comp.lang.c

• Date Index

---

• Computer Training Videos "now online", iggy350
• Dynamic lists of strings in C, hlubenow
  • Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C, Bill Pursell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Dynamic lists of strings in C, hlubenow
  • Dynamic lists of strings in C, hlubenow
    • Re: Dynamic lists of strings in C, Jens Thoms Toerring
• C ethics question, Servé Laurijssen
  • Re: C ethics question, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: C ethics question, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: C ethics question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C ethics question, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C ethics question, Barry
  • Re: C ethics question, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: C ethics question, CBFalconer
    • Re: C ethics question, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: C ethics question, Richard Heathfield
• Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), albert . neu
  • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), albert . neu
      • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), albert . neu
      • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), Servé Laurijssen
  • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), albert . neu
    • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), albert . neu
  • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), P.J. Plauger
    • Re: Visual C++ support of C99 by using "C++ mode" (/TP), Servé Laurijssen
• C99 library part of C++ TR1, albert . neu
  • Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1, albert . neu
  • Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1, P.J. Plauger
    • Re: C99 library part of C++ TR1, Servé Laurijssen
• Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99, albert . neu
  • Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99, P.J. Plauger
  • Re: Difference between "library parts" of C99 and "language parts" of C99, Keith Thompson
• OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, santosh
  • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, santosh
      • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Flash Gordon
    • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Flash Gordon
      • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Flash Gordon
      • Re: OT - Re: Looking for a *FAST* graphics library More options, Richard Heathfield
• Functions in socket, nick048
  • Re: Functions in socket, Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: Functions in socket, Cong Wang
• Restrict qualified pointers in C, Ken Camann
  • Re: Restrict qualified pointers in C, klaushuotari
  • Re: Restrict qualified pointers in C, Pierre Asselin
• height of a BST by iteration - kindly review my solution, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
• Etymology of "struct", Francine . Neary
  • Re: Etymology of "struct", William Ahern
    • [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct", Army1987
      • Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct", Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct", Manuel T
      • Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct", Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Re: Etymology of "struct", P.J. Plauger
  • Re: Etymology of "struct", Bill Leary
    • Re: Etymology of "struct", P.J. Plauger
• Sending a struct over TCP, Jack
  • Re: Sending a struct over TCP, Ian Collins
  • Re: Sending a struct over TCP, Tor Rustad
• Re: Programming algorithms with strings in C++, and transition from C by example!, Flash Gordon
• Re: C++ is complicated and C is bloated., hlubenow
  • Re: C++ is complicated and C is bloated., Flash Gordon
• Re: Bjarne Stroustrup (The Creator of C++): The C++ Programming Language - Third Edition, Ivar Rosquist
• Use of "." for structure members, cman
  • Re: Use of "." for structure members, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Use of "." for structure members, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Use of "." for structure members, SM Ryan
• C preprocessor, mohdalibaig
  • Re: C preprocessor, santosh
  • Re: C preprocessor, Mike Wahler
    • Re: C preprocessor, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C preprocessor, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C preprocessor, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: C preprocessor, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C preprocessor, Mike Wahler
      • Re: C preprocessor, Richard Heathfield
• pointer to structure array from main.c?, Steve
  • Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?, Steve
    • Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: pointer to structure array from main.c?, Joachim Schmitz
• k&r2 exercise 1-13 review, Anthony Irwin
  • Message not available
    • Re: k&r2 exercise 1-13 review, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: k&r2 exercise 1-13 review, user923005
• *p++ = tolower(*p));, Gunvant Patil
  • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, Chris Dollin
  • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, santosh
    • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, Gunvant Patil
  • Re: *p++ = tolower(*p));, christian.bau
• Question on macro, arunaling
  • Re: Question on macro, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Question on macro, SM Ryan
  • Re: Question on macro, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Question on macro, Army1987
• Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, stefano . verna
  • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Ian Collins
    • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, stefano . verna
      • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Ian Collins
      • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, CBFalconer
  • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Doug
  • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Pointer arithmetics in Solaris, Kenneth Brody
• About Union's question, 王超凡
  • Re: About Union's question, jaysome
  • Re: About Union's question, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: About Union's question, 王超凡
      • Re: About Union's question, jaysome
    • Re: About Union's question, Jack Klein
  • Re: About Union's question, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: About Union's question, Marcin
    • Re: About Union's question, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: About Union's question, Jack Klein
      • Re: About Union's question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: About Union's question, CBFalconer
      • Re: About Union's question, Robert Gamble
      • Re: About Union's question, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: About Union's question, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: About Union's question, Robert Gamble
      • Re: About Union's question, Robert Gamble
      • Re: About Union's question, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: About Union's question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Union's question, Army1987
      • Re: About Union's question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Union's question, Army1987
      • Re: About Union's question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About Union's question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: About Union's question, Richard Bos
      • Re: About Union's question, 王超凡
      • Re: About Union's question, Jack Klein
    • Re: About Union's question, Jack Klein
• pointers., mdh
  • Re: pointers., Mike Wahler
    • Re: (corr) pointers., Mike Wahler
      • Re: (corr) pointers., mdh
      • Re: (corr) pointers., Mike Wahler
      • Re: (corr) pointers., mdh
  • Re: pointers., Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Sometimes questions arise about C and C++ incompatibilities, user923005
• cool!!!!!!!!!!, aviel570
• List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, Spiro Trikaliotis
  • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, Ian Collins
  • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, user923005
  • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, user923005
  • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, P.J. Plauger
    • Re: List of differences in headers between C90 and C99?, Spiro Trikaliotis
• int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
  • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Eric Sosman
    • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, user923005
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Keith Thompson
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Eric Sosman
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Keith Thompson
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Eric Sosman
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Keith Thompson
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Keith Thompson
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
  • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, user923005
    • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, JimS
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, santosh
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Manuel T
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Barry
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Barry
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, CBFalconer
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, CBFalconer
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
  • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
    • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, JimS
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Army1987
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Chris Dollin
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: int main(void) { return main(); }, Chris Dollin
• doubts on scanf("%100[^\n]%*[^\n]", buff);, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: doubts on scanf("%100[^\n]%*[^\n]", buff);, Eric Sosman
• Reading a key inside a loop, hstagni
  • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, mark_bluemel
    • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Default User
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Jorgen Grahn
  • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Army1987
  • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Army1987
  • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, hstagni
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, jaysome
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, CBFalconer
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Army1987
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Army1987
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Army1987
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, CBFalconer
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, santosh
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, CBFalconer
    • Re: Reading a key inside a loop, Thomas Dickey
• Windows and Linux, Bastie
  • Re: Windows and Linux, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Windows and Linux, Bastie
      • Re: Windows and Linux, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Windows and Linux, Bastie
  • Re: Windows and Linux, mark_bluemel
  • Re: Windows and Linux, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Windows and Linux, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Windows and Linux, Bastie
      • Re: Windows and Linux, Nelu
      • Re: Windows and Linux, Jorgen Grahn
    • Re: Windows and Linux, CBFalconer
• Need help with problem, Scott
  • Re: Need help with problem, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
  • Re: Need help with problem, gw7rib
    • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
    • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
    • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
      • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
      • Re: Need help with problem, CBFalconer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need help with problem, Richard Tobin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
      • Re: Need help with problem, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
      • Re: Need help with problem, Ian Collins
      • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
    • Re: Need help with problem, Scott
  • Re: Need help with problem, CBFalconer
• Re: A question about sort stable, santosh
  • Re: A question about sort stable, lawrence . jones
  • Re: A question about sort stable, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question about sort stable, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: A question about sort stable, Eric Sosman
    • Re: A question about sort stable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Richard Tobin
      • Re: A question about sort stable, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Nelu
      • Re: A question about sort stable, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Nelu
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Eric Sosman
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Nelu
      • [OT] Re: A question about sort stable, Eric Sosman
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Nelu
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about sort stable, kyle york
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: A question about sort stable, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Flash Gordon
      • Re: A question about sort stable, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Joe Wright
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about sort stable, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about sort stable, Richard Tobin
      • Re: A question about sort stable, user923005
• cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, aviel570
• function length, koolj96825
  • Re: function length, gruikmusic
  • Re: function length, Ian Collins
  • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: function length, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: function length, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: function length, Ian Collins
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: function length, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: function length, CBFalconer
      • Re: function length, Default User
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: function length, Tor Rustad
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: function length, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: function length, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: function length, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: function length, CBFalconer
  • Re: function length, Chris Dollin
    • Re: function length, Jack Klein
      • Re: function length, Chris Dollin
      • Re: function length, Flash Gordon
      • Re: function length, Chris Dollin
      • Re: function length, Flash Gordon
      • Re: function length, koolj96825
      • Re: function length, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: function length, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: function length, Ian Collins
  • Re: function length, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: function length, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: function length, Chris Dollin
  • Re: function length, Eric Sosman
  • Re: function length, Michael
  • Re: function length, Charlton Wilbur
  • Re: function length, Default User
    • Re: function length, CBFalconer
      • Re: function length, Default User
  • Re: function length, Tor Rustad
• File Handling (Newbie), Kelly B
  • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Peter Nilsson
    • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Kelly B
  • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Gregor H .
    • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Mark McIntyre
  • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Flash Gordon
    • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Kelly B
      • Re: File Handling (Newbie), Flash Gordon
• regarding free, raghu
  • Re: regarding free, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: regarding free, raghu
      • Re: regarding free, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: regarding free, Keith Thompson
      • Re: regarding free, raghu
      • Re: regarding free, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: regarding free, Chris Dollin
      • Re: regarding free, Sheth Raxit
      • Re: regarding free, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: regarding free, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: regarding free, Martin Ambuhl
• A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?, spammenotplui31
  • Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?, Stan Milam
    • Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?, spammenotplui31
      • Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?, llothar
      • Re: A 64-bit binary returning a value to a 32-bit binary?, Tim Prince
• cooll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, aviel570
• cool!!!!!!!!!, aviel570
• How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, kvnsmnsn
  • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, kvnsmnsn
      • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Nelu
      • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, kvnsmnsn
      • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, CBFalconer
  • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Nelu
  • Re: How to Keep <fscanf()> to not Stop when it Comes to a Blank, Robert Gamble
• Accessing enumeration strings in macros, kenkahn
  • Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros, kenkahn
  • Re: Accessing enumeration strings in macros, Eric Sosman
• What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, albert . neu
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
    • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Chris Dollin
      • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Greg Comeau
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Nick Keighley
    • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, Chris Hills
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, JimS
  • Re: What's going on with C Compilers and C99??, J. J. Farrell
• Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int, duylam76
  • Re: Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int, Nelu
  • Re: Read 16-bit block as a 32-bit int, Stephen Sprunk
• Source navigation, PAolo
  • Re: Source navigation, Bill Pursell
    • Re: Source navigation, PAolo
      • Re: Source navigation, Nelu
  • Re: Source navigation, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Source navigation, EventHelix.com
  • Re: Source navigation, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: Source navigation, PAolo
• Learning C?, ***** charles
  • Re: Learning C?, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Learning C?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Learning C?, ***** charles
      • Re: Learning C?, Gregor H .
      • Re: Learning C?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Learning C?, ***** charles
      • Re: Learning C?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Learning C?, ***** charles
      • Re: Learning C?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, hlubenow
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, hlubenow
      • Re: Learning C?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, hlubenow
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Learning C?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Learning C?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Learning C?, pete
  • Re: Learning C?, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Learning C?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Learning C?, ***** charles
      • Re: Learning C?, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Learning C?, Ian Collins
  • Re: Learning C?, Randy Howard
  • Re: Learning C?, Gregor H .
    • Re: Learning C?, Gregor H .
  • Re: Learning C?, John Bode
  • Re: Learning C?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Learning C?, Anthony Irwin
  • Re: Learning C?, Pierre Asselin
  • Re: Learning C?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Learning C?, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Learning C?, Army1987
  • Re: Learning C?, Al Balmer
• socket programming, multiple connections, Jack
  • Re: socket programming, multiple connections, Default User
  • Re: socket programming, multiple connections, PAolo
• Creating sequence points using macros, ais523
  • Re: Creating sequence points using macros, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Creating sequence points using macros, ais523
• How to pass a struct to a function, Bill
  • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Chris Dollin
    • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Bill
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Bill Pursell
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Bill
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Al Balmer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Al Balmer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Al Balmer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, CBFalconer
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Chris Dollin
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Chris Dollin
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Army1987
  • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, John Bode
  • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Mr John FO Evans
    • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, Jack Klein
  • Re: How to pass a struct to a function, CBFalconer
• Macro concatenation, K. Jennings
  • Re: Macro concatenation, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: Macro concatenation, K. Jennings
      • Re: Macro concatenation, Dave Hansen
  • Re: Macro concatenation, Thad Smith
    • Re: Macro concatenation, Peter Nilsson
• Confused Newbie, ilan . pillemer
  • Re: Confused Newbie, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Confused Newbie, ilan . pillemer
    • Re: Confused Newbie, ilAn
• cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, aviel570
• Type name from Variable, rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Type name from Variable, jaysome
    • Re: Type name from Variable, rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Type name from Variable, SM Ryan
    • Re: Type name from Variable, rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Type name from Variable, SM Ryan
      • Re: Type name from Variable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type name from Variable, rohitjogya@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Type name from Variable, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Type name from Variable, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type name from Variable, SM Ryan
• Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, dolphin
  • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Lane Straatman
  • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Bill Reid
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Bill Reid
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Bill Reid
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Martin Golding
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, SM Ryan
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, user923005
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Sheth Raxit
      • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Sheth Raxit
    • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, user923005
  • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Sheth Raxit
  • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, SM Ryan
    • Re: Is it a good thing that program mix C and C++?, Charlton Wilbur
• how to quit, mynameisthomasanderson
  • Re: how to quit, Daniel Rudy
  • Re: how to quit, CBFalconer
  • Re: how to quit, user923005
    • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, user923005
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Richard Tobin
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Default User
      • Re: how to quit, Keith Thompson
      • Re: how to quit, Keith Thompson
      • Re: how to quit, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: how to quit, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: how to quit, user923005
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, user923005
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: how to quit, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: how to quit, user923005
      • Re: how to quit, Thomas Dickey
  • Re: how to quit, SM Ryan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • how to quit, Thomas
    • Re: how to quit, Bill Pursell
• What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, user923005
    • Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, Ian Collins
  • Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, Keith Thompson
  • Re: What is the purpose of the -Wno-deprecate option, Igmar Palsenberg
• problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, hyperboogie
  • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, hyperboogie
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Doug
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, hyperboogie
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Doug
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, CBFalconer
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, CBFalconer
  • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Doug
  • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Ian Collins
    • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, hyperboogie
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Doug
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, hyperboogie
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Ian Collins
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Default User
      • Re: problems with dynamic allocation in an ellipses function, Ian Collins
• c code refactoring or optimizing, Dennis Yurichev
  • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Dennis Yurichev
      • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Flash Gordon
    • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Eric Sosman
  • Re: c code refactoring or optimizing, Ira Baxter
• Problem in Socket Programming, abhi
  • Re: Problem in Socket Programming, Dave Vandervies
    • Re: Problem in Socket Programming, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Problem in Socket Programming, Kenneth Brody
• Memory Question, Clement
  • Re: Memory Question, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Memory Question, Clement
      • Re: Memory Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Memory Question, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Memory Question, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Memory Question, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Memory Question, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Memory Question, SM Ryan
      • Re: Memory Question, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Memory Question, user923005
      • Re: Memory Question, Ed Prochak
  • Re: Memory Question, user923005
• How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, quakewang
  • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, quakewang
  • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Ian Collins
  • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Roberto Waltman
      • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Roberto Waltman
      • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: How to use a const pointer in switch case ?, CBFalconer
• open a *.dat file, Pier
  • Re: open a *.dat file, angrybaldguy
    • Re: open a *.dat file, daya
    • Re: open a *.dat file, Keith Thompson
• EOF from printf, v4vijayakumar
  • Re: EOF from printf, Keith Thompson
    • Re: EOF from printf, v4vijayakumar
      • Re: EOF from printf, Richard Bos
      • Re: EOF from printf, Richard Bos
      • Re: EOF from printf, Keith Thompson
      • Re: EOF from printf, Keith Thompson
      • Re: EOF from printf, CBFalconer
      • Re: EOF from printf, Richard Bos
      • Re: EOF from printf, Keith Thompson
      • Re: EOF from printf, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: EOF from printf, Servé Laurijssen
  • Re: EOF from printf, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: EOF from printf, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: EOF from printf, Flash Gordon
  • Re: EOF from printf, CBFalconer
    • Re: EOF from printf, Mark L Pappin
      • Re: EOF from printf, CBFalconer
      • Re: EOF from printf, Default User
• Re: BUILDER C++ 6, klaushuotari
  • Re: BUILDER C++ 6, williamcorrea85
    • Re: BUILDER C++ 6, Keith Thompson
      • Re: BUILDER C++ 6, Servé Laurijssen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BUILDER C++ 6, CBFalconer
• 'typedef' issue, Roman Mashak
  • Re: 'typedef' issue, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: 'typedef' issue, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: 'typedef' issue, Roman Mashak
      • Re: 'typedef' issue, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: 'typedef' issue, Roman Mashak
      • Re: 'typedef' issue, Bill Pursell
      • Re: 'typedef' issue, Fred Kleinschmidt
• Please help with newbie error, somebody
  • Re: Please help with newbie error, Anthony Irwin
  • Re: Please help with newbie error, user923005
    • Re: Please help with newbie error, somebody
      • Re: Please help with newbie error, CBFalconer
      • Re: Please help with newbie error, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Please help with newbie error, CBFalconer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Please help with newbie error, Anthony Irwin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Please help with newbie error, somebody
• file processing in c, wolky
  • Re: file processing in c, Nelu
    • Re: file processing in c, Nelu
  • Re: file processing in c, Martin Golding
    • Re: file processing in c, CBFalconer
• software, wolter
  • Re: software, user923005
  • Re: software, CBFalconer
• [Q]extern in front of function definition?, djhong
  • Re: [Q]extern in front of function definition?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Al Balmer
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: extern in front of function definition?, Richard Heathfield
• execve system call, neojia@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: execve system call, Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: execve system call, SM Ryan
  • Re: execve system call, CBFalconer
    • Re: execve system call, Kenny McCormack
• representations, Lane Straatman
  • Re: representations, Army1987
    • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
      • Re: representations, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
      • Re: representations, Al Balmer
      • Re: representations, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: representations, Old Wolf
      • Re: representations, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: representations, Joe Wright
      • Re: representations, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
      • Re: representations, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: representations, Old Wolf
      • Re: representations, Fred Kleinschmidt
      • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
      • Re: representations, Chris Torek
  • Re: representations, Keith Thompson
    • Re: representations, Keith Thompson
      • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
      • Re: representations, CBFalconer
      • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
  • Re: representations, pete
    • Re: representations, Lane Straatman
• Automatically generate file names, Freddy
  • Re: Automatically generate file names, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Automatically generate file names, Mike Wahler
    • Re: Automatically generate file names, Jack Klein
      • Re: Automatically generate file names, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Automatically generate file names, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Automatically generate file names, Malcolm McLean
• 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
  • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
      • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
      • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, CBFalconer
  • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
  • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, christian.bau
    • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
  • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: 'Portable' Measurement of Pointer Alignment in C?, Brian Gladman
• About the -rdynamic flag, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Army1987
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Jack Klein
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Chris Dollin
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Al Balmer
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Chris Dollin
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Default User
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, CBFalconer
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Richard Bos
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, CBFalconer
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Chris Dollin
