Re: typedef forward declare

santosh wrote:
krishna wrote:
On Jan 22, 4:09 am, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yevgen Muntyan wrote:

... snip ...

Perhaps. You volunteer to teach them?
Anyway, I am not advocating top-posting, I am saying that CBFalconer
posts are no good. Compare these two:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please don't top-post. Your replies belong following or interspersed
with properly trimmed quotes. See the majority of other posts in the
newsgroup, or:
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
and
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, you appear to be uneducable, since you persist in rude
top-posting. Whether that is innate stupidity or bad manners is
not yet known. You are also persisting in excessive cross-posting,
which is another indication of foolishness. Follow-ups set.
--------------------------------------------------------------------Bear in mind that the second was the result of the OP ignoring the
first. I can allow for ignorance, language difficulties, etc., but
deliberately ignoring correction is another matter. Time for the
club :-)
<snip>
Hi ,
I understand top posting is not acceptable in some communities.Its
perfect in my community..Im coming your way ;) .

That's fine, but it's not fine in this group, and if you want to
participate with maximum benifit and minimum fuss, then it's wise to
respect local conventions.

krishna seems to be trying, and he seems to be saying exactly what
you're saying. Do you actually read what you quote?

Tell me one thing
CBFalconer,is your intention to 'teach' me something,'spread knowledge'
or show superiority of your etiquette??

As far as I can tell, he's just attempting to help newcomers to Usenet
or this group.

So, defending nonsense and insults? What exactly was helpful in the
two CBFalconer's posts in this thread (hint: they are quoted above).

If it is the third one I give a damn to your posts.

Your choice, but don't be upset when many regulars start to ignore you.

Cause everyone here is very clearly here with the
intention of 'learning something new' and not show
superiority.

What's superior in a bunch of helpful links?

Could you try to find those links in CBFalconer replies? Not
in threads elsewhere, but in the C's replies in this thread, the
ones you're defending here.

Knowledge is for free.

No.

It's built on the hard work of countless generations, since the dawn of
human beings.

If not you someone else would teach
me with a gentle smile and much polite words,perhaps you might have not
heard of :).Your posting which use the very polite words
:fool,foolish,innate stupidity ;) express your superior skills is it
;)?This very clearly explains you simple want to show your superiority
or may be some kind of discrimination??Dont know why you are so
persistant about this?

People can get frustrated when repeated attempts to inform and help are
ignored. I agree, that insulting words needn't be used, but that's
human nature.

Yeah, humans get upset when others can't guess that there is willing
to help behind insults.

[snip]
Iam sure he read the reply and simply continued with
his work neglecting your comments because my post serverd his
purpose.

Chuck's post would also serve a useful purpose, if people took the
small amount of time needed to visit some of the links and inform
themselves about good etiquette.

I even did visit a link there, couple of times, got some nice useful
advertisements. Anyway, those links were not in the posts you're
defending here.

[snip]
Iam telling you for
the last time please do not misinterpret kindness as weakness.Iam here
to learn and I am least bothered if you are 'opposite of fool' or not
:) .Thought of ignoring this but could not stop when you used such
words and still insist on following your way :). I donot intend to
pollute the very spirit of this group.If you have any issues with my
posts don't hesitate to mail me.We can take that up in leisure without
interrupting this groups' activities :).Looking forward for your mail.

IMHO, you're making a big fuss over a trivial incident.

He's not actually. Do read the thread to see who makes what.
Or do you mean that krishna should have just said "*** you Chuck"
so there's no point in trying to make up why Chuck's posts were good?
krishna actually kept polite, and replied twice, to two junk
posts Chuck.

I do make big fuss here, I admit. I just hate this conversation:

C: You idiot.
K: Sorry, I am not.
O: C didn't mean anything bad, he just tried to help.
O2: C is good, he helps.
O3: blah blah blah
O4: Exactly, blah blah blah, C is good.
.