comp.lang.c

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Computer Training Videos "now online"
  • From: iggy350
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: Confused Newbie
  • From: ilAn
• Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: Restrict qualified pointers in C
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Functions in socket
  • From: Cong Wang
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Richard Harter
• Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: hlubenow
• Dynamic lists of strings in C
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Manuel T
• Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Bill Leary
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Barry
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C ethics question
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• C ethics question
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP)
  • From: albert . neu
• C99 library part of C++ TR1
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
  • From: albert . neu
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: santosh
• Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
  • From: santosh
• Re: Functions in socket
  • From: Ulrich Eckhardt
• Functions in socket
  • From: nick048
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: Restrict qualified pointers in C
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Restrict qualified pointers in C
  • From: Ken Camann
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• height of a BST by iteration - kindly review my solution
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Etymology of "struct"
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: k&r2 exercise 1-13 review
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Martin Golding
• Etymology of "struct"
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: k&r2 exercise 1-13 review
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: user923005
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Use of "." for structure members
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: function length
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: kyle york
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Sending a struct over TCP
  • From: Tor Rustad
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Sending a struct over TCP
  • From: Ian Collins
• Sending a struct over TCP
  • From: Jack
• Re: function length
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Programming algorithms with strings in C++, and transition from C by example!
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: function length
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: how to quit
  • From: user923005
• Re: C++ is complicated and C is bloated.
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: function length
  • From: Tor Rustad
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: function length
  • From: Tor Rustad
• Re: C++ is complicated and C is bloated.
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Martin
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Nelu
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: Bjarne Stroustrup (The Creator of C++): The C++ Programming Language - Third Edition
  • From: Ivar Rosquist
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Default User
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Chris Dollin
• [OT] Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: function length
  • From: Default User
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: function length
  • From: Default User
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Kelly B
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: Use of "." for structure members
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: 王超凡
• Re: Use of "." for structure members
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Use of "." for structure members
  • From: cman
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Nelu
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Army1987
• Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: Spiro Trikaliotis
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Bill Reid
• Re: C preprocessor
  • From: santosh
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Army1987
• Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?
  • From: Steve
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Army1987
• C preprocessor
  • From: mohdalibaig
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Army1987
• pointer to structure array from main.c?
  • From: Steve
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Question on macro
  • From: Army1987
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Barry
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Barry
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: Question on macro
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Question on macro
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: christian.bau
• k&r2 exercise 1-13 review
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Gunvant Patil
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: santosh
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Question on macro
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Manuel T
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• *p++ = tolower(*p));
  • From: Gunvant Patil
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Question on macro
  • From: arunaling
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Marcin
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: santosh
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Doug
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: stefano . verna
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: santosh
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: jaysome
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: jaysome
• Pointer arithmetics in Solaris
  • From: stefano . verna
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: 王超凡
• Re: About Union's question
  • From: jaysome
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• About Union's question
  • From: 王超凡
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: JimS
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: JimS
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: JimS
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Bastie
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Segmentation Fault
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Segmentation Fault
  • From: iwasinnihon
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: function length
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: function length
  • From: koolj96825
• Re: function length
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: user923005
• Re: pointers.
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: (corr) pointers.
  • From: mdh
• Re: (corr) pointers.
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: how to quit
  • From: user923005
• Re: (corr) pointers.
  • From: mdh
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: (corr) pointers.
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: pointers.
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: function length
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• pointers.
  • From: mdh
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: hlubenow
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: function length
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: user923005
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: hstagni
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: function length
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: function length
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: function length
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: function length
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Army1987
• Re: function length
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: ***** charles
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: user923005
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• Sometimes questions arise about C and C++ incompatibilities
  • From: user923005
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• Re: function length
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: function length
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: user923005
• Re: int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• cool!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: aviel570
• List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?
  • From: Spiro Trikaliotis
• int main(void) { return main(); }
  • From: Army1987
• Re: function length
  • From: Default User
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: ***** charles
• Re: function length
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: ***** charles
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: function length
  • From: Michael
• Re: function length
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: doubts on scanf("%100[^\n]%*[^\n]", buff);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: Army1987
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: mark_bluemel
• doubts on scanf("%100[^\n]%*[^\n]", buff);
  • From: lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Army1987
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Reading a key inside a loop
  • From: hstagni
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Bastie
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Bastie
• Re: Windows and Linux
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: function length
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Windows and Linux
  • From: Bastie
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Bill Reid
• Re: function length
  • From: lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?
  • From: llothar
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: PAolo
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: PAolo
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?