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Al Balmer
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, CBFalconer
  • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Chris Dollin
  • Re: About the -rdynamic flag, Army1987
• Is C faster than fortran?, Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Richard Harter
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Chris Torek
    • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Nelu
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Nelu
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Nelu
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Nelu
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Al Balmer
      • [OT] Bush moan (was: Is C faster than fortran?), CBFalconer
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Lane Straatman
    • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, user923005
    • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, user923005
      • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Tim Prince
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, SM Ryan
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Pierre Asselin
• const non-pointer function parameters, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: const non-pointer function parameters, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: const non-pointer function parameters, Ian Collins
  • Re: const non-pointer function parameters, pete
  • Re: const non-pointer function parameters, Army1987
• performance question related to BST traversal, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: performance question related to BST traversal, Richard Harter
• [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?, mr . hong
  • Re: [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?, Flash Gordon
    • Re: [Q] Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Any unix extension to standard C library for providing set collection operations?, user923005
• sizeof dataTypes at run time, Raman
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, CBFalconer
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Tobin
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, jamsheedm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, ramana
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, CBFalconer
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, CBFalconer
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, ramana
      • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Jack Klein
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, CBFalconer
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Jack Klein
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, ramana
    • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: sizeof dataTypes at run time, Army1987
• question about k&r2, Anthony Irwin
  • Re: question about k&r2, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: question about k&r2, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: question about k&r2, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: question about k&r2, CBFalconer
      • Re: question about k&r2, Default User
      • Re: question about k&r2, Craig Franck
      • Re: question about k&r2, Richard Tobin
      • Re: question about k&r2, pete
      • Re: question about k&r2, coder
      • Re: question about k&r2, pete
      • Re: question about k&r2, CBFalconer
      • Re: question about k&r2, Dave Hansen
      • Re: question about k&r2, CBFalconer
      • Re: question about k&r2, CBFalconer
      • Re: question about k&r2, Old Wolf
      • Re: question about k&r2, CBFalconer
      • Re: question about k&r2, Keith Thompson
      • Re: question about k&r2, Old Wolf
      • Re: question about k&r2, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: question about k&r2, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: question about k&r2, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: question about k&r2, Army1987
• Huffman Algorithm, Udhay
  • Re: [OT] Huffman Algorithm, Mike Wahler
    • Re: [OT] Huffman Algorithm, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Huffman Algorithm, Vallabha
• CUnit Query, gamename
  • Re: CUnit Query, Roland Pibinger
  • Re: CUnit Query, Flash Gordon
  • Re: CUnit Query, Keith Thompson
    • Re: CUnit Query, gamename
      • Re: CUnit Query, Flash Gordon
• Blocks and Their Use, Martin
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Ian Collins
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Ian Collins
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Jack Klein
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, SM Ryan
    • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Martin
    • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Ian Collins
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Blocks and Their Use, CBFalconer
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Army1987
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, CBFalconer
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Ian Collins
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, jaysome
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, CBFalconer
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, CBFalconer
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, CBFalconer
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Army1987
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Martin
      • Re: Blocks and Their Use, Ian Collins
• Copying Structures, Mr John FO Evans
  • Re: Copying Structures, Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: Copying Structures, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Copying Structures, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Copying Structures, Mr John FO Evans
      • Re: Copying Structures, Ian Collins
      • Re: Copying Structures, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Structures, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Structures, Ian Collins
  • Re: Copying Structures, Vallabha
• How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), vignesh4u
  • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), CBFalconer
    • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Army1987
      • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), CBFalconer
  • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Malcolm McLean
  • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Army1987
    • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Flash Gordon
  • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Army1987
    • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Army1987
  • Re: How to Return an array of strings in C (char**), Barry Schwarz
• explain the result, param
  • Re: explain the result, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: explain the result, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: explain the result, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: explain the result, Army1987
      • Re: explain the result, Keith Thompson
      • Re: explain the result, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: explain the result, pete
    • Re: explain the result, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: explain the result, Old Wolf
      • Re: explain the result, pete
  • Re: explain the result, Bill Pursell
    • Re: explain the result, pete
  • Re: explain the result, Richard Tobin
    • Re: explain the result, Keith Thompson
      • Re: explain the result, Richard Tobin
  • Re: explain the result, Barry Schwarz
• Discarding unread data after scanf(), Army1987
  • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), pete
    • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), Army1987
      • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), Army1987
      • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), pete
  • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), pete
  • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), Keith Thompson
  • Re: Discarding unread data after scanf(), Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• pointer type casting, cheesiong@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: pointer type casting, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: pointer type casting, pete
    • Re: pointer type casting, Keith Thompson
      • Re: pointer type casting, cheesiong@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: pointer type casting, CBFalconer
      • Re: pointer type casting, Ian Collins
      • Re: pointer type casting, Army1987
  • Re: pointer type casting, CBFalconer
    • Re: pointer type casting, Keith Thompson
• using strcpy to copy from a char, Alok Kumar
  • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Keith Thompson
  • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, klaushuotari
    • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Barry
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, klaushuotari
  • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, christian.bau
  • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, websnarf
    • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, CBFalconer
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Chris Torek
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Army1987
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, CBFalconer
      • Re: using strcpy to copy from a char, Richard Tobin
• Problems with basics.., iCoder
  • Re: Problems with basics.., Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: Problems with basics.., Flash Gordon
• cont char* p , is allowing values to change, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, Homuncilus
  • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, pete
    • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, pete
      • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, pete
      • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, pete
  • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, Bill Pursell
  • Re: cont char* p , is allowing values to change, CBFalconer
• how do you pass an array by value, Abhi
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, santosh
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Army1987
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, pete
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Chris Dollin
    • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Tim Prince
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Chris Dollin
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Abhi
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, Chris Dollin
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, CBFalconer
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, John Bode
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value - TPA, Default User
      • Re: how do you pass an array by value, pete
  • Re: how do you pass an array by value, SM Ryan
• primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Carramba
  • Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Erdinç
    • Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Carramba
  • Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Carramba
  • Re: primes with Child's Binomial Theorem, Martin Ambuhl
• almost understood, ericunfuk
  • Re: almost understood, Bill Pursell
  • Re: almost understood, santosh
    • Re: almost understood, Eric Sosman
• Ugly Type Conversion, Lionel Zhou
  • Re: Ugly Type Conversion, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Ugly Type Conversion, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Ugly Type Conversion, Keith Thompson
• Validity/Invalidity of the code, Rajesh S R
  • Re: Validity/Invalidity of the code, Harald van Dijk
• Compile Time Error ... arghh, Finger . Octopus
  • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Finger . Octopus
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Finger . Octopus
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Finger . Octopus
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Finger . Octopus
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Compile Time Error ... arghh, Mark McIntyre
• print binary representation, Carramba
  • Re: print binary representation, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: print binary representation, Carramba
      • Re: print binary representation, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: print binary representation, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: print binary representation, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: print binary representation, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: print binary representation, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: print binary representation, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: print binary representation, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: print binary representation, pete
      • Re: print binary representation, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: print binary representation, Joe Wright
  • Re: print binary representation, jaysome
  • Re: print binary representation, Beej Jorgensen
  • Re: print binary representation, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: print binary representation, Carramba
      • Re: print binary representation, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: print binary representation, pete
      • Re: print binary representation, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: print binary representation, pete
      • Re: print binary representation, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: print binary representation, pete
  • Re: print binary representation, pete
  • Re: print binary representation, SM Ryan
  • Re: print binary representation, CBFalconer
  • Re: print binary representation, Army1987
• Trap Int21h problem, gerotica
  • Re: Trap Int21h problem, gerotica
  • Re: Trap Int21h problem, CBFalconer
    • Re: Trap Int21h problem, gerotica
  • Re: Trap Int21h problem, Jack Klein
• feof(), fseek(), fread(), ericunfuk
  • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Ben Pfaff
    • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), ericunfuk
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Ben Pfaff
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), ericunfuk
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), ericunfuk
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Chris Torek
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Joe Wright
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Sjouke Burry
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Joe Wright
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Walter Roberson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: feof(), fseek(), fread(), Gordon Burditt
• reading file, ericunfuk
  • Re: reading file, ericunfuk
    • Re: reading file, Keith Thompson
      • Re: reading file, SM Ryan
      • Re: reading file, Richard Tobin
  • Re: reading file, Richard Tobin
• Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
  • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
    • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Barry
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Chris Torek
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Jack Klein
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Uses of offsetof?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Old Wolf
  • Re: Uses of offsetof?, Iwo Mergler
• Cross platform lib in 'C', Carnage
  • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', user923005
    • (OT) Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Barry
  • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Keith Thompson
    • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Carnage
      • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', CBFalconer
      • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Carnage
      • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', CBFalconer
      • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', user923005
  • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Cross platform lib in 'C', Carnage
• Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Francine . Neary
  • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, CBFalconer
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Mark F. Haigh
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, jaysome
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Army1987
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Richard Heathfield
      • Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), CBFalconer
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), pete
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), CBFalconer
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), CBFalconer
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Blank verse and style (was: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends), CBFalconer
  • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Casting to unsigned char for isupper() and friends, Old Wolf
• fseek(), ericunfuk
  • Re: fseek(), Mark McIntyre
    • Re: fseek(), ericunfuk
      • Re: fseek(), Richard Tobin
      • Re: fseek(), Mark McIntyre
  • Re: fseek(), CBFalconer
  • Re: fseek(), Chris Torek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • fseek(), ericunfuk
    • Re: fseek(), Walter Roberson
• fseek() clears EOF?, ericunfuk
  • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, wumei2010
      • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: fseek() clears EOF?, Keith Thompson
• unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, ehabaziz2001
  • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, user923005
    • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, user923005
    • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, ehabaziz2001
      • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, CBFalconer
    • Re: unexpected character displayed infront of the variable, Barry Schwarz
• How to load the whole file?, Finger . Octopus
  • Re: How to load the whole file?, Walter Roberson
    • Re: How to load the whole file?, Finger . Octopus
    • Re: How to load the whole file?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: How to load the whole file?, Walter Roberson
    • Re: How to load the whole file?, CBFalconer
  • Re: How to load the whole file?, user923005
    • Re: How to load the whole file?, Dave Vandervies
  • Re: How to load the whole file?, Malcolm McLean
• newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, ericunfuk
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, ericunfuk
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, CBFalconer
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, ericunfuk
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, gw7rib
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Doug
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Doug
      • [OT] Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Doug
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Robert Gamble
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
    • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Bill Pursell
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Army1987
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Bill Pursell
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Army1987
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Army1987
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, pete
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Army1987
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Chris Torek
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, pete
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Army1987
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, CBFalconer
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Chris Torek
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: newbie question: whats wrong with my code?, Chris Torek
• dependency of sizeof operator, vandana
  • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, daya
  • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Richard Tobin
    • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
    • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Jack Klein
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Keith Thompson
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Coos Haak
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dependency of sizeof operator, Flash Gordon
• read and write binary file, ericunfuk
  • Re: read and write binary file, Ulrich Eckhardt
    • Re: read and write binary file, ericunfuk
      • Re: read and write binary file, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: read and write binary file, daya
    • Re: read and write binary file, Flash Gordon
  • Re: read and write binary file, Ben Pfaff
• Memory leak, antani
  • Re: Memory leak, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Memory leak, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Memory leak, Flash Gordon
• Testing for a type, bytebro
  • Re: Testing for a type, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Testing for a type, bytebro
• I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C, Dave Cullen
  • Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C, bytebro
  • Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C, Pietro Cerutti
  • Re: I need Tripple DES encryption algorithm in C, Tor Rustad
• Raw disk access, Daniel Rudy
  • Re: Raw disk access, Ian Collins
  • Re: Raw disk access, christian.bau
  • Re: Raw disk access, Daniel Rudy
    • Re: Raw disk access, daya
      • Re: Raw disk access, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Raw disk access, Daniel Rudy
      • Re: Raw disk access, Flash Gordon
• K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14, mark_bluemel
  • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-14, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Debugging core in different environment, sunil
  • Re: Debugging core in different environment, Ian Collins
• fseek() newbie question, ericunfuk
  • Re: fseek() newbie question, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: fseek() newbie question, websnarf
• PHP Development Resources Directory, HotFreePHP.Com
• printf question, Jamesm
  • Re: printf question, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: printf question, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: printf question, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: printf question, ¬a\\/b
  • Re: printf question, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: printf question, Old Wolf
  • Re: printf question, Haider
• Compilier problem, skasetty
  • Re: Compilier problem, Ian Collins
    • Re: Compilier problem, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Compilier problem, Jack Klein
    • Re: Compilier problem, Roberto Waltman
  • Re: Compilier problem, Ulrich Eckhardt
• preprocessor: macros in a string..., .rhavin grobert
  • Re: preprocessor: macros in a string..., Walter Roberson
    • Re: preprocessor: macros in a string..., Peter Nilsson
      • Re: preprocessor: macros in a string..., .rhavin grobert
      • Re: preprocessor: macros in a string..., Eric Sosman
      • Re: preprocessor: macros in a string..., Robert Gamble
• Aliasing in assignment, Lauri Alanko
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Dave Vandervies
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, pete
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Old Wolf
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, christian.bau
    • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Mark F. Haigh
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, James Dow Allen
  • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Lauri Alanko
    • Re: Aliasing in assignment, CBFalconer
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Aliasing in assignment, CBFalconer
• static, vim
  • Re: static, Eric Sosman
    • Re: static, vim
      • Re: static, Eric Sosman
      • Re: static, Eric Sosman
    • Message not available
      • Re: static, Ben Pfaff
• cos function, polas
  • Re: cos function, Richard Tobin
    • Re: cos function, polas
  • Re: cos function, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: cos function, Beej Jorgensen
  • Re: cos function, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: cos function, polas
      • Re: cos function, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: cos function, Flash Gordon
  • Re: cos function, user923005
• Error related to Structure or Union, the_init
  • Re: Error related to Structure or Union, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Error related to Structure or Union, Richard Bos
• Seeking getoptlong(), Baron Samedi
  • Re: Seeking getoptlong(), Lew Pitcher
    • Re: Seeking getoptlong(), Kenny McCormack
• Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, pavi
  • Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, Ian Collins
    • Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, pavi
      • Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, Ian Collins
      • Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Organisation of segments in the C's executable a.out, Kenny McCormack
• modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2, arnuld
  • Re: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2, arnuld
    • horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2), arnuld
      • Re: horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2), Barry Schwarz
      • Re: horizontal histogram (was: modified "histogram" exercise from K&R2), arnuld
• Poll Loop (Asynchronous IO), chsalvia
  • Re: Poll Loop (Asynchronous IO), Ian Collins
• good hard copy c reference, Anthony Irwin
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, Ian Collins
    • Re: good hard copy c reference, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: good hard copy c reference, Chris Dollin
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, CBFalconer
    • Re: good hard copy c reference, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: good hard copy c reference, Army1987
      • Re: good hard copy c reference, CBFalconer
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, Richard Bos
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, Roland Pibinger
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, bytebro
  • Re: good hard copy c reference, Roberto Waltman
• strdup, klaushuotari
  • Re: strdup, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: strdup, klaushuotari
      • Re: strdup, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, klaushuotari
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, klaushuotari
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: strdup, Richard Tobin
      • Re: strdup, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: strdup, Richard Bos
      • Re: strdup, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: strdup, Richard Bos
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, jaysome
      • Re: strdup, pete
      • Re: strdup, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
      • Re: strdup, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: strdup, Richard Bos
      • Re: strdup, Flash Gordon
      • Re: strdup, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: strdup, Richard Bos
      • Re: strdup, ais523
      • Re: strdup, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, P.J. Plauger
      • Re: strdup, lawrence . jones
  • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: strdup, Flash Gordon
    • Re: strdup, Richard Tobin
      • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: strdup, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: strdup, Richard Bos
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, Richard Tobin
      • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: strdup, Richard Tobin
      • Re: strdup, CBFalconer
      • Re: strdup, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: strdup, Richard Tobin
      • Re: strdup, Christopher Benson-Manica
      • Re: strdup, Keith Thompson
    • Re: strdup, Old Wolf
      • Re: strdup, Roland Pibinger
• this is perfect !, inurasalangova@xxxxxxxxx
• delirious program, episode II, Army1987
  • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
  • Re: delirious program, episode II, user923005
    • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, Old Wolf
  • Message not available
    • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
  • Message not available
    • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, Keith Thompson
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, pete
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, Keith Thompson
      • Re: delirious program, episode II, Army1987
  • Re: delirious program, episode II, Old Wolf
  • Re: delirious program, episode II, Keith Thompson
• About Memory Allocation and function calls, william
  • Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls, Francine . Neary
    • Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls, pete
  • Re: About Memory Allocation and function calls, Barry Schwarz
• email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++), lishengs
  • Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++), CBFalconer
    • Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++), Keith Thompson
  • Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++), user923005
  • Re: email message parser wrote in C available (not in C++), artifact . one
• Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, Old Wolf
    • Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, CBFalconer
    • Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Sorta-OT: John Backus obit, Richard Bos
• Trouble with formats in printf, Sanjay Kulkarni
  • Re: Trouble with formats in printf, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Trouble with formats in printf, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Trouble with formats in printf, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Trouble with formats in printf, Beej Jorgensen
  • Re: Trouble with formats in printf, Army1987
• "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), pandit
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), AndersWang
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e) - TPA, Default User
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ivar Rosquist
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e) - TPA, Default User
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Flash Gordon
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), CBFalconer
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Richard Bos
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), user923005
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Anthony Irwin
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Anthony Irwin
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Richard Heathfield
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), pete
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), pete
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), pete
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), CBFalconer
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), J. J. Farrell
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), J. J. Farrell
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Ernie Wright
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Shapalov
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), santosh
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Richard Heathfield
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), arnuld
    • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), santosh
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), arnuld
      • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), CBFalconer
  • Re: "a book on c" Kelly & Pohl (4e), Tor Rustad
• Memset is faster than simple loop?, AndersWang
  • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, AndersWang
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Randy Howard
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, AndersWang
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Kevin D . Quitt
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, AndersWang
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, AndersWang
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, user923005
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, user923005
      • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Randy Howard
  • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Racaille
  • Re: Memset is faster than simple loop?, Tor Rustad
• please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program, jyck91
  • Re: please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program, mark_bluemel
  • Re: please help me to correct/ build/ complete the program, Nick Keighley
• system() function and current working directory, gio
  • Re: system() function and current working directory, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: system() function and current working directory, gio
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Walter Roberson
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Richard Bos
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, gio
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, gio
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Walter Roberson
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, CBFalconer
      • Re: system() function and current working directory, Richard Bos
  • Re: system() function and current working directory, SM Ryan
• Logging library, sug
  • Re: Logging library, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Logging library, Randy Howard
• redraw shaking problem !, black(flashing vampire)
  • Re: redraw shaking problem !, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: redraw shaking problem !, black(flashing vampire)
      • Re: redraw shaking problem !, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: redraw shaking problem !, black(flashing vampire)
• What is "typedef struct" ?, cman
  • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, cman
      • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: What is "typedef struct" ? - TPA, Default User
  • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Daniel Rudy
    • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Francine . Neary
      • Re: What is "typedef struct" ?, Daniel Rudy
• Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Richard Heathfield
    • Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), CBFalconer
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Where is 42? (was: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code ...)), pete
  • Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Richard Tobin
    • Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Places=lvalues and <ot>Pop11</ot> (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Flash Gordon
• K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, user923005
    • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, Gawain
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, p_cricket_guy
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, arnuld
  • K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), arnuld
    • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), mark_bluemel
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), sololoquist
    • Re: K&R2, section1.6, solution TOO complicated (was: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13), Gregor H .
  • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section1.6, exercise 1-13, Barry Schwarz
• Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, ajba74
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Anthony Irwin
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, arnuld
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, arnuld
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Roland Pibinger
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Default User
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, user923005
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Ivar Rosquist
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, llothar
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, arnuld
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, arnuld
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, llothar
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Default User
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Randy Howard
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, llothar
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Randy Howard
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Racaille
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Randy Howard
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Guillaume
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, John Bode
  • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?, Malcolm McLean
• Anyone can explain the meaning of following info, pupopg
  • Re: Anyone can explain the meaning of following info, user923005
• Puzzle about multi definitions, erichain
  • Re: Puzzle about multi definitions, user923005
    • Re: Puzzle about multi definitions, Jack Klein
• Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, zavnobih
  • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, zavnobih
  • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, user923005
    • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, zavnobih
      • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, user923005
      • Re: Problem by sorting array of structures using qsort, zavnobih
• 2 C || ~ 2 C, klaushuotari
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Flash Gordon
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Keith Thompson
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, user923005
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Erik de Castro Lopo
    • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, CBFalconer
      • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Clever Monkey
      • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Chris Dollin
    • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Keith Thompson
    • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Ian Malone
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, Pierre Asselin
  • Re: 2 C || ~ 2 C, llothar
• Debugging from AIX server, gopal
  • Re: Debugging from AIX server, Ian Collins
  • Re: Debugging from AIX server, Walter Roberson
    • Re: Debugging from AIX server, Richard Heathfield
• Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
    • Re: Planned coverage of CookBook/Matrix, mySituation (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Flash Gordon
• C rulez, klaushuotari
  • Re: C rulez, user923005
    • Re: C rulez, Randy Howard
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C rulez, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C rulez, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C rulez, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, CBFalconer
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, pete
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, CBFalconer
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Tobin
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C rulez, Al Balmer
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C rulez, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C rulez, CBFalconer
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C rulez, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: C rulez, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Tobin
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Bos
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Tobin
      • Re: C rulez, user923005
      • Re: C rulez, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Tobin
      • Re: C rulez, Richard Bos
• CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
    • Re: CookBook/Matrix document, CGI-SMTP (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Flash Gordon
• Job Opportunity, Rameet
• stdarg definitions, cman
  • Re: stdarg definitions, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: stdarg definitions, Dave Vandervies
    • Re: stdarg definitions, Chris Torek
• K&R2 1.5.4 example programme does not work, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 1.5.4 example programme does not work, arnuld
• Quine, singlepoint
  • Re: Quine, pasalic . zaharije
    • Re: Quine, ais523
      • Re: Quine, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Quine, jxh
      • Re: Quine, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Quine, jxh
      • Re: Quine, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Quine, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Quine, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Quine, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Quine, Peter Nilsson
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, mark_bluemel
    • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, Gregor H .
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, Gregor H .
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-10, Gregor H .
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, mark_bluemel
    • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, mark_bluemel
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Gregor H .
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Gregor H .
    • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Gregor H .
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Keith Thompson
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Keith Thompson
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-9, Gregor H .
• K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8, user923005
    • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8, user923005
  • Re: K&R2 - section 1.5.3 , exercise 1-8, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Spot the error..., NwsGrp1
  • Re: Spot the error..., Ian Collins
    • Re: Spot the error..., NwsGrp1
  • Re: Spot the error..., Bavo
    • Re: Spot the error..., Army1987
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
  • Re: Spot the error..., Beej Jorgensen
    • Re: Spot the error..., NwsGrp1
      • Re: Spot the error..., Randy Howard
  • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Spot the error..., Flash Gordon
      • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., Flash Gordon
      • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Tobin
      • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Spot the error..., CBFalconer
      • Re: Spot the error..., Randy Howard
      • Re: [OT] Spot the error..., Ian Collins
      • Re: [OT] Spot the error..., Randy Howard
      • Re: [OT] Spot the error..., Richard Tobin
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., Randy Howard
      • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Spot the error..., Flash Gordon
      • Re: Spot the error..., Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Flash Gordon
      • Re: Spot the error..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Spot the error..., Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Spot the error..., Gregor H .
      • Re: Spot the error..., CBFalconer
      • Re: Spot the error..., christian.bau
  • Re: Spot the error..., user923005
  • Re: Spot the error..., CBFalconer
• CookBook/Matrix document (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: CookBook/Matrix document, CBFalconer
• Nitpicking bad jargon such as "lvalue" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Nitpicking bad jargon such as "lvalue" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
• monitoring function call in debug logs, royi . scalemp
  • Re: monitoring function call in debug logs, Ian Collins
  • Re: monitoring function call in debug logs, mark_bluemel
• Number of characters required for FLT_MAX, artifact . one
  • Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX, artifact . one
      • Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Number of characters required for FLT_MAX, artifact . one
• BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, william
  • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Nick Keighley
      • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, william
      • Re: BUG: memory where pointer pointing to changed accidently, Jens Thoms Toerring
• ascii pwned by reckless C, herning
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, Racaille
    • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, herning
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, Clever Monkey
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, user923005
  • Re: ascii pwned by reckless C, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
  • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Anthony Irwin
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, CBFalconer
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Old Wolf
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, CBFalconer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, jjmillertime
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
  • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, James Dow Allen
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Help me with a class assignment, pete
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, user923005
      • Re: Help me with a class assignment, pete
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help me with a class assignment, pete
• Problem printing Hexadecimal, abhishekkarnik
  • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Tobias Rischer
  • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Hallvard B Furuseth
    • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, abhishekkarnik
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal - TPA, Default User
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal - GAL, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Walter Roberson
    • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Old Wolf
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, pete
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Old Wolf
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Walter Roberson
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Old Wolf
      • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, CBFalconer
  • Re: Problem printing Hexadecimal, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
• Char pointer - How to give value?, alij
  • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Francine . Neary
    • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, alij
  • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Tobias Rischer
    • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Ed Prochak
      • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Doug
      • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Bill Pursell
      • Re: Char pointer - How to give value?, Nick Keighley
• Re: little games, Nelu
• How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, william
  • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, mark_bluemel
    • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, william
      • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, william
      • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, william
      • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, mark_bluemel
  • Re: How 'main(int argc, char ** argv)' is implemented?, Nick Keighley
• Re: Hello, CBFalconer
  • Re: Hello, Richard Bos
  • Re: Hello, Keith Thompson
• help me to write a base conversion program, jyck91
  • Re: help me to write a base conversion program, mark_bluemel
    • Re: help me to write a base conversion program, jyck91
  • Re: help me to write a base conversion program, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: help me to write a base conversion program, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: help me to write a base conversion program, Charlton Wilbur
• multiple function definitions, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: multiple function definitions, Fred Kleinschmidt
  • Re: multiple function definitions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: multiple function definitions, Jack Klein
      • Re: multiple function definitions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: multiple function definitions, Jack Klein
• multiple global variable definitions, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Fred Kleinschmidt
    • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Flash Gordon
  • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Flash Gordon
      • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: multiple global variable definitions, Flash Gordon
• POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, coder
  • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Chris Dollin
    • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, coder
      • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Flash Gordon
      • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Eric Sosman
      • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Chris Dollin
      • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Eric Sosman
  • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, mark_bluemel
  • Re: POINTER_MAX and POINTER_MIN??, Barry Schwarz
• "Fork" in Windows, anders
  • Re: "Fork" in Windows, Ian Collins
    • Re: "Fork" in Windows, Tobias Rischer
  • Re: "Fork" in Windows, CBFalconer
• qsort descending order, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: qsort descending order, Richard Heathfield
  • Message not available
    • Re: qsort descending order, Richard Bos
      • Re: qsort descending order, Richard Tobin
  • Re: qsort descending order, CBFalconer
• executing shell commands from c?, Kentor
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Ian Collins
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, SM Ryan
    • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: executing shell commands from c?, CBFalconer
      • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Kentor
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: executing shell commands from c?, muntyan
• void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
  • Re: void * vs char *, pete
    • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
  • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
    • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Flash Gordon
      • Re: void * vs char *, Flash Gordon
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: void * vs char *, Al Balmer
      • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * vs char *, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Jack Klein
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * vs char *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: void * vs char *, Ian Collins
      • Re: void * vs char *, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: void * vs char *, ¬a\\/b
      • Re: void * vs char *, pete
      • Re: void * vs char *, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * vs char *, blufox
  • Re: void * vs char *, Richard Tobin
• source code, zorba
  • Re: source code, Keith Thompson
  • Re: source code, napi
    • Re: source code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: source code, llothar
      • Re: source code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: source code, Roberto Waltman
• char array initialization, FlorinBr
  • Re: char array initialization, Old Wolf
    • Re: char array initialization, FlorinBr
• Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
  • Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system, Harald van Dijk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system, Old Wolf
    • Re: How to represent the biggest number in a system, Ian Collins
• Little problem with a delirant program, Army1987
  • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Army1987
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Clever Monkey
    • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Old Wolf
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, pete
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Army1987
  • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Army1987
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, CBFalconer
      • Re: Little problem with a delirant program, Army1987
• Infinite loop, dmoran21@xxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Infinite loop, dmoran21@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Infinite loop, dmoran21@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Infinite loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Infinite loop, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Infinite loop, Mark L Pappin
      • Re: Infinite loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Infinite loop, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Infinite loop, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Infinite loop, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Infinite loop, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Infinite loop, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Infinite loop, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Infinite loop, CBFalconer
      • Re: Infinite loop, Old Wolf
      • Re: Infinite loop [OT], Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Infinite loop [OT], user923005
      • Re: Infinite loop [OT], Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Infinite loop, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Infinite loop, Chris Johnson
  • Re: Infinite loop, santosh
  • Re: Infinite loop, Thad Smith
    • Re: Infinite loop, Norm Mann
      • Re: Infinite loop, Thad Smith
      • Re: Infinite loop, Norm Mann
  • Re: Infinite loop, Old Wolf
  • Re: Infinite loop, Tobias Rischer
    • Re: Infinite loop, Chris Johnson
  • Re: Infinite loop, user923005
    • Re: Infinite loop, user923005
      • Re: Infinite loop, user923005
    • Re: Infinite loop, Army1987
• Re: How the stack grows, Dave Thompson
• ANSI -> K&R ?, llothar
  • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Tim Prince
  • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Ian Collins
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, llothar
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, jaysome
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Clever Monkey
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Ian Collins
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, llothar
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Ian Collins
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, llothar
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Ian Collins
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, llothar
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Tim Prince
      • Re: ANSI -> K&R ?, Randy Howard
• functions' pointer, gio
  • Re: functions' pointer, Flash Gordon
• K&R -> ANSI?, Zach
  • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, Zach
      • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, Zach
  • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, santosh
    • Re: K&R -> ANSI?, Thomas Dickey
• How to set a double pointer as input argument, Plissken.s@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument, santosh
  • Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument, Bill Pursell
    • Re: How to set a double pointer as input argument, Nick Keighley
• confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, william
  • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, william
    • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Chris Dollin
    • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Keith Thompson
    • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, anilnf
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Flash Gordon
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, william
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, CBFalconer
  • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, santosh
    • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Joe Wright
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Joe Wright
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Joe Wright
      • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, william
  • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Chris Dollin
  • Re: confusion when comparing char * with a string literal, Keith Thompson
• undefined and unspecified behavior, Rajesh S R
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Barry Schwarz
  • OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, santosh
    • Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, CBFalconer
    • Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Default User
      • Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, CBFalconer
      • Re: OT - Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Default User
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, christian.bau
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Keith Thompson
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Thad Smith
    • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: undefined and unspecified behavior, Eric Sosman
• From vasanth, vasanthvn
  • Re: From vasanth, Eric Sosman
  • Re: From vasanth, Mike Wahler
  • Re: From vasanth, santosh
    • Re: From vasanth, Default User
      • Re: From vasanth, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: From vasanth, CBFalconer
      • Re: From vasanth, Eric Sosman
      • Re: From vasanth, Default User
  • Re: From vasanth, pete
    • Re: From vasanth, August Karlstrom
      • Re: From vasanth, pete
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • From vasanth, vasanthvn
    • Re: From vasanth, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: From vasanth, Keith Thompson
    • Re: From vasanth, Nick Keighley
• Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, user923005
  • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, arnuld
    • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, santosh
      • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, arnuld
  • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, Joe Wright
    • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, Old Wolf
      • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Steve Summit C Notes {Anticipating the next one}, user923005
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5, arnuld
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5, user923005
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5, Jason Curl
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5, arnuld
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 5, Thad Smith
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, arnuld
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, user923005
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, G . Frege
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, santosh
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise 4, Thad Smith
• Steve Summit C notes , exercise, arnuld
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, arnuld
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Thad Smith
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Jason Curl
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, user923005
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Jason Curl
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Jason Curl
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Thad Smith
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Gregor H .
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Gregor H .
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Gregor H .
  • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, santosh
    • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, arnuld
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Default User
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, CBFalconer
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Default User
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, arnuld
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, arnuld
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: Steve Summit C notes , exercise, Richard Heathfield
• explicit casts, rCs
  • Re: explicit casts, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: explicit casts, Richard Tobin
  • Re: explicit casts, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: explicit casts, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: explicit casts, Thad Smith
  • Re: explicit casts, Martin Ambuhl
• Convert GMT to Local Time, ZR
  • Re: Convert GMT to Local Time, Dave Vandervies
    • Re: Convert GMT to Local Time, ZR
• Symbolic computation with the language c : The Derivative step by step., xhunga
• Unit Testing With Function Mocking, gamename
  • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Ian Collins
    • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Jack Klein
      • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Ian Collins
      • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, goose
      • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, gamename
      • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Ian Collins
      • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, gamename
  • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, Thad Smith
    • Re: Unit Testing With Function Mocking, gamename
• HELP Please - Convert binary number to string, Todd_Goselin
  • Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string, Default User
  • Re: HELP Please - Convert binary number to string, J. J. Farrell
• enums & ints, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: enums & ints, Walter Roberson
    • Re: enums & ints, Roberto Waltman
      • Re: enums & ints, Victor Eijkhout
      • Re: enums & ints, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: enums & ints, Thad Smith
      • Re: enums & ints, Victor Eijkhout
      • Re: enums & ints, Jack Klein
• What is "\r" represent?, Matthew Zhou
  • Re: What is "\r" represent?, Walter Roberson
  • Re: What is "\r" represent?, santosh
  • Re: What is "\r" represent?, Flash Gordon
  • Re: What is "\r" represent?, Default User
    • Re: What is "\r" represent?, jaysome
• how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, VijaKhara
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, Chris Dollin
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, Michael
    • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, user923005
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, christian.bau
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, Richard Harter
  • Re: how to speed up the matrix multiplication in C, Dik T. Winter
• Re: K&R 5-1, Gregor H .
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: K&R 5-1, Gregor H .
