Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:01:52 GMT
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 09:08 -0500, CBFalconer wrote:
jacob navia wrote:
... snip ...
This is the same as C. C is portable but
system("ls");
will work in Unix and not in windows.
Oh? It works fine here under W98.
Not over here under Media Center or Blister RC2.
The chances of someone installing UNIX tools on their system seems
lower than that of them installing cgywin or just plain Linux. And
both of those chances are still pretty low right now.
--
Andrew Poelstra <http://www.wpsoftware.net>
For email, use 'apoelstra' at the above site.
"You're only smart on the outside." -anon.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: james of tucson
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- References:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: jacob navia
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Long Num speed
- Next by Date: Re: const question
- Previous by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard
- Next by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|