Richard
      • Re: Please help, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Please help, raghu
  • Re: Please help, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Please help, Richard
  • Re: Please help, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Please help, Norm Mann
  • Re: Please help, Andrew Poelstra
• inline functions vs. macros, Robert Seacord
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Darko
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Pedro Graca
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ian Collins
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, John Bode
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ian Collins
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ian Collins
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ian Collins
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Robert Seacord
  • Re: inline functions vs. macros, websnarf
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Keith Thompson
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Tobin
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Tobin
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Richard Tobin
      • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Keith Thompson
    • Re: inline functions vs. macros, Hallvard B Furuseth
• Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
  • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), neilyoungest
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Coos Haak
  • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Al Balmer
  • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), J. J. Farrell
    • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Sjouke Burry
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Kenneth Brody
    • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), CBFalconer
    • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
    • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987), scott
• offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Pawel
  • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Richard Bos
    • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Default User
      • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Richard Bos
      • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Keith Thompson
      • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Default User
  • Re: offsetof macro and non-POD structures. Solution., Martin Ambuhl
• why typedef is storeage class specifier, sunny
  • Re: why typedef is storeage class specifier, Eric Sosman
• How to check for undefined variables., Grand-Master
  • Re: How to check for undefined variables., Ian Collins
  • Re: How to check for undefined variables., Nick Keighley
  • Re: How to check for undefined variables., Greg
  • Re: How to check for undefined variables., J. J. Farrell
• Re: I am better than you cause I'm GENIOUS., Richard Bos
• Reversal of binary int in C, gsl
  • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, gsl
      • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, Richard Bos
  • Re: Reversal of binary int in C, jmcgill
• void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: void func () returning value?, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, mark_bluemel
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, mark_bluemel
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Richard Bos
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Richard Bos
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Richard Harter
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: void func () returning value?, William Hughes
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: void func () returning value?, William Hughes
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: void func () returning value?, William Hughes
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Al Balmer
    • Re: void func () returning value?, Richard
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Elijah Cardon
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: void func () returning value?, Andrey Tarasevich
• writing to a file prior to system crash, benjamin . krulewitch
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, jmcgill
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Jack Klein
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Simon Biber
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Richard
    • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, CBFalconer
      • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Richard
      • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Al Balmer
      • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Keith Thompson
      • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, jaysome
    • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Al Balmer
  • Re: writing to a file prior to system crash, Dave Thompson
• Lib? information about the header files., Bert
  • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Chris Johnson
    • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Bert
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Chris Johnson
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Al Balmer
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Bert
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Al Balmer
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., CBFalconer
      • Re: Lib? information about the header files., Bert
• infinite loop with scanf, Michael Goerz
  • Re: infinite loop with scanf, Jack Klein
  • Re: infinite loop with scanf, Fred Kleinschmidt
    • Re: infinite loop with scanf, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: infinite loop with scanf, CBFalconer
• cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, David Mathog
  • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, David Mathog
    • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, David Mathog
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Al Balmer
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, David Mathog
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Default User
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Al Balmer
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Default User
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Richard
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Al Balmer
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Richard
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Al Balmer
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Igmar Palsenberg
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, Richard Bos
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, CBFalconer
      • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, jmcgill
  • Re: cuserid returns original login after a su to another user, jmcgill
• Job Opportunity in C in Kansas, nischke
  • Re: Job Opportunity in C in Kansas, Keith Thompson
• using a freed pointer, Serve Laurijssen
  • Re: using a freed pointer, Clark S. Cox III
    • Re: using a freed pointer, Ian Malone
    • Re: using a freed pointer, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: using a freed pointer, Clark S. Cox III
  • Re: using a freed pointer, Richard Bos
  • Re: using a freed pointer, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: using a freed pointer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: using a freed pointer, pete
• How to study program language well, JunDa . Huang
  • Re: How to study program language well, Nick Keighley
  • Re: How to study program language well, jmcgill
    • Re: How to study program language well, Richard
  • Re: How to study program language well, David Wade
    • Re: How to study program language well, jmcgill
      • Re: How to study program language well, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: How to study program language well, keith_emerson
      • Re: How to study program language well, dbtid
  • Re: How to study program language well, v4vijayakumar
    • Re: How to study program language well, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to study program language well, jmcgill
      • Re: How to study program language well, Richard Heathfield
      • [OT] universities and students, v4vijayakumar
      • Re: [OT] universities and students, Joe Wright
      • [OT] universities and students, v4vijayakumar
      • Re: How to study program language well, Malcolm
    • Re: How to study program language well, Richard Bos
• implementation of a shell, glmlima
  • Re: implementation of a shell, mark_bluemel
    • Re: implementation of a shell, glmlima
      • Re: implementation of a shell, Keith Thompson
  • Re: implementation of a shell, Tom St Denis
• how can I get warning ?, DaVinci
  • Re: how can I get warning ?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: how can I get warning ?, DaVinci
      • Re: how can I get warning ?, Tom St Denis
  • Re: how can I get warning ?, Joe Wright
    • Re: how can I get warning ?, Keith Thompson
• Msc thesis- help required, shawn
  • Re: Msc thesis- help required, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: Msc thesis- help required, Richard
      • Re: Msc thesis- help required, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Msc thesis- help required, Default User
      • Re: Msc thesis- help required, Keith Thompson
• pointer arithmetic help, priyanka
  • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Ian Collins
  • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Chris Johnson
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, priyanka
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Ian Collins
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Chris Johnson
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Richard
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Simon Biber
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Chris Johnson
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Bill Medland
      • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Keith Thompson
  • Re: pointer arithmetic help, sandy
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Default User
  • Re: pointer arithmetic help, sandy
  • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Joe Wright
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • pointer arithmetic help, priyanka
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Walter Roberson
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Thad Smith
  • pointer arithmetic help, priyanka
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Roger Scudder
    • Re: pointer arithmetic help, Uncle_Jed
• Books about computer geeks?, rick
  • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Richard
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, William Hughes
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Richard
      • [OT] Re: Books about computer geeks?, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: [OT] Re: Books about computer geeks?, Richard
      • Re: [OT] Re: Books about computer geeks?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, William Hughes
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, William Hughes
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • [ot]Re: Books about computer geeks?, pete
  • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Chris Johnson
  • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Bob Martin
    • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Clever Monkey
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Richard Bos
    • Re: Books about computer geeks?, Clever Monkey
• plotting Graphs how to in C ?, Vivek
  • Re: plotting Graphs how to in C ?, santosh
    • Re: plotting Graphs how to in C ?, dcorbit
• XPath with Xalan-C, MV84
  • Re: XPath with Xalan-C, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: XPath with Xalan-C, MV84
• Pointers...once again, mdh
  • Re: Pointers...once again, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Pointers...once again, CBFalconer
      • Re: Pointers...once again, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Pointers...once again, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Pointers...once again, Rg
    • Re: Pointers...once again, mdh
    • Re: Pointers...once again, Joe Wright
  • Re: Pointers...once again, Richard
    • Re: Pointers...once again, mdh
  • Re: Pointers...once again, santosh
    • Re: Pointers...once again, mdh
  • Re: Pointers...once again, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Pointers...once again, mdh
    • Re: Pointers...once again, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Pointers...once again, Richard
    • Re: Pointers...once again, Dave Thompson
  • Re: Pointers...once again, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• please check, raghu
  • Re: please check, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: please check, Richard
  • Re: please check, jwalker
  • Re: please check, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: please check, Nick Keighley
  • Re: please check, santosh
    • Re: please check, raghu
    • Re: please check, Keith Thompson
  • Re: please check, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: please check, Andrew Poelstra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • please check, raghu
    • Re: please check, mark_bluemel
    • Re: please check, Andrew Poelstra
• Comparing Pointer, sebastien . fricker
  • Re: Comparing Pointer, Richard Bos
  • Re: Comparing Pointer, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Comparing Pointer, Ike Naar
• what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Omats.Z
  • Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Nick Keighley
  • Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Richard
  • Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, John Bode
    • Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Omats.Z
• newer to c, sudhakar@infosys india.