• Simple but interesting issue, Mike
  • Re: Simple but interesting issue, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Simple but interesting issue, Mike
      • Re: Simple but interesting issue, Chris Dollin
      • [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue, Eric Sosman
      • Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue, Flash Gordon
      • Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] Re: Simple but interesting issue, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Simple but interesting issue, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Simple but interesting issue, mark_bluemel
• data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Tim Prince
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, ziibrs
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Jack Klein
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, jaysome
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Chris Dollin
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Jack Klein
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Keith Thompson
      • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Ian Collins
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, J. J. Farrell
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, user923005
      • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Dave Vandervies
    • Message not available
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Keith Thompson
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Ian Collins
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: was Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Keith Thompson
  • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: data type of size 64 bits on a 32 bit processor, Jack Klein
• char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc, ziibrs
  • Re: char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc, Chris Dollin
    • Re: char* and different memory moving functions like memcpy etc, ziibrs
• Multiple returns in functions, nergal
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Ian Collins
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Nishu
    • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Vallabha
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Richard Bos
    • Re: Multiple returns in functions, David Mathog
      • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Multiple returns in functions, pete
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Multiple returns in functions, micans
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, William Hughes
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Klarth
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, Clever Monkey
  • Re: Multiple returns in functions, bert
• assembly in c, ghost.rider.zero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: assembly in c, user923005
  • Re: assembly in c, Ian Collins
  • Re: assembly in c, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: assembly in c, CBFalconer
    • Re: assembly in c, Clever Monkey
      • Re: assembly in c, CBFalconer
  • Re: assembly in c, santosh
• associativity of operators, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: associativity of operators, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: associativity of operators, Richard Harter
      • Re: associativity of operators, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: associativity of operators, Richard Harter
      • Re: associativity of operators, christian.bau
      • Re: associativity of operators, CBFalconer
      • Re: associativity of operators, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: associativity of operators, Richard Harter
• what's diffs in the prog?, guoliang
  • Re: what's diffs in the prog?, Nick Keighley
• assig array != struct ?, langog . info
  • Re: assig array != struct ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: assig array != struct ?, langog . info
      • Re: assig array != struct ?, Nick Keighley
• doubt regarding return value of a function, felix
  • Re: doubt regarding return value of a function, Ian Collins
    • Re: doubt regarding return value of a function, felix
      • Re: doubt regarding return value of a function, Ian Collins
  • Re: doubt regarding return value of a function, Chris Dollin
    • Re: doubt regarding return value of a function, felix
• f() + g() * h(), subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: f() + g() * h(), Richard Heathfield
    • Message not available
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Richard Heathfield
  • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
    • Re: f() + g() * h(), Flash Gordon
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
  • Re: f() + g() * h(), Eric Sosman
    • Re: f() + g() * h(), Francine . Neary
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Francine . Neary
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Francine . Neary
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), christian.bau
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Torek
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Mark McIntyre
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Ben Pfaff
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), CBFalconer
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Joe Wright
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Chris Dollin
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), Bill Pursell
      • Re: f() + g() * h(), ais523
  • Re: f() + g() * h(), Kenneth Brody
• y++, ARMAS
  • Re: y++, Richard Bos
    • Re: y++, Chris Dollin
      • Re: y++, Richard Bos
      • Re: y++, Richard Tobin
      • Re: y++, Chris Dollin
  • Re: y++, Mike Wahler
    • Re: y++, Richard Heathfield
• undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: undefined behaviour a[i] = ++i;, christian.bau
• Memory Alignment Problem, iduniq
  • Re: Memory Alignment Problem, Ian Collins
    • Re: Memory Alignment Problem, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Memory Alignment Problem, iduniq
• Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, Serpent
  • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, brent . buescher
    • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, Serpent
      • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, brent . buescher
      • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, brent . buescher
  • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, pete
  • Re: Dynamically-allocated Multi-dimensional Arrays, Chris Torek
• Re: floating-point precision, Ben Pfaff
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: floating-point precision, CBFalconer
  • Re: floating-point precision, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: floating-point precision, Keith Thompson
  • Re: floating-point precision, William Hughes
    • Re: floating-point precision, CBFalconer
      • Re: floating-point precision, Ben Pfaff
• basics of c language, masood
  • Re: basics of c language, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: basics of c language, user923005
    • Re: basics of c language, Flash Gordon
  • Re: basics of c language, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: basics of c language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: basics of c language, masood
    • Re: basics of c language, Nick Keighley
• cool!!!!!!, aviel571
• dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, VijaKhara
  • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Chris Dollin
  • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Nick Keighley
    • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Richard Tobin
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Richard Tobin
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Richard Tobin
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, VijaKhara
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Chris Dollin
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, CBFalconer
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Default User
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Flash Gordon
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Ian Collins
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Old Wolf
    • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Kevin D . Quitt
  • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Joe Wright
    • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, Joe Wright
  • Re: dynamic 2 D array with malloc??, user923005
• MSVC type cast warning, llothar
  • Re: MSVC type cast warning, Chris Dollin
    • Re: MSVC type cast warning, llothar
      • Re: MSVC type cast warning, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: MSVC type cast warning, Flash Gordon
      • Re: MSVC type cast warning, matevzb
      • Re: MSVC type cast warning, Chris Dollin
  • Re: MSVC type cast warning, Eric Sosman
• Shared Library Question, maven22
  • Re: Shared Library Question, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Shared Library Question, maven22
  • Re: Shared Library Question, Kenneth Brody
• File pointer problem, nergal
  • Re: File pointer problem, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: File pointer problem, Eric Sosman
  • Re: File pointer problem, Chris Dollin
    • Re: File pointer problem, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: File pointer problem, Nick Keighley
  • Re: File pointer problem, John Bode
  • Re: File pointer problem, Martin Ambuhl
• Computer Job Vacancy, sumberbisnis
• generate call graph for C on windows-xp, Bernard
  • Re: generate call graph for C on windows-xp, Ivan Vecerina
    • Re: generate call graph for C on windows-xp, Bernard
• C GUIs, bagz
  • Re: C GUIs, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C GUIs, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: C GUIs, jacob navia
      • Re: C GUIs, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C GUIs, Ian Collins
      • Re: C GUIs, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C GUIs, bluejack
      • Re: C GUIs, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: C GUIs, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C GUIs, Ian Collins
  • Re: C GUIs, CBFalconer
    • Re: C GUIs, Chris Dollin
    • Re: C GUIs, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C GUIs, CBFalconer
      • Re: C GUIs, CBFalconer
      • Re: C GUIs, Nelu
  • Re: C GUIs, tehn . yit . chin
    • Re: C GUIs, Nelu
      • Re: C GUIs, tehn . yit . chin
• Are static functions better optimized by compilers?, llothar
  • Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?, Chris Torek
  • Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?, websnarf
  • Re: Are static functions better optimized by compilers?, Eric Sosman
• regarding #define, venkat
  • Re: regarding #define, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: regarding #define, Sheth Raxit
  • Re: regarding #define, Sheth Raxit
  • Re: regarding #define, Flash Gordon
• cable internet inquiry, jassica
• web designing solution, jassica
• strtok, Zack
  • Re: strtok, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: strtok, Zack
      • Re: strtok, Nelu
      • Re: strtok, CBFalconer
      • Re: strtok, Zack
      • Re: strtok, CBFalconer
      • Re: strtok, Zack
  • Re: strtok, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: strtok, pete
• Re: write a c programme, Walter Roberson
  • Re: write a c programme, Richard Bos
• Re: ???????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????, Mark McIntyre
• Aliasing rules - int and long, Old Wolf
  • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, softwindow
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Ian Collins
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Aliasing rules - int and long, christian.bau
• Unions Redux, Old Wolf
  • Re: Unions Redux, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Unions Redux, Pierre Asselin
  • Re: Unions Redux, Jack Klein
    • Re: Unions Redux, Old Wolf
    • Re: Unions Redux, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Jack Klein
      • Re: Unions Redux, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Unions Redux, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Old Wolf
      • Re: Unions Redux, muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Unions Redux, muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Old Wolf
      • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Unions Redux, muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
    • Re: Unions Redux, CBFalconer
      • Re: Unions Redux, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
  • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
    • Re: Unions Redux, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Unions Redux, Robert Gamble
      • Re: Unions Redux, Yevgen Muntyan
• Function call with wrong number of parameters, arne
  • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
    • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, David Wade
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, CBFalconer
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
    • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Function call with wrong number of parameters, William Hughes
• Correct way to cast, Joe
  • Re: Correct way to cast, Ian Collins
  • Re: Correct way to cast, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Correct way to cast, CBFalconer
  • Re: Correct way to cast, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Correct way to cast, christian.bau
  • Re: Correct way to cast, CBFalconer
  • Re: Correct way to cast, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Correct way to cast, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Correct way to cast, Dave Vandervies
• C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
    • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Bos
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Bos
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, CBFalconer
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Eric Sosman
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, CBFalconer
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Dave Vandervies
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, CBFalconer
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Steve Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Steve Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Steve Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, CBFalconer
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Bos
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Richard Bos
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Jack Klein
    • Re: C89, size_t, and long, Yevgen Muntyan
• printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Yevgen Muntyan
    • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Eric Sosman
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Eric Sosman
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Eric Sosman
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, CBFalconer
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Keith Thompson
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, CBFalconer
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Flash Gordon
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Eric Sosman
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Keith Thompson
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Flash Gordon
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, CBFalconer
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Keith Thompson
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Eric Sosman
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, pete
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Joe Wright
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, pete
    • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, CBFalconer
      • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: printf("%d", INT_MAX);, Jack Klein
• C In Your Brain Quick answer, oorga . power
  • Re: C In Your Brain Quick answer, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: C In Your Brain Quick answer, Kenneth Brody
• ANDing char and int data items, Rahul
  • Re: ANDing char and int data items, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: ANDing char and int data items, Eric Sosman
  • Re: ANDing char and int data items, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: ANDing char and int data items, Joe
• c lan, amazing
  • Re: c lan, Chris Dollin
  • Re: c lan, Joe Wright
    • Re: c lan, Kenneth Brody
• modifying the strings pointed to by argv, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Bryan
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Tobin
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Default User
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, J. J. Farrell
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Racaille
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Racaille
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, CBFalconer
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Default User
