Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:16:42 +0100
Richard Heathfield wrote, On 31/03/07 09:02:
santosh said:
user923005 wrote:
<snip>
P.S.Actually it does, as this post illustrates.
Google (so far as I know) lacks any ability to set followups, [ ... ]
You actually proved not that it does, but that it doesn't.
Check the headers of Santosh's message. He added a follow-up to comp.lang.c. No visible effect because it was posted here, but it proves the point.
--
Flash Gordon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- References:
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: santosh
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Prev by Date: Re: Learning C?
- Next by Date: Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|