  • Re: newer to c, Richard
  • Re: newer to c, John Bode
  • Re: newer to c, santosh
    • Re: newer to c, Richard
      • Re: newer to c, santosh
    • Re: newer to c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: newer to c, mdh
  • Re: newer to c, mdh
    • Re: newer to c, Keith Thompson
    • Re: newer to c, Ian Collins
      • Re: newer to c, mdh
  • Re: newer to c, mark_bluemel
  • Re: newer to c, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: newer to c, jmcgill
    • Re: newer to c, CBFalconer
• why Typedef is storage class specifier?, sunny
  • Re: why Typedef is storage class specifier?, Keith Thompson
• number of bits for an int type, evangeli
  • Re: number of bits for an int type, santosh
    • Re: number of bits for an int type, evangeli
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, santosh
  • Re: number of bits for an int type, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: number of bits for an int type, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Richard
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Keith Thompson
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Walter Roberson
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: number of bits for an int type, CBFalconer
    • Re: number of bits for an int type, Keith Thompson
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Joe Wright
      • Re: number of bits for an int type, Keith Thompson
• stack overflow exception, samuraign
  • Re: stack overflow exception, Ian Collins
  • Re: stack overflow exception, Walter Roberson
    • Re: stack overflow exception, samuraign
      • Re: stack overflow exception, santosh
  • Re: stack overflow exception, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Efficiency of the for loop, vamshi
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ian Collins
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard Bos
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, shaanxxx
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh
  • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, free4trample
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
    • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard Bos
      • Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard
• Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, FireHead
  • Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, mkaras
  • Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, santosh
  • Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, Old Wolf
• Re: reading a file [OT], Dave Thompson
• strptime() in linux, Wavelet
  • Re: strptime() in linux, Flash Gordon
    • Re: strptime() in linux, Kurt Weber
      • Re: strptime() in linux, Richard
      • Re: strptime() in linux, Flash Gordon
      • Re: strptime() in linux, Keith Thompson
  • Re: strptime() in linux, Richard
• C newbie in a jam, Sheldon
  • Re: C newbie in a jam, Bill Pursell
    • Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon
  • Re: C newbie in a jam, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: C newbie in a jam, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon
      • Re: C newbie in a jam, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon
      • Re: C newbie in a jam, Old Wolf
• function declarations, conrad
  • Re: function declarations, Eric Sosman
• Recursive question., mdh
  • Re: Recursive question., Kurt Weber
    • Re: Recursive question., mdh
    • Re: Recursive question., jacob navia
  • Re: Recursive question., Eric Sosman
    • Re: Recursive question., mdh
• A question about fscanf and feof !, ehui928
  • Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, Registered User
    • Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, ehui928
  • Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, Joe Wright
• Remove extra blanks, Registered User
  • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
    • Re: Remove extra blanks, Joe Wright
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Registered User
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
  • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard
    • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Registered User
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Remove extra blanks, Thad Smith
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Thad Smith
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Remove extra blanks, jacob navia
    • Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample
      • Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard Heathfield
• strange behaviour, gribouille
  • Re: strange behaviour, Ico
    • Re: strange behaviour, gribouille
      • Re: strange behaviour, Ico
      • Re: strange behaviour, gribouille
      • Re: strange behaviour, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: strange behaviour, gribouille
      • Re: strange behaviour, CBFalconer
      • Re: strange behaviour, Steven Kirby
      • Re: strange behaviour, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: strange behaviour, Richard Bos
      • Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strange behaviour, Ico
      • Re: strange behaviour, Chris Torek
      • Re: strange behaviour, CBFalconer
      • Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: strange behaviour, Richard Bos
      • Re: strange behaviour, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: strange behaviour, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: strange behaviour, Bart
      • Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson
• Re: Help me with Concatenating strings, Chris Torek
• Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, jerry
  • Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, Chris Johnson
  • Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, CBFalconer
  • Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, jerry
• A simple parser, jacob navia
  • Re: A simple parser, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
  • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Ian Collins
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, zebedee
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Ian Collins
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Bob Martin
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Old Wolf
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Old Wolf
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Bill Pursell
      • Re: A simple parser, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Malcolm
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A simple parser, Cong Wang
  • Re: A simple parser, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Spiro Trikaliotis
    • Re: A simple parser, CBFalconer
    • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A simple parser, jacob navia
    • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, CBFalconer
      • Re: A simple parser, Bill Pursell
      • Re: A simple parser, CBFalconer
      • Re: A simple parser, Flash Gordon
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Tobin
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, CBFalconer
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Joe Wright
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A simple parser, Richard
      • Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A simple parser, jacob navia
• MD5, skibud2
  • Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: MD5, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: MD5, CBFalconer
      • Re: MD5, Nick Keighley
  • Re: MD5, Richard
    • Re: MD5, Old Wolf
      • Re: MD5, Richard
      • Re: MD5, Keith Thompson
      • Re: MD5, websnarf
      • Re: MD5, Richard
      • Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: MD5, Richard
      • Re: MD5, Keith Thompson
      • Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: MD5, Richard Bos
      • Re: MD5, CBFalconer
      • Re: MD5, Keith Thompson
      • Re: MD5, Keith Thompson
• using c with html interface, Vivek
  • Re: using c with html interface, Tom St Denis
    • Re: using c with html interface, Vivek
      • Re: using c with html interface, Ico
  • Re: using c with html interface, mbstevens
  • Re: using c with html interface, Keith Thompson
  • Re: using c with html interface, Brian C
• Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon
  • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Tom St Denis
    • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Richard
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Richard Bos
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon
      • Re: Understanding fwrite(), Keith Thompson
• Designing a scandisk tye utility, amit
  • Re: Designing a scandisk tye utility, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Designing a scandisk tye utility, CBFalconer
  • Re: Designing a scandisk tye utility, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Designing a scandisk tye utility, s12e9888
• Segmentation fault, Sheldon
  • Re: Segmentation fault, jacob navia
    • Re: Segmentation fault, Sheldon
      • Re: Segmentation fault, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Segmentation fault, Sheldon
      • Re: Segmentation fault, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Segmentation fault, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Segmentation fault, jmcgill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • segmentation fault, priyanka
    • Re: segmentation fault, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: segmentation fault, priyanka
    • Re: segmentation fault, CBFalconer
      • Re: segmentation fault, Keith Thompson
      • Re: segmentation fault, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: segmentation fault, Keith Thompson
      • Re: segmentation fault, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: segmentation fault, Old Wolf
• Application of Searching, muthu
  • Re: Application of Searching, Keith Thompson
• Lvalues and Rvalues, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Lvalues and Rvalues, Brian C
  • Re: Lvalues and Rvalues, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Lvalues and Rvalues, SM Ryan
• why doesn't this recurse, kshudra
  • Re: why doesn't this recurse, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Norm Mann
  • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: why doesn't this recurse, kshudra
      • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Norm Mann
      • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: why doesn't this recurse, Walter Roberson
• Little program, mdh
  • Re: Little program, jmcgill
    • Re: Little program, mdh
      • Re: Little program, Bart
      • Re: Little program, mdh
      • Re: Little program, Bart
      • Re: Little program, mdh
      • Re: Little program, jmcgill
      • Re: Little program, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Little program, mdh
      • Re: Little program, jmcgill
      • Re: Little program, Bart
  • Re: Little program, jmcgill
    • Re: Little program, mdh
  • Re: Little program, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • answer, Chief
    • Re: answer, mdh
• Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Eric Sosman
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Malcolm
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Malcolm
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Old Wolf
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
  • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., dcorbit
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., dcorbit
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith
  • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., pete
    • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., dcorbit
      • Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Eric Sosman
• dual opteron prog. help, kingsolomon2000@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: dual opteron prog. help, Tom St Denis
  • Re: dual opteron prog. help, Clever Monkey
• Opening (MatLab) mat file from C, BrunoMiguelMatias
  • Re: Opening (MatLab) mat file from C, Tom St Denis
• Re: Number of digits in N!, jmcgill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Number of digits in N!, Bart Goddard
  • Re: Number of digits in N!, Willem
• _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
  • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, mark_bluemel
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Flash Gordon
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
  • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Old Wolf
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Bos
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Jordan Abel
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Paul Connolly
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, CBFalconer
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Bos
• Looking for C Compiler Performance Info, lxrocks
  • Re: Looking for C Compiler Performance Info, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Looking for C Compiler Performance Info, Rod Pemberton
• Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Linny
  • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, pete
      • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, pete
    • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Segmentation fault on 64 bit, Richard Heathfield
• RAW SOCKET, sethukr
  • Re: RAW SOCKET, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: RAW SOCKET, raxitsheth2000
    • Re: RAW SOCKET, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: RAW SOCKET, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: RAW SOCKET, Tom St Denis
    • Re: RAW SOCKET, ipnwsec
• distant compilation and float literals, Christian
  • Re: distant compilation and float literals, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: distant compilation and float literals, lxrocks
  • Re: distant compilation and float literals, William Hughes
    • Re: distant compilation and float literals, Christian
  • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, Christian MOENNE-LOCCOZ
    • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, William Hughes
      • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, William Hughes
      • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, William Hughes
      • Re: distant compilation and float literals . The solution, Jean-Marc Bourguet
• associativity and precedence, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: associativity and precedence, Tak-Shing Chan
  • Re: associativity and precedence, Chris Dollin
• malloc() and alignment, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: malloc() and alignment, Jean-Marc Bourguet
  • Re: malloc() and alignment, Flash Gordon
    • Re: malloc() and alignment, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: malloc() and alignment, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: malloc() and alignment, Eric Sosman
      • Re: malloc() and alignment, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: malloc() and alignment, Eric Sosman
  • Re: malloc() and alignment, Scorpio
    • Re: malloc() and alignment, Yevgen Muntyan
    • Re: malloc() and alignment, Keith Thompson
  • Re: malloc() and alignment, SM Ryan
  • Re: malloc() and alignment, Laurent Deniau
• pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Paul Connolly
  • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, CBFalconer
      • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Gordon Burditt
• Several openings for C Programmers ( Referal Bonus USD 1000), tr . sylvester
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Several openings for C Programmers ( Referal Bonus USD 1000), tr . sylvester
• Does strtok require a non-null token?, ryampolsky
  • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
  • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
    • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Default User
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Default User
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, raxitsheth2000
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, av
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Clever Monkey
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes
      • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, CBFalconer
• HOW To Compile C programs in VIM Editor ? [ HELP ], AntiVista
  • Re: HOW To Compile C programs in VIM Editor ? [ HELP ], Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: HOW To Compile C programs in VIM Editor ? [ HELP ], santosh
  • Re: HOW To Compile C programs in VIM Editor ? [ HELP ], jmcgill
• Re: printf for french chars, kaustubh . deo
• reordering fields, was: size_t in a struct, Mark L Pappin
• fprintf format specifiers, Harry
  • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: fprintf format specifiers, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: fprintf format specifiers, Tak-Shing Chan
    • Re: fprintf format specifiers, CBFalconer
• sequence points, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: sequence points, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: sequence points, Cong Wang
      • Re: sequence points, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: sequence points, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: sequence points, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sequence points, Richard Tobin
      • Re: sequence points, Dave Thompson
      • Re: sequence points, lawrence . jones
      • Re: sequence points, CBFalconer
      • Re: sequence points, Eric Sosman
      • Re: sequence points, Flash Gordon
      • Re: sequence points, CBFalconer
      • Re: sequence points, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sequence points, Charles Richmond
      • Re: sequence points, Keith Thompson
      • Re: sequence points, pete
      • Re: sequence points, Keith Thompson
  • Re: sequence points, Tejas Kokje
• multiplicative rule for asymptotic running times, john . casey
  • Re: multiplicative rule for asymptotic running times, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: multiplicative rule for asymptotic running times, john . casey
• Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), temper3243
  • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Arthur J. O'Dwyer
    • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Chris Torek
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Flash Gordon
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Dietmar Schindler
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), CBFalconer
    • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), temper3243
      • Re: Few doubts (wrong behaviour or correct ), Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• scanf help, Stu
  • Re: scanf help, jacob navia
  • Re: scanf help, Bill Reid
    • Re: scanf help, CBFalconer
      • Re: scanf help, Richard Tobin
• Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bob Martin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Al Balmer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Simon Biber
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Robert Latest
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Al Balmer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Al Balmer
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Thomas J. Gritzan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jmcgill
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: [OT] Garbage Collection in C, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: [OT] Garbage Collection in C, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: [OT] Garbage Collection in C, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Robert Latest
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Al Balmer
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Default User
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Friedrich Dominicus
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Garbage Collection in C, gw7rib
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Thomasson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Thomasson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Chris Thomasson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Bos
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, William Hughes
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Friedrich Dominicus
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Paul Connolly
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia
    • Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Bos
• Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Frank B.
