Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: "santosh" <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2007 01:06:33 -0700
Richard Heathfield wrote:
santosh said:
user923005 wrote:
<snip>
P.S.
Google (so far as I know) lacks any ability to set followups, [ ... ]
Actually it does, as this post illustrates.
You actually proved not that it does, but that it doesn't.
I think I actually proved that I didn't think before posting. :-)
Anyway my point stands.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- References:
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: santosh
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by Date: Re: Learning C?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|