Re: malloc vs calloc
- From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:10:22 -0200
CBFalconer escreveu:
Richard wrote:Chuck, are suggesting that a bit of common sense should burn?Ian Collins <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:... snip ...
How many times must people here have to say "do not cast the returnNo they don't. Often people do not read an entire archive for a
value of calloc"? Does anyone read the archive before they post?
problem they did not even realise existed.
I would suggest that if you are tired of pointing out such corrections
then you need to take a break from offering advice. Which would be a
shame as you are normally polite and constructive. There are plenty of
others more than willing to correct the famous malloc cast issue - God
knows they do it enough.
Another valueless foolish post. Into the sin bin you go.
.
- References:
- malloc vs calloc
- From: Raman
- Re: malloc vs calloc
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: malloc vs calloc
- From: Richard
- Re: malloc vs calloc
- From: CBFalconer
- malloc vs calloc
- Prev by Date: Re: How to improve this sort?
- Next by Date: Re: malloc vs calloc
- Previous by thread: Re: malloc vs calloc
- Next by thread: Re: malloc vs calloc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|