  • From: spammenotplui31
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Need help with problem
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: function length
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: function length
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: function length
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Need help with problem
  • From: Scott
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: function length
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Greg Comeau
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Bill
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: function length
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: function length
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Re: A question about sort stable
  • From: santosh
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Chris Dollin
• cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: aviel570
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: function length
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: function length
  • From: gruikmusic
• function length
  • From: koolj96825
• Re: regarding free
  • From: raghu
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Kelly B
• Re: regarding free
  • From: raghu
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• File Handling (Newbie)
  • From: Kelly B
• Re: regarding free
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• regarding free
  • From: raghu
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Bill Pursell
• how to quit
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Macro concatenation
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Macro concatenation
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?
  • From: Stan Milam
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Old Wolf
• A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?
  • From: spammenotplui31
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros
  • From: kenkahn
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Default User
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: user923005
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C
  • From: Tor Rustad
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: pete
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: pete
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Tor Rustad
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Mr John FO Evans
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: kvnsmnsn
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: how to quit
  • From: user923005
• Re: Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• cooll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: aviel570
• cool!!!!!!!!!
  • From: aviel570
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Nelu
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: kvnsmnsn
• Re: Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: ***** charles
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Source navigation
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank
  • From: kvnsmnsn
• Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Accessing enumeration strings in macros
  • From: kenkahn
• Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Tor Rustad
• What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
  • From: albert . neu
• Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int
  • From: duylam76
• Re: socket programming, multiple connections
  • From: PAolo
• Re: socket programming, multiple connections
  • From: Default User
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Source navigation
  • From: PAolo
• Learning C?
  • From: ***** charles
• socket programming, multiple connections
  • From: Jack
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Learning C?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Default User
• Re: how do you pass an array by value - TPA
  • From: Default User
• Re: Creating sequence points using macros
  • From: ais523
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Dave Hansen
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Macro concatenation
  • From: Dave Hansen
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Bill
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Creating sequence points using macros
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Macro concatenation
  • From: K. Jennings
• Re: How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Creating sequence points using macros
  • From: ais523
• How to pass a struct to a function
  • From: Bill
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Confused Newbie
  • From: ilan . pillemer
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Bill Reid
• Re: Macro concatenation
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Confused Newbie
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Macro concatenation
  • From: K. Jennings
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Confused Newbie
  • From: ilan . pillemer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Mark L Pappin
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: representations
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Clement
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Abhi
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: aviel570
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: how to quit
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: Igmar Palsenberg
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Type name from Variable
  • From: jaysome
• Re: representations
  • From: pete
• Type name from Variable
  • From: rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: pete
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: user923005
• Re: how to quit
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to quit
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: file processing in c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: how to quit
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?
  • From: dolphin
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• how to quit
  • From: mynameisthomasanderson
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: file processing in c
  • From: Martin Golding
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Kevin D . Quitt
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Ira Baxter
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Kevin D . Quitt
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Fred Kleinschmidt
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Martin
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: hyperboogie
• [OT] Bush moan (was: Is C faster than fortran?)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: user923005
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Default User
• What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option
  • From: parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Doug
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Doug
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: hyperboogie
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: hyperboogie
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Doug
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Doug
• Re: CUnit Query
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: hyperboogie
• Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Dennis Yurichev
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Problem in Socket Programming
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function
  • From: hyperboogie
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Problem in Socket Programming
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• c code refactoring or optimizing
  • From: Dennis Yurichev
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Problem in Socket Programming
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Problem in Socket Programming
  • From: abhi
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Default User
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Memory Question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Memory Question
  • From: Clement
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Fred Kleinschmidt
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: size of an array without sizeof operator
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: execve system call
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: ramana
• Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: quakewang
• Re: size of an array without sizeof operator
  • From: jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• How to use a const pointer in switch case ?
  • From: quakewang
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: open a *.dat file
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: size of an array without sizeof operator
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Re: open a *.dat file
  • From: daya
• Re: EOF from printf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: open a *.dat file
  • From: angrybaldguy
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Lane Straatman
• open a *.dat file
  • From: Pier
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• EOF from printf
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: size of an array without sizeof operator
  • From: jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Roman Mashak
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Roman Mashak
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: representations
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6
  • From: williamcorrea85
• Re: 'typedef' issue
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Tim Prince
• 'typedef' issue
  • From: Roman Mashak
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: somebody
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: somebody
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?
  • From: user923005
• Re: representations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: user923005
• Re: Please help with newbie error
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Please help with newbie error
  • From: somebody
• Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions
  • From: Giorgos Keramidas
• Re: file processing in c
  • From: Nelu
• Re: file processing in c
  • From: Nelu
• Re: software
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: execve system call
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: CBFalconer
• file processing in c
  • From: wolky
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: representations
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: representations
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: representations
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: software
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: user923005
• software
  • From: wolter
• Re: execve system call
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: [Q]extern in front of function definition?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• [Q]extern in front of function definition?
