Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: james of tucson <jmcgill@[go_ahead_and_spam_me].arizona.edu>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:01:06 -0700
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
The chances of someone installing UNIX tools on their system seems
lower than that of them installing cgywin or just plain Linux. And
both of those chances are still pretty low right now.
Chances? Anybody that wants to is free to run cygwin or linux. That's
the whole point. I don't see where there is any chance involved.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Jordan Abel
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- References:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: jacob navia
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: C / asm / long ints
- Next by Date: Re: Triangular Matrix
- Previous by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- Next by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|