Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: albert.neu@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Mar 2007 02:13:54 -0700
Hello!
What is the difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language
parts" of C99.
see
http://groups.google.at/group/microsoft.public.vc.language/browse_thread/thread/e9a67f0ff20a954b/bd2bada2bbdbce56?lnk=st&rnum=1#bd2bada2bbdbce56
I know that "Dinkum Compleat Libraries" (http://www.dinkumware.com/)
support the "library parts" of C99 - this probably relates to the C99
library headers and the functionality they provide.?
Are the "language parts" of C99 perhaps things like "variable
declarations" in the middle of {}-blocks? See below...
/******** test.c *********/
#include <stdio.h>
int main( void )
{
printf("hello world\n");
char c = 5; //variable declaration
return 0;
}
What else might be included in the "language parts" of C99?
Thanks,
Albert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: P.J. Plauger
- Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Prev by Date: Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??
- Next by Date: Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Previous by thread: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by thread: Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|