  • From: djhong
• Re: representations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: representations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: representations
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: representations
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: representations
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: representations
  • From: Fred Kleinschmidt
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: representations
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: representations
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: representations
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: user923005
• Re: execve system call
  • From: Ulrich Eckhardt
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Default User
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Bill Pursell
• execve system call
  • From: neojia@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Nelu
• representations
  • From: Lane Straatman
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: CUnit Query
  • From: gamename
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Automatically generate file names
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Automatically generate file names
  • From: Freddy
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Chris Torek
• 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: coder
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: performance question related to BST traversal
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Lauri Alanko
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Mr John FO Evans
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Army1987
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Army1987
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• About the -rdynamic flag
  • From: parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: ramana
• Is C faster than fortran?
  • From: Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: ramana
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Iwo Mergler
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Army1987
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: const non-pointer function parameters
  • From: Army1987
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: pete
• Re: const non-pointer function parameters
  • From: pete
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: pete
• Re: const non-pointer function parameters
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: Army1987
• Re: [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Army1987
• Re: const non-pointer function parameters
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• const non-pointer function parameters
  • From: lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Vallabha
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Chris Dollin
• performance question related to BST traversal
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?
  • From: mr . hong
• Re: Huffman Algorithm
  • From: Vallabha
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: Ian Collins
• sizeof dataTypes at run time
  • From: Raman
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: question about k&r2
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: cheesiong@xxxxxxxxx
• question about k&r2
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: [OT] Huffman Algorithm
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [OT] Huffman Algorithm
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Huffman Algorithm
  • From: Udhay
• Re: INT_MIN and compiler diagnostic
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Man pages and standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: explain the result
  • From: pete
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: pete
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Ugly Type Conversion
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: CUnit Query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Army1987
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Army1987
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: CUnit Query
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: CUnit Query
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Army1987
• CUnit Query
  • From: gamename
• Blocks and Their Use
  • From: Martin
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Copying Structures
  • From: Ulrich Eckhardt
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Copying Structures
  • From: Mr John FO Evans
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Army1987
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: explain the result
  • From: pete
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: santosh
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: santosh
• Re: explain the result
  • From: pete
• How to Return an array of strings in C (char**)
  • From: vignesh4u
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: pete
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: explain the result
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: pete
• explain the result
  • From: param
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: pete
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Army1987
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: pete
• Re: Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: pete
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Carnage
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Carramba
• Re: reading file
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Discarding unread data after scanf()
  • From: Army1987
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: pointer type casting
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Shapalov
• pointer type casting
  • From: cheesiong@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: stdarg definitions
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Various C standards/documents (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: pete
• Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...))
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: pete
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: websnarf
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Barry
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Meaning of "region" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Man pages and standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: fseek()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating stringrepresents integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: CBFalconer
• Various C standards/documents (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Barry
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: reading file
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Meaning of "region" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: CookBook/Matrix errata (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• using strcpy to copy from a char
  • From: Alok Kumar
• Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Doug
• CookBook/Matrix errata (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: pete
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: pete
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: pete
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Problems with basics..
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: pete
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: pete
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: pete
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: pete
• Re: strdup
  • From: pete
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: pete
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: almost understood
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Ugly Type Conversion
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: pete
• Re: Problems with basics..
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: pete
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: santosh
• Problems with basics..
  • From: iCoder
• Re: almost understood
  • From: santosh
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: pete
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: Homuncilus
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: almost understood
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• cont char* p , is allowing values to change
  • From: parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• [OT] Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: pete
• how do you pass an array by value
  • From: Abhi
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• (OT) Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Barry
• Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Carramba
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Erdinç
• Re: Validity/Invalidity of the code
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Ugly Type Conversion
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Carramba
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Bill Pursell
• primes with Child's Binomial Theorem
  • From: Carramba
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Carramba
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Doug
• almost understood
  • From: ericunfuk
• Ugly Type Conversion
  • From: Lionel Zhou
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Validity/Invalidity of the code
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Compile Time Error ... arghh
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: strdup
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Mark F. Haigh
• Re: print binary representation
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: ehabaziz2001
• print binary representation
  • From: Carramba
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Mark F. Haigh
• Re: strdup
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Mark F. Haigh
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: user923005
• Re: fseek()
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Trap Int21h problem
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Trap Int21h problem
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Carnage
• Re: Trap Int21h problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: fseek()
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Carnage
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: fseek()
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Trap Int21h problem
  • From: gerotica
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Trap Int21h problem
  • From: gerotica
• Re: reading file
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• feof(), fseek(), fread()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: reading file
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: reading file
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Richard Tobin
• reading file
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: fseek()
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• fseek()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: fseek()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Doug
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Uses of offsetof?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: fseek()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: user923005
• Cross platform lib in 'C'
  • From: Carnage
• Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends
  • From: Francine . Neary
• fseek()
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: wumei2010
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: strdup
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: Flash Gordon
• fseek() clears EOF?
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: user923005
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: user923005
• unexpected character displayed infront of the variable
  • From: ehabaziz2001
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: How to load the whole file?
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Default User
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: Robert Gamble
• How to load the whole file?
  • From: Finger . Octopus
• newbie question: whats wrong with my code?
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: daya
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: daya
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: daya
• Re: dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• dependency of sizeof operator
  • From: vandana
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Memory leak
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: read and write binary file
  • From: Ulrich Eckhardt
• Re: Memory leak
  • From: Clever Monkey
• read and write binary file
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: Memory leak
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Memory leak
  • From: antani
• Re: Testing for a type
  • From: bytebro
• Re: preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Testing for a type
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: strdup
  • From: ais523
• Re: preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: .rhavin grobert
• Testing for a type
  • From: bytebro
• Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C
  • From: Pietro Cerutti
• Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C
  • From: bytebro
• Re: printf question
  • From: Haider
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C
  • From: Dave Cullen
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Mark F. Haigh
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Raw disk access
  • From: Ian Collins
• Raw disk access
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: printf question
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: strdup
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: fseek() newbie question
  • From: websnarf
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: fseek() newbie question
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Bos
• K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Debugging core in different environment
  • From: Ian Collins
• Debugging core in different environment
  • From: sunil
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: printf question
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Old Wolf
• fseek() newbie question
  • From: ericunfuk
• Re: Compilier problem
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• PHP Development Resources Directory
  • From: HotFreePHP.Com
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: pete
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• printf question
  • From: Jamesm
• Re: cos function
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: Compilier problem
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: printf question
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: printf question
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf question
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: printf question
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Compilier problem
  • From: Ulrich Eckhardt
• Re: Compilier problem
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Compilier problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• Compilier problem
  • From: skasetty
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: pete
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: pete
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e) - TPA
  • From: Default User
• Re: preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: Walter Roberson
• preprocessor: macros in a string...
  • From: .rhavin grobert
• Re: strdup
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: strdup
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ivar Rosquist
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: cos function
  • From: user923005
• Re: cos function
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: user923005
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ? - TPA
  • From: Default User
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Default User
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e) - TPA
  • From: Default User
• Re: static
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: static
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: static
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: static
  • From: vim
• Re: static
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Aliasing in assignment
  • From: Lauri Alanko
• Re: strdup
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• static
  • From: vim
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Racaille
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: cos function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: bytebro
• Re: strdup
  • From: P.J. Plauger
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strdup
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: cos function
  • From: polas
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: cos function
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: cos function
  • From: polas
• Re: cos function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: cos function
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Seeking getoptlong()
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: strdup
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• cos function
  • From: polas
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: strdup
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Seeking getoptlong()
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strdup
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2
  • From: arnuld
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Daniel Rudy
• Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: pavi
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: Error related to Structure or Union
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Error related to Structure or Union
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Error related to Structure or Union
  • From: the_init
• Seeking getoptlong()
  • From: Baron Samedi
• Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: Ian Collins
• Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out
  • From: pavi
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: cman
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Bos
• modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++)
  • From: artifact . one
• Re: Poll Loop (Asynchronous IO)
  • From: Ian Collins
• Poll Loop (Asynchronous IO)
  • From: chsalvia
• Re: good hard copy c reference
  • From: Ian Collins
• good hard copy c reference
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: arnuld
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: strdup
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: redraw shaking problem !
  • From: black(flashing vampire)
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Puzzle about multi definitions
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: strdup
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: user923005
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strdup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: user923005
• Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++)
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: strdup
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: strdup
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strdup
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: strdup
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: strdup
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: gio
• Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Army1987
• Re: strdup
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Army1987
• Re: C rulez
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C rulez
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: user923005
• Re: strdup
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• strdup
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C rulez
  • From: pete
• Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls
  • From: pete
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• this is perfect !
  • From: inurasalangova@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Army1987
• delirious program, episode II
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Guillaume
• Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• About Memory Allocation and function calls
  • From: william
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++)
  • From: lishengs
• Sorta-OT: John Backus obit
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: llothar
• Re: Logging library
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Accessing web with a C program
  • From: Neo
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: llothar
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Accessing web with a C program
  • From: Neo
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: llothar
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Racaille
• Re: Logging library
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: gio
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Trouble with formats in printf
  • From: Sanjay Kulkarni
• "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e)
  • From: pandit
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: gio
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Ian Malone
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: sololoquist
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: arnuld
• Memset is faster than simple loop?
  • From: AndersWang
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: llothar
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: system() function and current working directory
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program
  • From: jyck91
• system() function and current working directory
  • From: gio
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: blufox
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Logging library
  • From: sug
• Re: redraw shaking problem !
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Ivar Rosquist
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: arnuld
• Re: redraw shaking problem !
  • From: black(flashing vampire)
• Re: redraw shaking problem !
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: p_cricket_guy
• Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• redraw shaking problem !
  • From: black(flashing vampire)
• Re: What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• What is "typedef struct" ?
  • From: cman
• Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: Gawain
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: user923005
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8
  • From: user923005
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Quine
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: user923005
• Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
  • From: ajba74
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Infinite loop [OT]
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: user923005
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: user923005
• Re: Infinite loop [OT]
  • From: user923005
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: user923005
• Re: Anyone can explain the meaning of following info
  • From: user923005
• Re: C rulez
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: pete
• Anyone can explain the meaning of following info
  • From: pupopg
• Re: Puzzle about multi definitions
  • From: user923005
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Puzzle about multi definitions
  • From: erichain
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: zavnobih
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: user923005
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: zavnobih
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: user923005
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: user923005
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: zavnobih
• Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort
  • From: zavnobih
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: pete
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Quine
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: CookBook/Matrix document
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• 2 C || ~ 2 C
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Debugging from AIX server
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Quine
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Debugging from AIX server
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Debugging from AIX server
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Debugging from AIX server
  • From: gopal
• Re: Quine
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: [OT] Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: [OT] Spot the error...
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: how to become advance c programmer
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Quine
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: [OT] Spot the error...
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C rulez
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: C rulez
  • From: user923005
• Re: Quine
  • From: jxh
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Joe Wright
• C rulez
  • From: klaushuotari
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: william
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Quine
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Quine
  • From: jxh
• CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Quine
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: user923005
• Re: Hello
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8
  • From: user923005
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Nitpicking bad jargon such as "lvalue" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: user923005
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: arnuld
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Hello
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: stdarg definitions
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Job Opportunity
  • From: Rameet
• Re: stdarg definitions
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• stdarg definitions
  • From: cman
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: Quine
  • From: ais523
• Re: help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: jyck91
• Re: K&R2 1.5.4 example programme does not work
  • From: arnuld
• K&R2 1.5.4 example programme does not work
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Quine
  • From: pasalic . zaharije
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Quine
  • From: singlepoint
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10
  • From: arnuld
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: NwsGrp1
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: NwsGrp1
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Bavo
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Spot the error...
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Spot the error...
  • From: NwsGrp1
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• CookBook/Matrix document (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• From vasanth
  • From: vasanthvn
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Nitpicking bad jargon such as "lvalue" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer)
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX
  • From: artifact . one
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: monitoring function call in debug logs
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: monitoring function call in debug logs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX
  • From: artifact . one
• monitoring function call in debug logs
  • From: royi . scalemp
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Memory Alignment Problem
  • From: iduniq
• Re: multiple function definitions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Old Wolf
• Number of characters required for FLT_MAX
  • From: artifact . one
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: arnuld
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: felix
• BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently
  • From: william
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: herning
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: Racaille
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: multiple function definitions
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: multiple function definitions
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Anthony Irwin
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Jack Klein
• ascii pwned by reckless C
  • From: herning
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Infinite loop [OT]
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: Help me with a class assignment
  • From: user923005
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: pete
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Old Wolf
• Help me with a class assignment
  • From: jjmillertime
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal - GAL
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Chris Johnson
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Norm Mann
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: user923005
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: muntyan
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: pete
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal - TPA
  • From: Default User
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: abhishekkarnik
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Tobias Rischer
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: "Fork" in Windows
  • From: Tobias Rischer
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: abhishekkarnik
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Tobias Rischer
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal
  • From: Tobias Rischer
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: llothar
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: alij
• Re: Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Char pointer - How to give value?
  • From: alij
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: little games
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: gamename
• Re: help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: network programming in C
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: william
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: william
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: william
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: qsort descending order
  • From: Richard Tobin
• How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?
  • From: william
• Re: "Fork" in Windows
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: william
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: william
• Re: qsort descending order
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Hello
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: multiple function definitions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: David Mathog
• help me to write a base conversion program
  • From: jyck91
• Re: multiple function definitions
  • From: Fred Kleinschmidt
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: multiple global variable definitions
  • From: Fred Kleinschmidt
• Re: qsort descending order
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• multiple function definitions
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• multiple global variable definitions
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: coder
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: ais523
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: source code
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: pete
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Eric Sosman
• POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: coder
• Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Kentor
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Doug
• Re: source code
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Army1987
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: [OT] Infinite loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: char array initialization
  • From: FlorinBr
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: "Fork" in Windows
  • From: Ian Collins
• "Fork" in Windows
  • From: anders
• Re: source code
  • From: llothar
• Re: qsort descending order
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• qsort descending order
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: muntyan
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: pete
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: pete
• Re: source code
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• executing shell commands from c?
