Re: On-topicness
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:08:51 GMT
pete <pfiland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Point is though,
that if one wants a definition of what is or is not C,
intent looks as reasonable as anything.
I consider a program which invokes undefined behavior,
to be not a C program,
because the code doesn't mean anything.
Ok, but I'd call it a meaningless C program.
In fact, it can definitely be a "conforming program" as defined by the
standard.
I think the real conclusion is that "Is this a C program?" isn't
always a useful question to ask, much less answer.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
.
- References:
- microsoft visual c++
- From: paz
- Re: microsoft visual c++
- From: Richard Heathfield
- On-topicness (was: microsoft visual c++)
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth
- Re: On-topicness
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: On-topicness
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth
- Re: On-topicness
- From: pete
- microsoft visual c++
- Prev by Date: Re: Random number generation
- Next by Date: Re: String and Character Array...
- Previous by thread: Re: On-topicness
- Next by thread: Re: On-topicness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading