Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:38:59 +0000
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:15:17 +1300, in comp.lang.c , Ian Collins
<ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One has to draw the distinction between extensions to the language (the
&& gcc extension and operator overloading) and platform specific
libraries. It is a fairly straightforward exercise for a developer to
implement a set of functions defined in a library
I'm not sure I'd entirely agree with that. It'd be fairly hard to
implement the Win32 libraries on most embedded systems, I suspect.
Unless "implement" includes returining a noop...
Anything which conforms to the language defined in the current C
standard is a C program, which includes programs that include
non-standard headers.
Inasmuch as Geordie is still English. Which is to say not with respect
to passing an exam or making yourself understood in Arizona or
Auchtermuchty.
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- References:
- Automatically generate variables
- From: Nate
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: santosh
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: santosh
- Re: Automatically generate variables
- From: Ian Collins
- Automatically generate variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
- Next by Date: Re: implementor vs standard, was: anti-aliasing
- Previous by thread: Re: Automatically generate variables
- Next by thread: Re: Automatically generate variables
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|