Re: Which C tool?
- From: Neil <NeilKurzm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 05:44:45 GMT
John Bode wrote:
Jack Klein wrote:On a PIC? Not at all.On 31 Oct 2006 19:40:14 -0800, "Michael" <mchlgibs@xxxxxxx> wrote in
comp.lang.c:
I am wiping tears from my eyes from laughing so hard, but I just hadI have a copy of Visual Studio 2005 and Borland Delphi but I'm at aYou may need something specific to your device or PIC. E.g. MicroChip
loss to find where I can start to code C applications, they all give me
options to work in C++ but as I am dealing with embedded systems and
PIC devices I can't use it.
Does anyone know if I can get Visual Studio, I think its better than
Borland, to work with C or failing that what is the best C programing
tool?
has their own C compiler for their PIC line, and there are third party
compilers specific to certain devices as well.
Depending on what you're doing, you may be able to use Visual Studio -
files that end in .c (not .cc or .cpp) are by default compiled as C
code, or you can set file-by-file or project-by-project settings to
compile as C instead of as C++ (under C/C++ Advanced). To write stuff
for an embedded device, you may need to download extensions that
support WinCE, which can be found by googling.
Michael
to respond even though it's way off-topic...
The notion of the incredible resource hogging, bloated POS WinCE
running on a PIC!
Pull the other one.
No one ever said it had to run *well*.
.
- References:
- Which C tool?
- From: john . bradshaw
- Re: Which C tool?
- From: Michael
- Re: Which C tool?
- From: Jack Klein
- Re: Which C tool?
- From: John Bode
- Which C tool?
- Prev by Date: Error: 'for' loop initial declaration used outside c99 mode
- Next by Date: Re: Which C tool?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which C tool?
- Next by thread: Re: Which C tool?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|