Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:59:58 +0100
santosh wrote, On 31/03/07 09:06:
Richard Heathfield wrote:santosh said:
user923005 wrote:You actually proved not that it does, but that it doesn't.
<snip>
P.S.Actually it does, as this post illustrates.
Google (so far as I know) lacks any ability to set followups, [ ... ]
I think I actually proved that I didn't think before posting. :-)
Anyway my point stands.
You did successfully set a followup, you just set it to here.
--
Flash Gordon
.
- References:
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: santosh
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- From: santosh
- OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by Date: Re: C ethics question
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|