  • From: Kentor
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Steve Thompson
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: source code
  • From: napi
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: source code
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Steve Thompson
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: muntyan
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: pete
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Help me
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: void * vs char *
  • From: pete
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• void * vs char *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: pete
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Norm Mann
• Re: Inconsistent Program Results
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: editor, is C obsolete?, and thank you
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: muntyan
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Old Wolf
• source code
  • From: zorba
• Re: char array initialization
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: questions on ftell and fopen
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Mark L Pappin
• Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Steve Thompson
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: how to become advance c programmer
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Chris Johnson
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Army1987
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Army1987
• char array initialization
  • From: FlorinBr
• Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system
  • From: Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Default User
• Little problem with a delirant program
  • From: Army1987
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Default User
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: gamename
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: gamename
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: pete
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: pete
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: pete
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: what will be the value of #define
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: llothar
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: llothar
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: jaysome
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Default User
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: what will be the value of #define
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: llothar
• Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: pete
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Default User
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: dmoran21@xxxxxxx
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Zach
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Zach
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: pete
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: santosh
• Re: Infinite loop
  • From: dmoran21@xxxxxxx
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: pete
• Infinite loop
  • From: dmoran21@xxxxxxx
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: pete
• Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: muntyan
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: C Strings
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: How the stack grows
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: INT_MIN and compiler diagnostic
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: what will be the value of #define
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: where does the value returned by main go ?
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: goose
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Default User
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: strtok
  • From: Zack
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: where does the value returned by main go ?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: functions' pointer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: anilnf
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: santosh
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: santosh
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: santosh
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: santosh
• Re: ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: santosh
• ANSI -> K&R ?
  • From: llothar
• Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: santosh
• functions' pointer
  • From: gio
• Re: K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• K&R -> ANSI?
  • From: Zach
• How to set a double pointer as input argument
  • From: Plissken.s@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: william
• confusion when comparing char * with a string literal
  • From: william
• Re: undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Gregor H .
• undefined and unspecified behavior
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: From vasanth
  • From: Eric Sosman
• From vasanth
  • From: vasanthvn
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5
  • From: Jason Curl
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Jason Curl
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Jason Curl
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Jason Curl
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}
  • From: user923005
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: user923005
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: jaysome
• Re: What is "\r" represent?
  • From: jaysome
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: user923005
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5
  • From: user923005
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4
  • From: arnuld
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: user923005
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: strtok
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: strtok
  • From: Zack
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Convert GMT to Local Time
  • From: ZR
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: explicit casts
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Convert GMT to Local Time
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• explicit casts
  • From: rCs
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Richard Harter
• Convert GMT to Local Time
  • From: ZR
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string
  • From: Default User
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: What is "\r" represent?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Ian Collins
• Symbolic computation with the language c : The Derivative step by step.
  • From: xhunga
• Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Unit Testing With Function Mocking
  • From: gamename
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Default User
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: y++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: brent . buescher
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• HELP Please - Convert binary number to string
  • From: Todd_Goselin
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: user923005
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: y++
  • From: Mike Wahler
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: matevzb
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: What is "\r" represent?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: enums & ints
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• enums & ints
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: santosh
• Re: What is "\r" represent?
  • From: santosh
• Re: What is "\r" represent?
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Default User
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: user923005
• What is "\r" represent?
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: Michael
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: bert
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: VijaKhara
• how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: K&R 5-1
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: K&R 5-1
  • From: Gregor H .
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Klarth
• Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Mike
• Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: y++
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Simple but interesting issue
  • From: Mike
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: y++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Memory Alignment Problem
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: ziibrs
• Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: micans
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: write a c programme
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: y++
  • From: Richard Bos
• data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor
  • From: junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc
  • From: ziibrs
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Chris Dollin
• char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc
  • From: ziibrs
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: y++
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Vallabha
• Re: assig array != struct ?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: what's diffs in the prog?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: felix
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Nishu
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Multiple returns in functions
  • From: Ian Collins
• Multiple returns in functions
  • From: nergal
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Memory Alignment Problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: assembly in c
  • From: user923005
• Re: y++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: associativity of operators
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• assembly in c
  • From: ghost.rider.zero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: masood
• associativity of operators
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: assig array != struct ?
  • From: langog . info
• Re: assig array != struct ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• what's diffs in the prog?
  • From: guoliang
• assig array != struct ?
  • From: langog . info
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: tehn . yit . chin
• Re: f() + g() * h()
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• doubt regarding return value of a function
  • From: felix
• Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• f() + g() * h()
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• y++
  • From: ARMAS
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: tehn . yit . chin
• Memory Alignment Problem
  • From: iduniq
• Re: strtok
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: strtok
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: brent . buescher
• Re: strtok
  • From: Zack
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: pete
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: Serpent
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: brent . buescher
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays
  • From: Serpent
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: strtok
  • From: pete
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: pete
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: pete
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: David Wade
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: pete
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: pete
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: floating-point precision
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: bluejack
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: [meta] OT-vs-T (was Re: Real Life Unions)
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: user923005
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Shared Library Question
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: matevzb
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: basics of c language
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• basics of c language
  • From: masood
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Shared Library Question
  • From: maven22
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Shared Library Question
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: llothar
• cool!!!!!!
