Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: "P.J. Plauger" <pjp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:56:54 -0400
<albert.neu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1175332434.269626.203040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What is the difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language
parts" of C99.
see
http://groups.google.at/group/microsoft.public.vc.language/browse_thread/thread/e9a67f0ff20a954b/bd2bada2bbdbce56?lnk=st&rnum=1#bd2bada2bbdbce56
I know that "Dinkum Compleat Libraries" (http://www.dinkumware.com/)
support the "library parts" of C99 - this probably relates to the C99
library headers and the functionality they provide.?
Are the "language parts" of C99 perhaps things like "variable
declarations" in the middle of {}-blocks? See below...
/******** test.c *********/
#include <stdio.h>
int main( void )
{
printf("hello world\n");
char c = 5; //variable declaration
return 0;
}
What else might be included in the "language parts" of C99?
If the piece that translates source code to object has to do it,
it's language. If it can be done in library headers and linkable
libraries, it's library.
P.J. Plauger
Dinkumware, Ltd.
http://www.dinkumware.com
.
- References:
- Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- From: albert . neu
- Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Prev by Date: Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1
- Next by Date: Re: Etymology of "struct"
- Previous by thread: Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Next by thread: Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
