Re: Polyspace Problem

Al Balmer <albalmer@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:22:06 -0800, Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
Yes, but an STL implementation in C would not be part of the C
implementation.

But it would be part of a C++ implementation, wouldn't it? I haven't
actually looked at the standard in a long time, but I thought the STL
was adopted as part of the language. (I don't even remember if the
reserved namespaces are similar.)

<OT>Yes.</OT>

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?)
    ... Al Balmer writes: ... I don't know of anything in standard C ... that could use that feature. ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: how to check the scanf function if it will read more than one number
    ... One, which is easily implementable in standard C, is discarding all the remaining characters in a line. ... - Keith Thompson More details at:. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: sprintf
    ... I am arguing that there has to be a rational explanation for all ... It doesn't matter if C standard ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Boost process and C
    ... Keith Thompson wrote: ... newgroup simply not discuss this issue are part of the problem of ... If there is no clear place where the evolution of C can be ... included in the next C standard. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: An example of MACHO programming and why is wrong
    ... I'd be much more inclined to agree with this if the Standard ... Without the explicit statement (and as the arguments presented by ... implementor could be excused for assuming that the Standard's ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.c)