Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: Bob Martin <bob.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:12:11 GMT
in 704146 20061103 071302 Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That too. Try running cygwin on a 4341. :-)
The 4341 was a great machine (I was a test engineer on the build line).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- References:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: jacob navia
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: james of tucson
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot return values of char variable
- Next by Date: Re: equivalent of chomp in perl
- Previous by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- Next by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard
- Index(es):
