Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:22:19 +0000
stasgold@xxxxxxxxx said:
Thanks for reply.
I give it I try.
Why? It's wrong, broken, wrong, broken, wrong, wrong, wrong! Why would you
use a wrong, broken, wrong, broken, wrong, wrong, wrong suggestion? Even
the guy who suggested it now realises it's wrong, broken, wrong, broken,
wrong, wrong, wrong.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- References:
- scanf behaviour
- From: stasgold
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: stasgold
- scanf behaviour
- Prev by Date: Re: screen clearing in ANSI C
- Next by Date: Re: scanf behaviour
- Previous by thread: Re: scanf behaviour
- Next by thread: Re: scanf behaviour
- Index(es):