Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:07:53 +0000
Malcolm said:
"Kenny McCormack" <gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
In article <c5GdnTMdI6WHKxjYnZ2dnUVZ8t_inZ2d@xxxxxx>,It's only fun.
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom said:
<snip>
For now I am stuck in MicroSoftville. I realize this is disgusting for
many of the guru's here.
On the contrary, we're generally not interested in your platform. It
doesn't
matter, where C is concerned.
To the OP: You might like to google some of RH's posting history, to see
that he *has* engaged in MS-bashing in the past.
No, it's not only fun. Microsoft have done a lot of harm with their
proprietary, lock-in approach to software, and periodic excoriations are
useful "lest we forget". Of course, if they changed their ways, that would
be different, but how likely is that?
Nevertheless, my point stands. We are *not* interested in the OP's platform.
C is C, no matter where you are.
<snip>
If you go to Richard's site you will see instructions for using Visual
C++. He knows that practically everyone needs a copy of this compiler.
No, I just don't like seeing people floundering around at Step Zero.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
.
- References:
- Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Tom
- Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Bill Reid
- Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Tom
- Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Kenny McCormack
- Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- From: Malcolm
- Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- Prev by Date: memcmp() checker: memory access errors
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- Previous by thread: Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- Next by thread: Re: Dynamic C to C Data Transfer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|