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Hubble
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, William Hughes
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, santosh
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Frank B.
      • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, santosh
      • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Is there anyway to write a folders contents to file?, jmcgill
• good C impl of the hungarian algo?, soyspinoza
  • Re: good C impl of the hungarian algo?, Mark McIntyre
• find string functions source code, xdevel
  • Re: find string functions source code, mark_bluemel
    • Re: find string functions source code, xdevel
      • Re: find string functions source code, santosh
  • Re: find string functions source code, Clever Monkey
• Network Computers, Santy
  • Re: Network Computers, santosh
    • Re: Network Computers, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Network Computers, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Network Computers, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Network Computers, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Network Computers, Santy
    • Re: Network Computers, CBFalconer
  • Re: Network Computers, Ancient_Hacker
• string search and replace, int main(void)
  • Re: string search and replace, int main(void)
  • Re: string search and replace, int main(void)
  • Re: string search and replace, Chris Dollin
    • Re: string search and replace, int main(void)
      • Re: string search and replace, CBFalconer
• New Software Development Articles Directory, editormt
  • Re: New Software Development Articles Directory, CBFalconer
    • Re: New Software Development Articles Directory, Richard Bos
      • Re: New Software Development Articles Directory, Al Balmer
      • Re: New Software Development Articles Directory, Malcolm
• misaligned access clarification, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: misaligned access clarification, Chris Dollin
  • Re: misaligned access clarification, Gordon Burditt
• Stackless `protothreads' using computed goto's, aarklon
  • Re: Stackless `protothreads' using computed goto's, mark_bluemel
• how to write C pgm with some target!, ram
  • Re: how to write C pgm with some target!, santosh
  • Re: how to write C pgm with some target!, Malcolm
• pass-by-value, xdevel
  • Re: pass-by-value, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: pass-by-value, xdevel
      • Re: pass-by-value, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: pass-by-value, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: pass-by-value, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: pass-by-value, Chris Dollin
  • Re: pass-by-value, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: pass-by-value, xdevel
      • Re: pass-by-value, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: pass-by-value, av
      • Re: pass-by-value, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: pass-by-value, Chris Torek
      • Re: pass-by-value, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: pass-by-value, jmcgill
• IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, rohit
  • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, rohit
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, CBFalconer
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Bart
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IsBadWritePtr equivalent?, Spiro Trikaliotis
• DSDV protocol source code, sri
  • Re: DSDV protocol source code, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: DSDV protocol source code, Keith Thompson
    • Re: DSDV protocol source code, Kenny McCormack
• [OT] Some bad code I wrote the other day, Old Wolf
  • Re: Some bad code I wrote the other day, Cong Wang
  • Re: Some bad code I wrote the other day, Mudit Khetan
    • Re: Some bad code I wrote the other day, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Some bad code I wrote the other day, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Some bad code I wrote the other day, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: [OT] Some bad code I wrote the other day, Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order, Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order, Mudit Khetan
    • Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order, Keith Thompson
    • Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order, Chris Dollin
    • Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order, pete
      • "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order), Kenneth Brody
      • Re: "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order), Flash Gordon
      • Message not available
      • Re: "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order), Flash Gordon
      • Re: "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order), jmcgill
      • Re: "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluation order), Gordon Burditt
      • Re: "a=a++;" and nasal demons (was Re: strange behaviour / evaluationorder), Kenneth Brody
• Get everything you need for a successful Marketing Campaign Today!, dinesh
• Messing with intptr_t, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Messing with intptr_t, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Messing with intptr_t, SM Ryan
• allocate memory at predefined address, ampeloso
  • Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Walter Roberson
  • Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Simon Biber
  • Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: allocate memory at predefined address, jmcgill
• char data[0], aarklon
  • Re: char data[0], Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: char data[0], Jack Klein
    • Re: char data[0], Old Wolf
      • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
  • Re: char data[0], jmcgill
  • Re: char data[0], jmcgill
    • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], Chris Torek
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
      • Re: char data[0], Harald van Dijk
      • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
      • Re: char data[0], Harald van Dijk
      • Re: char data[0], Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], Chris Dollin
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], pete
      • Re: char data[0], Harald van Dijk
      • Re: char data[0], pete
      • Re: char data[0], Keith Thompson
      • Re: char data[0], CBFalconer
      • Re: char data[0], Bill Reid
      • Re: char data[0], jmcgill
      • Re: char data[0], Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: char data[0], Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: char data[0], Andrey Tarasevich
    • Re: char data[0], Dave Thompson
• MD5 in C for a micro, Ravi
  • Re: MD5 in C for a micro, Lowell Gilbert
  • Re: MD5 in C for a micro, dcorbit
• obfuscated, aarklon
  • Re: obfuscated, Mike Wahler
    • Re: obfuscated, Chris Dollin
    • Re: obfuscated, aarklon
      • Re: obfuscated, Thomas J. Gritzan
      • Re: obfuscated, dcorbit
      • Re: obfuscated, Clark S. Cox III
      • Re: obfuscated, dcorbit
      • Re: obfuscated, Clark S. Cox III
      • Re: obfuscated, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: obfuscated, Keith Thompson
    • Re: obfuscated, jmcgill
  • Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey
    • Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey
    • Re: obfuscated, jmcgill
      • Re: obfuscated, Richard Bos
      • Re: obfuscated, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: obfuscated, jmcgill
      • Re: obfuscated, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: obfuscated, Dave Thompson
      • Re: obfuscated, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: obfuscated, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: obfuscated, Simon Biber
      • Re: obfuscated, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: obfuscated, Simon Biber
    • Re: obfuscated, Flash Gordon
      • Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey
      • Re: obfuscated, Flash Gordon
  • Re: obfuscated, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: obfuscated, dcorbit
      • Re: obfuscated, Pedro Graca
      • Re: obfuscated, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: obfuscated, jmcgill
      • Re: obfuscated, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: obfuscated, Cong Wang
  • Re: obfuscated, Papastefanos Serafeim
  • Re: obfuscated, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: obfuscated, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: obfuscated, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: obfuscated, Dave Thompson
      • Re: obfuscated, lawrence . jones
  • Re: obfuscated, Simon Biber
• Multiple files, galt_57
  • Re: Multiple files, Cong Wang
    • Re: Multiple files, galt_57
      • Re: Multiple files, santosh
  • Re: Multiple files, Mark McIntyre
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Multiple files, Simon
  • Re: Multiple files, Keith Thompson
• corrupted double-linked list, oskar
  • Re: corrupted double-linked list, mark_bluemel
    • Re: corrupted double-linked list, Flash Gordon
      • Re: corrupted double-linked list, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: corrupted double-linked list, Flash Gordon
  • Re: corrupted double-linked list, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: corrupted double-linked list, Barry Schwarz
• Symbolic links, TK
  • Re: Symbolic links, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Symbolic links, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: Symbolic links, Cong Wang
  • Re: Symbolic links, TK
• confused problem, freegnu
  • Re: confused problem, Jordan Abel
  • Re: confused problem, jmcgill
• Artificial Mind - Part One - Basic Architecture and Cognitive Structure 1st Edition is now available (free download for Evaluation Edition), tommak
  • Re: Artificial Mind - Part One - Basic Architecture and Cognitive Structure 1st Edition is now available (free download for Evaluation Edition), Chris Dollin
• purge like utility in c, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: purge like utility in c, Eric Sosman
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: purge like utility in c, James Antill
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: purge like utility in c, jmcgill
  • Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
  • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
    • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Walter Roberson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Simon Biber
      • Re: purge like utility in c, tedu
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Bos
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Bos
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Al Balmer
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Mark McIntyre
      • [OT] Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: [OT] Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Bos
      • Re: [OT] Re: purge like utility in c, John McCallum
      • Re: [OT] Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Bos
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Dave Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
  • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Flash Gordon
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: purge like utility in c, gabs
  • Re: purge like utility in c, jmcgill
  • Re: purge like utility in c, EKB
• Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Jerret Johnson
  • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, jmcgill
    • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, jmcgill
  • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Roland Pibinger
  • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Ancient_Hacker
• Multithreading question, facugaich
  • Re: Multithreading question, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Multithreading question, facugaich
  • Re: Multithreading question, santosh
    • Re: Multithreading question, av
  • Re: Multithreading question, Ian Collins
  • Re: Multithreading question, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Multithreading question, Jordan Abel
      • Re: Multithreading question, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Multithreading question, facugaich
• text to binary, raghu
  • Re: text to binary, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: text to binary, raghu
      • Re: text to binary, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: text to binary, Keith Thompson
      • Re: text to binary, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: text to binary, raghu
      • Re: text to binary, jmcgill
      • Re: text to binary, santosh
      • Re: text to binary, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: text to binary, santosh
• What are the sequence points in a full expression?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What are the sequence points in a full expression?, Cong Wang
• print struct automaticly, katysei
  • Re: print struct automaticly, Richard Bos
    • Re: print struct automaticly, Chris Dollin
      • Re: print struct automaticly, Richard Bos
      • Re: print struct automaticly, Chris Dollin
  • Re: print struct automaticly, mark_bluemel
  • Re: print struct automaticly, Cong Wang
    • Re: print struct automaticly, jacob navia
      • Re: print struct automaticly [OT], Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: print struct automaticly [OT], jacob navia
      • Re: print struct automaticly [OT], Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: print struct automaticly, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: print struct automaticly, Keith Thompson
  • Re: print struct automaticly, Rod Pemberton
• Order of evaluation, int main(void)
  • Re: Order of evaluation, mark_bluemel
    • Re: Order of evaluation, int main(void)
      • Re: Order of evaluation, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Order of evaluation, mark_bluemel
      • Re: Order of evaluation, Thad Smith
    • Re: Order of evaluation, int main(void)
      • Re: Order of evaluation, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Order of evaluation, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Order of evaluation, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Order of evaluation, pete
• Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, chets
  • Re: Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, Flash Gordon
• Qry strlen ?, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Qry strlen ?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Qry strlen ?, Igmar Palsenberg
    • Re: Qry strlen ?, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Qry strlen ?, pete
    • Re: Qry strlen ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Qry strlen ?, James Antill
  • Re: Qry strlen ?, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Qry strlen ?, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: Qry strlen ?, Joe Wright
• Question on Register variables, int main(void)
  • Re: Question on Register variables, Nishu
    • Re: Question on Register variables, pete
      • Re: Question on Register variables, Richard Bos
      • Re: Question on Register variables, Samuel Stearley
      • Re: Question on Register variables, pete
  • Re: Question on Register variables, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Question on Register variables, Richard Tobin
• Shift Operation, Nishu
  • Re: Shift Operation, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Shift Operation, Nishu
      • Re: Shift Operation, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Shift Operation, Nishu
      • Re: Shift Operation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Shift Operation, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Shift Operation, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Shift Operation, Richard Bos
  • Re: Shift Operation, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: Shift Operation, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Shift Operation, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: Shift Operation, Nishu
      • Re: Shift Operation, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: Shift Operation, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Shift Operation, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Shift Operation, Nishu
      • Re: Shift Operation, pete
      • Re: Shift Operation, Nishu
      • Re: Shift Operation, CBFalconer
      • Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham
• DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid
  • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, David Wade
    • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Keith Thompson
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Keith Thompson
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Keith Thompson
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid
      • Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre
• yapay sinir aglari, comen
  • Re: yapay sinir aglari, CBFalconer
  • Re: yapay sinir aglari, Ferruh Yigit
• What is the advantage of C?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Serve Laurijssen
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, David Wade
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, squigs
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Joe Wright
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Neil
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Serve Laurijssen
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Serve Laurijssen
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Joe Wright
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CptDondo
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, David Wade
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Malcolm
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Skarmander
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Charles Richmond
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CptDondo
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Malcolm
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Malcolm
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Charles Richmond
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Charles Richmond
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Malcolm
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, William Hughes
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Skarmander
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, santosh
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, CBFalconer
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Walter Roberson
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble
      • [OT] (was: Re: What is the advantage of C?), Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble
  • Re: What is the advantage of C?, Clever Monkey
• Scoping rules, Chad
  • Re: Scoping rules, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Scoping rules, Chad
      • Re: Scoping rules, Snis Pilbor
    • Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Scoping rules, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Scoping rules, Chad
      • Re: Scoping rules, CBFalconer
      • Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Scoping rules, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Scoping rules, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Scoping rules, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Scoping rules, Chad
      • Re: Scoping rules, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: Scoping rules, Chad
      • Re: Scoping rules, CBFalconer
      • Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin
• Header files question, mdh
  • Re: Header files question, mdh
    • Re: Header files question, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: Header files question, mdh
      • Re: Header files question, CBFalconer
      • Re: Header files question, mdh
      • Re: Header files question, mdh
      • Re: Header files question, CBFalconer
      • Re: Header files question, mdh
      • Re: Header files question, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Header files question, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Header files question, mdh
• Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], novice
  • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], santosh
    • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Keith Thompson
      • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Old Wolf
      • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], jmcgill
      • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Keith Thompson
  • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: Get Pedia, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Get Pedia, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: Get Pedia, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Get Pedia, Al Balmer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Get Pedia, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Get Pedia, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Get Pedia, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Get Pedia, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Get Pedia, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Get Pedia, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Get Pedia, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Get Pedia, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Get Pedia, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Get Pedia, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Get Pedia, Kenny McCormack
• Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
• SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, dfeustel
  • Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, Robert Gamble
    • Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, dfeustel
      • Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, Erik de Castro Lopo
• The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, jacob navia
  • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Rod Pemberton
• p or ~p, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: p or ~p, Devinandan Rao
  • Re: p or ~p, jmcgill
  • Re: p or ~p, Keith Thompson
    • Re: p or ~p, Richard Bos
  • Re: p or ~p, Walter Roberson
    • Re: p or ~p, Simon Biber
  • Re: p or ~p, Rod Pemberton
• parsing a command, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: parsing a command, Cong Wang
    • Re: parsing a command, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: parsing a command, Samuel Stearley
  • Re: parsing a command, Malcolm
  • Re: parsing a command, Spiritus
    • Re: parsing a command, Malcolm
  • Re: parsing a command, mark_bluemel
• C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam
  • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Cong Wang
    • Re: C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam
      • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Cong Wang
  • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Frederick Gotham
    • Re: C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam
      • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Joe Wright
  • Re: C structure reset , not C++, Default User
• Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ark
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, jacob navia
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ian Collins
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, websnarf
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ark
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Bos
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Thad Smith
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ian Collins
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, pete
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, straywithsmile@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Simon Biber
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ark
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ian Collins
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, pete
