Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: "user923005" <dcorbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2007 15:17:19 -0800
P.S.
This thread is somewhat overly contentious.
Both C. B. Falconer and Paul Hsieh are intelligent and useful
contributors with a long history of helpful posts to all the USENET
groups to which they contribute.
Neither is stupid or lacking knowlege in the area of hash table
creation. I would rank both of them as expert.
If there is to be an argument about the best way to construct a hash
table, I suggest a contest to see which general purpose hash table
performs best in real world situations (short strings, strings of
arbitrary length, integers, long long integers and doubles with a large
class of disparate distributions given as inputs).
If the contest is to be held in news:comp.lang.c then only ANSI C can
be used, but C90 or C99 should both be given equal footing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: websnarf
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- References:
- which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: Julia
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: Lane Straatman
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: websnarf
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- From: user923005
- which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- Prev by Date: Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- Next by Date: Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- Previous by thread: Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- Next by thread: Re: which hash table - chained or open-addressed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|