Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:08:12 -0500
jacob navia wrote:
.... snip ...
This is the same as C. C is portable but
system("ls");
will work in Unix and not in windows.
Oh? It works fine here under W98.
[1] c:\c\factsize>ls
a.exe a.out factsize.bak factsize.c factsize.exe factsize.o
[1] c:\c\factsize>lsl
total 260
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dosuser 86866 Sun Oct 08 23:33:16 2006 a.exe
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dosuser 84818 Sun Oct 08 23:33:14 2006 a.out
-rw-r--r-- 1 dosuser 839 Sun Oct 08 23:33:06 2006
factsize.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 dosuser 839 Sun Oct 08 23:34:00 2006
factsize.c
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dosuser 86735 Sat Oct 07 12:17:42 2006
factsize.exe
-rw-r--r-- 1 dosuser 4310 Sun Oct 08 23:26:42 2006
factsize.o
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- References:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: jacob navia
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Triangular Matrix
- Next by Date: Re: Triangular Matrix2
- Previous by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard
- Next by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|