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Dave Thompson
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Elijah Cardon
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ark
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Chris Torek
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson
• strange behaviour geteuid(), fabio
  • Re: strange behaviour geteuid(), Coos Haak
    • Re: strange behaviour geteuid(), fabio
  • Message not available
    • Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Cong Wang
      • Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], fiocco
      • Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Old Wolf
  • Re: strange behaviour geteuid(), Igmar Palsenberg
• problem reading/writing structures from and to files, arne . muller
  • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, arne . muller
  • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Chris Torek
    • Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Joe Wright
• Re: Invalid lvalue in assignment when trying to advance a void-pointer (struct iovec), Cong Wang
• Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Cong Wang
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, yuhaikuo@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Robert Gamble
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Robert Gamble
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, xdevel
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, xdevel
  • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Fred Kleinschmidt
    • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: Precedence of sizeof, Old Wolf
• Re: List files in current directory, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: List files in current directory, Andrew Poelstra
    • Re: List files in current directory, Simon Biber
• Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?, Lighter
  • Re: Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?, Cong Wang
  • Re: Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?, Simon Biber
  • Re: Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?, Keith Thompson
• writing a string to output, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: writing a string to output, Ian Collins
    • Re: writing a string to output, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: writing a string to output, Cong Wang
  • Re: writing a string to output, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: writing a string to output, Michal Nazarewicz
  • Re: writing a string to output, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: writing a string to output, pete
• Dealing with source code, mistral
  • Re: Dealing with source code, Cong Wang
  • Re: Dealing with source code, jussij
  • Re: Dealing with source code, pete
    • Re: Dealing with source code, mistral
      • Re: Dealing with source code, pete
      • Re: Dealing with source code, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Dealing with source code, jussij
      • Re: Dealing with source code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Dealing with source code, Coos Haak
      • Re: Dealing with source code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Dealing with source code, mistral
• Regarding system function, sunil
  • Re: Regarding system function, Richard Bos
    • Re: Regarding system function, jacob navia
      • Re: Regarding system function, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Regarding system function, jacob navia
      • Re: Regarding system function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Regarding system function, jacob navia
      • Re: Regarding system function, jacob navia
      • Re: Regarding system function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Regarding system function, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Regarding system function, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Regarding system function, Richard Bos
  • Re: Regarding system function, Simon Biber
• Re: tolower and Unicode, Chris Torek
• isdigit, mdh
  • Re: isdigit, Neil
    • Re: isdigit, mdh
  • Re: isdigit, Cong Wang
  • Re: isdigit, Rnags
  • Re: isdigit, shafi
    • Re: isdigit, Keith Thompson
    • Re: isdigit, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: isdigit, pete
      • Re: isdigit, Keith Thompson
      • Re: isdigit, pete
• Best libc implementation, int main(void)
  • Re: Best libc implementation, Ian Collins
  • Re: Best libc implementation, Cong Wang
  • Re: Best libc implementation, raxitsheth2000
    • Re: Best libc implementation, int main(void)
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Ian Collins
    • Re: Best libc implementation, int main(void)
  • Re: Best libc implementation, William Ahern
    • Re: Best libc implementation, Ian Collins
  • Re: Best libc implementation, jmcgill
    • Re: Best libc implementation, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Anders Arnholm
    • Re: Best libc implementation, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: Best libc implementation, Richard Bos
  • Re: Best libc implementation, jaysome
  • Re: Best libc implementation, CBFalconer
• Re: function list, quarkLore
• Casting pointers to functions of different types, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Casting pointers to functions of different types, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Casting pointers to functions of different types, straywithsmile@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Casting pointers to functions of different types, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Casting pointers to functions of different types, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Casting pointers to functions of different types, Dave Thompson
• Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Cong Wang
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Cong Wang
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, straywithsmile@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Jack Klein
  • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, pete
  • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Matt Kowalczyk
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Cong Wang
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, straywithsmile@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, straywithsmile@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Chris Torek
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Cong Wang
  • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Pointers to dead objects, Richard Heathfield
• Contiguous storage of ints?, jmcgill
  • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, jmcgill
  • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, jmcgill
      • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Cong Wang
  • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Contiguous storage of ints?, Frederick Gotham
• Writing Binary Digits to a file, Speed
  • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Artie Gold
    • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Nelu
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Nelu
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Nelu
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Writing Binary Digits to a file, Dave Thompson
• Re: Portable C code, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Portable C code, Elijah Cardon
    • Re: Portable C code, Chris Dollin
• missing a char, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: missing a char, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: missing a char, Elijah Cardon
      • Re: missing a char, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: missing a char, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: missing a char, Lane Straatman
  • Re: missing a char, mark_bluemel
    • Re: missing a char, Lane Straatman
  • Re: missing a char, Default User
• Port Delegation in Socket Programing, pmm
  • Re: Port Delegation in Socket Programing, Walter Roberson
• Problem with string manipulation, aqazi@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Problem with string manipulation, aqazi@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Problem with string manipulation, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Problem with string manipulation, Barry Schwarz
• PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, GUPTAJI
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Zara
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Mabden
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Ian Malone
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Mabden
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Mabden
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Default User
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Tak-Shing Chan
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jacob navia
      • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, jmcgill
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, mark_bluemel
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Zara
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Ingo Menger
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: PASCAL'S TRIANGLE, dcorbit
• Help a practitioner with atomic access, Ark
  • Re: Help a practitioner with atomic access, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Help a practitioner with atomic access, Christopher Layne
  • Re: Help a practitioner with atomic access, Jack Klein
    • Re: Help a practitioner with atomic access, Ark
      • Re: Help a practitioner with atomic access, Chris Torek
• How to change character string in function call?, Wavelet
  • Re: How to change character string in function call?, Wavelet
    • Re: How to change character string in function call?, xdevel
  • Re: How to change character string in function call?, Richard Bos
  • Re: How to change character string in function call?, Fred Kleinschmidt
• why the value is still available, xdevel
  • Re: why the value is still available, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: why the value is still available, Christopher Layne
    • Re: why the value is still available, xdevel
    • Re: why the value is still available, Ark
      • Re: why the value is still available, Christopher Layne
      • Re: why the value is still available, Ark
      • Re: why the value is still available, Christopher Layne
      • Re: why the value is still available, Flash Gordon
      • Re: why the value is still available, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: why the value is still available, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  • Re: why the value is still available, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: why the value is still available, xdevel
• rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2, AJAY SHARMA
  • Re: rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2, Al Balmer
    • Re: rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2, Chris Dollin
• Meschach Matrix Library for Microsoft Visual C, renaysingh
  • Re: Meschach Matrix Library for Microsoft Visual C, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Meschach Matrix Library for Microsoft Visual C, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Meschach Matrix Library for Microsoft Visual C, jacob navia
• Re: accessing char as int through union, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: accessing char as int through union, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
    • Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, CBFalconer
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Christopher Layne
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Christopher Layne
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), websnarf
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as int through union), Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as intthrough union), CBFalconer
      • Re: Hash function for int-aligned text (was: accessing char as intthrough union), CBFalconer
• Re: Implementation of Kahan sum algorithm, Thad Smith
• How to access the stdout file, Andrew
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, Roka
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, Keith Thompson
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, Cong Wang
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, Papastefanos Serafeim
    • Re: How to access the stdout file, Elijah Cardon
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, David Wade
    • Re: How to access the stdout file, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: How to access the stdout file, David Wade
      • Re: How to access the stdout file, Clever Monkey
    • Re: How to access the stdout file, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: How to access the stdout file, Keith Thompson
    • Re: How to access the stdout file, Andrew
  • Re: How to access the stdout file, santosh
• code pages query, kaustubh . deo
  • Re: code pages query, Walter Roberson
    • Re: code pages query, kaustubh . deo
      • Re: code pages query, Chris Dollin
    • Re: code pages query, kaustubh . deo
    • Re: code pages query, kaustubh . deo
• Need help with a unix/c program, preethamkumark
  • Re: Need help with a unix/c program, Ian Collins
    • Re: Need help with a unix/c program, Tom St Denis
      • Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Flash Gordon
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), preethamkumark
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Ian Collins
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Walter Roberson
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Al Balmer
      • Re: Cheating by using Usenet (Was: Re: Need help with a unix/c program), Rod Pemberton
• function reference, Chris Chiasson
  • Re: function reference, Thomas J. Gritzan
  • Re: function reference, Michael
• Re: Do you have the C or C++ standard? (serious question), kwikius
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do you have the C or C++ standard? (serious question), kwikius
    • Re: Do you have the C or C++ standard? (serious question), Chris Hills
    • Re: Do you have the C or C++ standard? (serious question), Michael Wojcik
• character array manipulation - coding style, amer . terzic
  • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Christopher Layne
  • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, T.M. Sommers
  • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Nelu
    • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, amer . terzic
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Christopher Layne
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Michael Mair
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, amer . terzic
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Nelu
      • Re: character array manipulation - coding style, Keith Thompson
• Maddening text sorting problem, pkirk25
  • Re: Maddening text sorting problem, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Maddening text sorting problem, Richard Heathfield
  • Fixed, pkirk25
    • Re: Fixed, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Fixed, Michael Mair
    • Re: Fixed, jmcgill
• Parsing a path name, drhowarddrfine
  • Re: Parsing a path name, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Parsing a path name, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
    • Re: Parsing a path name, drhowarddrfine
    • Re: Parsing a path name, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Parsing a path name, kondal
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Parsing a path name [OT], Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Richard Bos
      • Re: Parsing a path name, drhowarddrfine
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Simon Biber
      • Re: Parsing a path name, drhowarddrfine
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Robert Latest
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Default User
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Default User
      • Re: Parsing a path name, CBFalconer
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Ian Collins
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Ian Collins
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Ian Collins
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Default User
      • Re: Parsing a path name, Paul Connolly
      • Re: Parsing a path name, CBFalconer
• required algorithm for sorting a structure, rushik
  • Re: required algorithm for sorting a structure, Chris Dollin
    • Re: required algorithm for sorting a structure, rushik
  • Re: required algorithm for sorting a structure, jacob navia
    • Re: required algorithm for sorting a structure, Keith Thompson
• C variable Storage, Santy
  • Re: C variable Storage, Christopher Layne
  • Re: C variable Storage, jacob navia
    • Re: C variable Storage, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: C variable Storage, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C variable Storage, Santy
      • Re: C variable Storage, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C variable Storage, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: C variable Storage, Cong Wang
  • Re: C variable Storage, klakkamr
    • Re: C variable Storage, Santy
      • Re: C variable Storage, santosh
      • Re: C variable Storage, quarkLore
      • Re: C variable Storage, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: C variable Storage, Richard Tobin
      • Re: C variable Storage, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: C variable Storage, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: C variable Storage, Richard Bos
  • Re: C variable Storage, Ancient_Hacker
• Re: the difeirent bettwen the function open() with two an three parameters, Richard Bos
  • Re: the difeirent bettwen the function open() with two an three parameters, Keith Thompson
    • Re: the difeirent bettwen the function open() with two an three parameters, Richard Bos
      • Re: the difeirent bettwen the function open() with two an three parameters, Christopher Layne
• Re: behavior of variadic macro, Richard Bos
  • Re: behavior of variadic macro, Laurent Deniau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: behavior of variadic macro, Laurent Deniau
    • Re: behavior of variadic macro, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: behavior of variadic macro, Paul Mensonides
      • Re: behavior of variadic macro, Laurent Deniau
• Re: system() in the absence of a command processor, Richard Bos
  • Re: system() in the absence of a command processor, Harald van Dijk
• About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, mistral
  • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Michael Mair
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Michael Mair
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Roland.Csaszar
  • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Bos
  • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, mistral
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, mistral
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, rjkematick@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Michael Mair
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Friedrich Dominicus
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Keith Thompson
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Friedrich Dominicus
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, John Smith
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, John Smith
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, CBFalconer
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, mistral
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, jacob navia
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Default User
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, mistral
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: About Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition, Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: thanking you, Richard Bos
• some doubts in a .s file of a c program, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, Cong Wang
  • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, jacob navia
    • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: some doubts in a .s file of a c program, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: [OT] some doubts in a .s file of a c program, Stephen Sprunk
• NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: NULL and zeros, Eric Sosman
    • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Walter Roberson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Samuel Stearley
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, mark_bluemel
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Someone
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Clark S. Cox III
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Charles Richmond
      • Re: NULL and zeros, pete
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Flash Gordon
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, pete
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, pete
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Eric Sosman
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Michael Mair
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Michael Mair
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Mabden
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Ian Collins
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Mabden
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Clever Monkey
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, James McGill
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Default User
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Dollin
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Clever Monkey
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Dollin
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Dollin
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Dollin
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Ian Collins
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Charles Richmond
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, jacob navia
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Charles Richmond
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Al Balmer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Ian Collins
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Default User
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Default User
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Clever Monkey
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Tak-Shing Chan
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Bos
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Ian Collins
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Charles Richmond
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Tobin
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Charles Richmond
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Mabden
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, CBFalconer
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Layne
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Torek
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Clark S. Cox III
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Tobin
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: NULL and zeros, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
  • Re: NULL and zeros, Cong Wang
  • Re: NULL and zeros, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: NULL and zeros, William Ahern
  • Re: NULL and zeros, Frederick Gotham
• Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Jordan Abel
  • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., CBFalconer
    • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Christopher Layne
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., CBFalconer
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Richard Bos
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., Charles Richmond
