Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:38:00 +0000
Flash Gordon said:
Richard Heathfield wrote, On 31/03/07 09:02:
santosh said:
user923005 wrote:
<snip>
P.S.Actually it does, as this post illustrates.
Google (so far as I know) lacks any ability to set followups, [ ...
]
You actually proved not that it does, but that it doesn't.
Check the headers of Santosh's message. He added a follow-up to
comp.lang.c. No visible effect because it was posted here, but it
proves the point.
Read it again, starting with user923005's article. You may find that
reading it aloud will help you get the point more easily.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- References:
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: santosh
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Flash Gordon
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Prev by Date: Re: Learning C?
- Next by Date: C99 library part of C++ TR1
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|