Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:25 -0500
Al Balmer wrote:
Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx> wrote:.... snip ...
Based on what I've seen in this thread, exactly one American has
taken unreasonable offense at the term "USAnian" being used in
passing in a technical discussion, in a context that carried no
hint of any political agenda beyond what might be inferred from
the use of the word itself. As far as I could see, the use of
"USAnian" did *not* imply that the writer felt that the word
"American" is incorrect. It struck me as slightly silly and
utterly inoffensive. Incidentally, the term has been used a number
of times in this newsgroup before, without starting flame wars.
It always struck me as a silly attempt to be mildly offensive. The
silliness outweighs the offensiveness.
I consider it a gentle means of avoiding offending non-USAnians.
This is taking a positive view of it. As I see it now there is one
person objecting, and quite a few with somewhat gentler objections
to the use of American for the purpose.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- ANSI C syntax ?
- From: bz800k
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Zhou
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Zhou Yan
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Default User
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Default User
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Default User
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- From: Al Balmer
- ANSI C syntax ?
- Prev by Date: Re: incrementing void *
- Next by Date: Re: integer multiplication
- Previous by thread: Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- Next by thread: Re: ANSI C syntax ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading