Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:43:35 +0000
Ian Collins said:
<snip>
Just curious, has fflush( stdin ) always been undefined, rather than
implementation defined?
Yes.
The Solaris version makes sense to me.
How can flushing input make sense? You flush toilets, not taps.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- References:
- scanf behaviour
- From: stasgold
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: stasgold
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: scanf behaviour
- From: Ian Collins
- scanf behaviour
- Prev by Date: Re: scanf behaviour
- Next by Date: Re: _Complex constant
- Previous by thread: Re: scanf behaviour
- Next by thread: Re: scanf behaviour
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|