  • From: aviel571
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: John Bode
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Racaille
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: generate call graph for C on windows-xp
  • From: Bernard
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: Chris Dollin
• dynamic 2 D array with malloc??
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: MSVC type cast warning
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Racaille
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: C In Your Brain Quick answer
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• MSVC type cast warning
  • From: llothar
• Re: c lan
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• [meta] OT-vs-T (was Re: Real Life Unions)
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Dietmar Schindler
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Shared Library Question
  • From: maven22
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Racaille
• Re: generate call graph for C on windows-xp
  • From: Ivan Vecerina
• Re: regarding #define
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: File pointer problem
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• File pointer problem
  • From: nergal
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: strtok
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Computer Job Vacancy
  • From: sumberbisnis
• Re: C GUIs
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• generate call graph for C on windows-xp
  • From: Bernard
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• C GUIs
  • From: bagz
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?
  • From: websnarf
• Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Are static functions better optimized by compilers?
  • From: llothar
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: regarding #define
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Re: regarding #define
  • From: Sheth Raxit
• Re: Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work
  • From: goose
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: goose
• Re: regarding #define
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• regarding #define
  • From: venkat
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• cable internet inquiry
  • From: jassica
• web designing solution
  • From: jassica
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strtok
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• strtok
  • From: Zack
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: 浩澄
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Robert Gamble
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Unions Redux
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: softwindow
• Re: write a c programme
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Farmer
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: C In Your Brain Quick answer
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ???????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Allah
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Mark Babli
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Aliasing rules - int and long
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Unions Redux
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Function call with wrong number of parameters
  • From: arne
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: c lan
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Dave Vandervies
• Re: Allah
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Correct way to cast
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Correct way to cast
  • From: Joe
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: dave. null
• Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?
  • From: Mark Babli
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: ANDing char and int data items
  • From: Joe
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: santosh
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: R Pradeep Chandran
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: ANDing char and int data items
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• C89, size_t, and long
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• printf("%d", INT_MAX);
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: bluejack
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: richard . wm . jones
• C In Your Brain Quick answer
  • From: oorga . power
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Clark Cox
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: ANDing char and int data items
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: ANDing char and int data items
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Rahul
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: John Bode
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: santosh
• Re: c lan
  • From: Chris Dollin
• ANDing char and int data items
  • From: Rahul
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Chris Dollin
• c lan
  • From: amazing
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Cong Wang
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Cong Wang
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Bryan
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• modifying the strings pointed to by argv
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: type of argc
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Why the address of array equals array.
  • From: 浩澄
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Florian Weingarten
• What is C suitable for nowadays?
  • From: Matthew Zhou
• type of argc
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char
  • From: Florian Weingarten
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: variable after label
  • From: santosh
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: Tweedale
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Hills
• char vs. signed or unsigned char
  • From: At_sea_with_C
• Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: richard . wm . jones
• Re: strchr declaration
  • From: Florian Weingarten
• Re: strchr declaration
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Richard
• Re: variable after label
  • From: Chris Dollin
• strchr declaration
  • From: ts
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: variable after label
  • From: cmk128
• Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: Keith Thompson
• variable after label
  • From: cmk128
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: pete
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: pete
• Re: char a[0] ;
  • From: santosh
• Re: Accessing web with a C program
  • From: santosh
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: Allah
  • From: Farmer
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Dietmar Schindler
• Re: Allah
  • From: Happy Man
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: santosh
• Re: how to become advance c programmer
  • From: santosh
• Re: Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to become advance c programmer
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: santosh
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: sort the array of struct based on the data members ??
  • From: santosh
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: santosh
• Re: swapping pointers returned by malloc
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: sort the array of struct based on the data members ??
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Ian Collins
• swapping pointers returned by malloc
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: Rahul
• sort the array of struct based on the data members ??
  • From: Santosh Nayak
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Rahul
• Re: C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: Bill Pursell
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: Allah
  • From: Farmer
• C99 standard anybody has?
  • From: Rahul
• Re: Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: Farmer
• Re: Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Jack Klein
• Bitwise shift help please?
  • From: knservis
• Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work
  • From: majdaz
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: #define vs const declaration
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: William Hughes
• union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: char a[0] ;
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: pete
• Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive
  • From: Default User
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Default User
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: pete
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: pete
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Allah
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Accessing web with a C program
  • From: Neo
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Truth Seeker
  • From: SM Ryan
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: santosh
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive
  • From: santosh
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: santosh
• what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive
  • From: parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: santosh
• Allah
  • From: Happy Man
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: When to use alternative argument layout?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Truth Seeker
  • From: Happy Man
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: user923005
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: Default User
• Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: p_cricket_guy
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: When to use alternative argument layout?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: When to use alternative argument layout?