      • Re: scanf(), ungetc() behaviour., pete
• Re: what is atoi( ), Jordan Abel
  • Re: what is atoi( ), pete
• sizeof without parenthesis, Howard Bryce
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Tobin
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Paul Connolly
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Michael Mair
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Keith Thompson
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Walter Roberson
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Jordan Abel
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, T.M. Sommers
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Dave Thompson
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Michael Mair
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Keith Thompson
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Keith Thompson
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, jmcgill
  • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Joe Wright
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Christopher Layne
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, jmcgill
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Christopher Layne
    • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Keith Thompson
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, CBFalconer
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Tobin
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Keith Thompson
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Richard Tobin
      • Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Ancient_Hacker
• eof problems in read double data from a file, akang2005
  • Re: eof problems in read double data from a file, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: eof problems in read double data from a file, jacob navia
    • Re: eof problems in read double data from a file, jacob navia
• %d,%u,%c, iamchiaweilin
  • Re: %d,%u,%c, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: %d,%u,%c, CBFalconer
    • Re: %d,%u,%c, Jordan Abel
  • Re: %d,%u,%c, Walter Roberson
  • Re: %d,%u,%c, Joe Wright
• [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, iamchiaweilin
  • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, pemo
  • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Scott Fluhrer
    • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Scott Fluhrer
  • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: [pointers and arrays]: The difference between an array name and a pointer, Keith Thompson
• Re: C or C++ something else...., kwikius
  • Re: C or C++ something else...., Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C or C++ something else...., kwikius
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., kwikius
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., kwikius
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., Paul Connolly
      • Re: C or C++ something else...., kwikius
• sizeof, chandanlinster
  • Re: sizeof, Cong Wang
  • Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof, T.M. Sommers
      • Re: sizeof, Walter Roberson
      • Re: sizeof, T.M. Sommers
      • Re: sizeof, Walter Roberson
  • Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin
• syntax, John
  • Re: syntax, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: syntax, Cong Wang
  • Re: syntax, rain.man
• Re: Final Theory Of Everything V5.0, Richard Bos
  • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V5.0, John F
    • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V5.0, John F
• Re: Macro Conditional.........., Richard Bos
• Re: to get more knowledge in 'c', Christopher Layne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: to get more knowledge in 'c', jmcgill
    • Re: to get more knowledge in 'c', Richard Heathfield
      • Re: to get more knowledge in 'c', jmcgill
• Re: to fake read() function, those who know me have no need of my name
• Re: [OT] Re: to get more knowledge in 'c', Mabden
• Re: Database Query, Mabden
• Re: standard libraries, those who know me have no need of my name
  • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
    • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: standard libraries, Michael Mair
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: standard libraries, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: standard libraries, Walter Roberson
      • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: standard libraries, Michael Mair
      • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: standard libraries, those who know me have no need of my name
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: standard libraries, CBFalconer
      • Re: standard libraries, Keith Thompson
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: standard libraries, CBFalconer
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
      • Re: standard libraries, Walter Roberson
      • Re: standard libraries, jacob navia
• Learner changing executable to library, pkirk25
  • Re: Learner changing executable to library, pkirk25
  • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Learner changing executable to library, pkirk25
    • Re: Learner changing executable to library, pkirk25
  • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Michael Mair
    • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Michael Mair
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Michael Mair
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Richard Heathfield
  • Size has ballooned, pkirk25
    • Re: Size has ballooned, Richard Heathfield
      • Thanks, pkirk25
  • Re: Learner changing executable to library, Mark McIntyre
• Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
  • Re: Replacing fgets, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Replacing fgets, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Replacing fgets, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
      • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
      • Re: Replacing fgets, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
      • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
      • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
    • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
      • Re: Replacing fgets, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Replacing fgets, Barry Schwarz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Replacing fgets, FireHead
• adding a library (functionality) to an operating system, aghufran
  • Re: adding a library (functionality) to an operating system, Christopher Layne
  • Re: adding a library (functionality) to an operating system, Jack Klein
  • Re: adding a library (functionality) to an operating system, Mark McIntyre
• question about "setjmp()", rover8898
  • Re: question about "setjmp()", Christopher Layne
  • Re: question about "setjmp()", Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: question about "setjmp()", Eric Sosman
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Eric Sosman
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Chris Torek
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Chris Torek
      • Re: question about "setjmp()", Richard Tobin
    • Re: question about "setjmp()", CBFalconer
  • Re: question about "setjmp()", William Hughes
  • Re: question about "setjmp()", Laurent Deniau
  • Re: question about "setjmp()", David Wade
    • Re: question about "setjmp()", rover8898
• convenient C/C++ compiler, polychrom
  • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Mike Wahler
  • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Andrea Laforgia
  • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Michael Mair
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Michael Mair
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, polychrom
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Bos
  • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, pkirk25
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Christopher Layne
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Jordan Abel
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Jordan Abel
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, Walter Roberson
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, mistral
      • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, David Wade
  • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, David Wade
    • Re: convenient C/C++ compiler, mistral
• transformation wisdom, mdh
  • Re: transformation wisdom, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: transformation wisdom, mdh
  • Re: transformation wisdom, Eric Sosman
    • Re: transformation wisdom, mdh
• Re: comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
• Malloc and free questions - learner questions, pkirk25
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Joel Haugen
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Cong Wang
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Andrea Laforgia
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Giorgio Silvestri
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Andrea Laforgia
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, clayne
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, clayne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, clayne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Cong Wang
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, clayne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Cong Wang
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, pkirk25
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, pkirk25
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Malcolm
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Malcolm
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Malcolm
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Malloc and free questions - learner questions, Christopher Layne
• is there any good c interpreter?, yuesefa
  • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Julian V. Noble
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • is there any good c interpreter?, yuesefa
    • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Cong Wang
    • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, clayne
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, backasswards
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Espen Myrland
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, jmcgill
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Espen Myrland
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Christopher Layne
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Michael Mair
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, "Nils O. Selåsdal"
    • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, riedel
    • Re: is there any good c interpreter?, steve
• Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, Mabden
• Re: K&R C and strings, Mabden
• Re: An apology to Mr Paul Hsieh, Mabden
• Re: How can i open a directory, Mabden
• derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, friend.05
  • Re: derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, Michael Mair
    • Re: derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, friend.05
      • Re: derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, pete
      • Re: derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, CBFalconer
  • Re: derefrencing pointer to incomplete type, Cong Wang
• ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Justme
  • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Eric Sosman
    • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Justme
      • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Malcolm
      • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Eric Sosman
      • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, BWIGLEY
  • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, pete
  • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Michal Nazarewicz
    • Re: ow can i use fgets to read and ignore the first two lines of a file and output into another file, Ri