Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:31:59 +0000
Bob Martin said:
in 704146 20061103 071302 Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That too. Try running cygwin on a 4341. :-)
The 4341 was a great machine (I was a test engineer on the build line).
So I can blame you, then? :-)
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly in future C standard HCF Gerry Wheeler
- From: Walter Banks
- Re: assembly in future C standard HCF Gerry Wheeler
- References:
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: jacob navia
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: james of tucson
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: assembly in future C standard [OT]
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- From: Bob Martin
- Re: assembly in future C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot return values of char variable
- Next by Date: Re: Cannot return values of char variable
- Previous by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard
- Next by thread: Re: assembly in future C standard HCF Gerry Wheeler
- Index(es):