  • From: Al Balmer
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: bluejack
• Re: operations with double integers
  • From: santosh
• Re: When to use alternative argument layout?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: Zhou Yan
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: santosh
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Flash Gordon
• operations with double integers
  • From: Alexander Stoyakin
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Walter Roberson
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: santosh
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: When to use alternative argument layout?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: Papastefanos Serafeim
• Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: santosh
• Re: char a[0] ;
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: char a[0] ;
  • From: santosh
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: bytebro
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: santosh
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze"
  • From: arnuld
• char a[0] ;
  • From: Harold Weissman
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: santosh
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Flash Gordon
• how to surround a constant with quotes?
  • From: .rhavin grobert
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: santosh
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: santosh
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl
  • From: richard . wm . jones
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: santosh
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: Chris Dollin
• K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise)
  • From: arnuld
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: arnuld
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Chris Torek
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: Chris Torek
• UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• [still OT] Re: Truth Seeker
  • From: goose
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: santosh
• Why is C compiler stubborn ?
  • From: alertjean
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: TefJlives
• Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: Ian Collins
• K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: Andrew Poelstra
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Can someone please tell me where I am going wrong??
  • From: pete
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: pete
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• Re: ANSI English :-) syntax ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: ANSI English :-) syntax ?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: mensanator@xxxxxxx
• Re: Good refresher site
  • From: bluejack
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Miojo Lamen
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Good refresher site
  • From: gjrw68
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: websnarf
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Allocating large blocks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds
  • From: Spitfire
• Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds
  • From: Spitfire
• Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds
  • From: Spitfire
• Re: Truth Seeker
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: pete
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Roland Pibinger
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: NOP pointer
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Al Balmer
• NOP pointer
  • From: TefJlives
• Re: Allocating large blocks
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: user923005
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: user923005
• Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB
  • From: william
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: user923005
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Francine . Neary
• Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB
  • From: santosh
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: David Tiktin
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: santosh
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB
  • From: william
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: uidzer0
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: santosh
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: uidzer0
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: user923005
• Re: Proper fgets
  • From: user923005
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Adrian Hawryluk
• JavaScript Popup Windows Generation and Testing Tutorials
  • From: Software Engineer
• Proper fgets
  • From: uidzer0
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Looking for C code for SVD
  • From: user923005
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: mark_bluemel
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: santosh
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Practical uses of XOR
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Amali
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Practical uses of XOR
  • From: cman
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: santosh
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: micans
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Amali
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: micans
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Amali
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: micans
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: micans
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Violation of Conversion rule of C99.
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: a simple query
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Capture USB Webcam Images using C
  • From: santosh
• Re: Truth Seeker
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Rajesh S R
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Capture USB Webcam Images using C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Capture USB Webcam Images using C
  • From: Speed
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: K&R2 exercise 1.17 solution
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: santosh
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: santosh
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: santosh
• Re: Who are Darwin's Outcasts?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: size of pointers
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Please help me to catch this error
  • From: Amali
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• size of pointers
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: Who are Darwin's Outcasts?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: c compilation
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: a simple query
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Nelu
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Nelu
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: bluejack
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: filehellomarch
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: santosh
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Nelu
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: bluejack
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Ernie Wright
• Re: please do this for me
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: please do this for me
  • From: Christopher Benson-Manica
• Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• beginner's question on pointer arithmetic
  • From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Looking for C code for SVD
  • From: Nelu
• Looking for C code for SVD
  • From: A.E lover
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: santosh
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Can someone please tell me where I am going wrong??
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Real Life Unions
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: bluejack
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Good Design in C: Encapsulation
  • From: bluejack
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: integer multiplication
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Rvalue of struct type
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: C Strings
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: incrementing void *
  • From: pete
• Re: end of array
  • From: pete
• Re: double vs float
  • From: pete
• Re: question on qsort library function
  • From: pete
• Re: Allocating large blocks
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: using strtok
  • From: pete
• Re: Generate two random number and multiply
  • From: pete
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can someone please tell me where I am going wrong??
  • From: pete
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: Beej Jorgensen
• Re: enum question.
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: using strtok
  • From: Servé Laurijssen
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• OT - Re: beginning algorithms
  • From: santosh
• Re: using strtok
  • From: matevzb
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet
  • From: santosh
• Re: Compound Literals
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: enum question.
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Casting of void pointer returned by malloc()
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Casting of void pointer returned by malloc()
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Is using splint a waste of time ?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Please Need someone's help
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: beginning algorithms
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Please Need someone's help
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: beginning algorithms
  • From: santosh
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array"
  • From: santosh
• Re: ANSI C syntax ?
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: any views on this algorithms book
  • From: arnuld
• Re: any views on this algorith