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, CBFalconer
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, matevzb
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Richard Bos
  • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Cong Wang
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Cong Wang
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, CBFalconer
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, CBFalconer
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Keith Thompson
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Racaille
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, CBFalconer
  • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
    • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Chris Torek
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Francine . Neary
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Chris Torek
      • Re: modifying the strings pointed to by argv, Stephen Sprunk
• meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, arnuld
  • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Chris Dollin
  • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, santosh
      • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Old Wolf
      • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: meaning of "empty pair" of parenthesis ?, Mark McIntyre
• Why the address of array equals array., 浩澄
  • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Chris Dollin
  • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Matthew Zhou
    • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Chris Dollin
    • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Rahul
      • Re: Why the address of array equals array., Chris Dollin
      • Re: Why the address of array equals array., 浩澄
  • Re: Why the address of array equals array., John Bode
• What is C suitable for nowadays?, Matthew Zhou
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Florian Weingarten
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Matthew Zhou
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, santosh
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Matthew Zhou
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, arnuld
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Default User
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Nick Keighley
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, bluejack
    • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, Matthew Zhou
  • Re: What is C suitable for nowadays?, August Karlstrom
• type of argc, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: type of argc, Eric Sosman
• char vs. signed or unsigned char, At_sea_with_C
  • Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char, Florian Weingarten
    • Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char, Chris Dollin
  • Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char, Nick Keighley
    • Re: char vs. signed or unsigned char, Malcolm McLean
• strchr declaration, ts
  • Re: strchr declaration, Chris Dollin
  • Re: strchr declaration, Florian Weingarten
• variable after label, cmk128
  • Re: variable after label, cmk128
    • Re: variable after label, Chris Dollin
    • Re: variable after label, santosh
      • Re: variable after label, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: variable after label, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: variable after label, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: variable after label, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: variable after label, Keith Thompson
      • Re: variable after label, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: variable after label, Chris Torek
  • Re: variable after label, Sheth Raxit
• swapping pointers returned by malloc, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: swapping pointers returned by malloc, santosh
• sort the array of struct based on the data members ??, Santosh Nayak
  • Re: sort the array of struct based on the data members ??, Ian Collins
  • Re: sort the array of struct based on the data members ??, santosh
• C99 standard anybody has?, Rahul
  • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Jack Klein
    • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Rahul
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Ian Collins
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, santosh
  • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, CBFalconer
    • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Old Wolf
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, CBFalconer
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, lawrence . jones
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Nelu
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Nelu
      • Re: C99 standard anybody has?, Randy Howard
• Bitwise shift help please?, knservis
  • Re: Bitwise shift help please?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Bitwise shift help please?, Farmer
  • Re: Bitwise shift help please?, Rahul
    • Re: Bitwise shift help please?, santosh
  • Re: Bitwise shift help please?, Eric Sosman
• Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work, majdaz
  • Re: Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: Embedded SW Account Manager looking for work, goose
• union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Keith Thompson
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Keith Thompson
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Keith Thompson
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Jack Klein
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Chris Torek
    • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Old Wolf
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Old Wolf
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Old Wolf
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Jack Klein
      • Re: union {unsigned char u[10]; ...}, Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Accessing web with a C program, Neo
  • Re: Accessing web with a C program, santosh
    • Re: Accessing web with a C program, Neo
    • Re: Accessing web with a C program, Neo
• what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive, santosh
  • Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: what is the prupose of the __USE_GNU preprocessor directive, Default User
• Allah, Happy Man
  • Re: Allah, SM Ryan
  • Re: Allah, Farmer
    • Re: Allah, Happy Man
      • Re: Allah, Farmer
      • Re: Allah, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Allah, Malcolm McLean
• operations with double integers, Alexander Stoyakin
  • Re: operations with double integers, santosh
    • Re: operations with double integers, Keith Thompson
      • Re: operations with double integers, santosh
  • Re: operations with double integers, user923005
  • Re: operations with double integers, christian.bau
  • Re: operations with double integers, Ernie Wright
• K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", Papastefanos Serafeim
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", Rajesh S R
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", p_cricket_guy
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.8 (exercise 2.4) "squeeze", Barry Schwarz
• char a[0] ;, Harold Weissman
  • Re: char a[0] ;, santosh
    • Re: char a[0] ;, Old Wolf
      • Re: char a[0] ;, santosh
  • Re: char a[0] ;, Ben Pfaff
• how to surround a constant with quotes?, .rhavin grobert
  • Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?, bytebro
  • Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?, santosh
    • Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?, Old Wolf
  • Re: how to surround a constant with quotes?, pete
• Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, richard . wm . jones
  • Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, Chris Torek
    • Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, richard . wm . jones
      • Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, Tweedale
      • Re: Original authors and licensing of cdecl / c++decl, richard . wm . jones
• K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), santosh
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), santosh
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), Default User
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), santosh
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), Coos Haak
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), Barry Schwarz
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions (exercise), santosh
• UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Chris Torek
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Jack Klein
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, pete
    • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, pete
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, pete
      • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, pete
  • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: UINT_MAX == INT_MAX possible?, Yevgen Muntyan
• Why is C compiler stubborn ?, alertjean
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Old Wolf
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, santosh
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, goose
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, pete
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, pete
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Charlton Wilbur
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, pete
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, santosh
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, pete
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, pete
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Chris Dollin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Dave Vandervies
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, santosh
    • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, santosh
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, bytebro
  • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Why is C compiler stubborn ?, Lew Pitcher
• K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, Ian Collins
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, Chris Dollin
      • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, santosh
  • Re: K&R2 section 2.7 type conversions, santosh
• Good refresher site, gjrw68
  • Re: Good refresher site, bluejack
    • Re: Good refresher site, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Good refresher site, bluejack
      • Re: Good refresher site, Andrew Poelstra
      • Re: Good refresher site, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Good refresher site, bluejack
      • Re: Good refresher site, santosh
      • Re: Good refresher site, bluejack
      • Re: Good refresher site, Zhou Yan
      • Re: Good refresher site, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Good refresher site, santosh
• NOP pointer, TefJlives
  • Re: NOP pointer, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: NOP pointer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: NOP pointer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: NOP pointer, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: NOP pointer, CBFalconer
    • Re: NOP pointer, TefJlives
      • Re: NOP pointer, Keith Thompson
      • Re: NOP pointer, santosh
      • Re: NOP pointer, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: NOP pointer, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: NOP pointer, Richard Bos
• Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB, william
  • Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB, william
  • Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB, santosh
  • Re: Segmentation Fault Error reported by GDB, CBFalconer
• JavaScript Popup Windows Generation and Testing Tutorials, Software Engineer
• Proper fgets, uidzer0
  • Re: Proper fgets, user923005
    • Re: Proper fgets, uidzer0
      • Re: Proper fgets, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Proper fgets, santosh
    • Re: Proper fgets, uidzer0
    • Re: Proper fgets, Old Wolf
    • Re: Proper fgets, Chris Torek
  • Re: Proper fgets, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Proper fgets, CBFalconer
• Practical uses of XOR, cman
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Richard Bos
    • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Coos Haak
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Richard Bos
    • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Roberto Waltman
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, pete
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Roberto Waltman
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, santosh
    • Re: Practical uses of XOR, CBFalconer
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, user923005
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, mensanator@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Walter Roberson
    • Re: Practical uses of XOR, Harald van Dijk
• Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Rajesh S R
  • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Eric Sosman
    • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Rajesh S R
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Rajesh S R
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., mark_bluemel
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Rajesh S R
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Thad Smith
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Richard Tobin
  • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
    • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., micans
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Richard Tobin
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., micans
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., micans
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Richard Tobin
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., micans
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Richard Bos
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., Richard Bos
      • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., William Hughes
  • Re: Violation of Conversion rule of C99., user923005
• Re: Truth Seeker, Erik de Castro Lopo
  • Re: Truth Seeker, CBFalconer
    • [still OT] Re: Truth Seeker, goose
      • Re: Truth Seeker, Happy Man
      • Re: Truth Seeker, SM Ryan
• Capture USB Webcam Images using C, Speed
  • Re: Capture USB Webcam Images using C, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Capture USB Webcam Images using C, santosh
• size of pointers, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: size of pointers, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
    • Re: size of pointers, santosh
      • Re: size of pointers, santosh
  • Re: size of pointers, Flash Gordon
  • Re: size of pointers, Keith Thompson
    • Re: size of pointers, Chris Torek
      • Re: size of pointers, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: size of pointers, Flash Gordon
      • Re: size of pointers, Joe Wright
      • Re: size of pointers, santosh
      • Re: size of pointers, Chris Torek
• Re: Who are Darwin's Outcasts?, Richard Bos
  • Re: Who are Darwin's Outcasts?, Ian Collins
• beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, bluejack
    • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, filehellomarch
      • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, bluejack
    • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, Nick Keighley
      • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, bluejack
      • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, santosh
  • Re: beginner's question on pointer arithmetic, santosh
• Looking for C code for SVD, A.E lover
  • Re: Looking for C code for SVD, Nelu
  • Re: Looking for C code for SVD, user923005
• Good Design in C: Encapsulation, bluejack
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, bluejack
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, bluejack
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, William Ahern
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, William Ahern
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, William Hughes
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, bluejack
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, William Hughes
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, William Hughes
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, David Tiktin
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, CBFalconer
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Adrian Hawryluk
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Roland Pibinger
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Ian Collins
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Good Design in C: Encapsulation, CBFalconer
• beginning algorithms, arnuld
  • Re: beginning algorithms, santosh
    • Re: beginning algorithms, arnuld
      • OT - Re: beginning algorithms, santosh
• Floating point precision, artifact . one
  • Re: Floating point precision, santosh
  • Re: Floating point precision, Coos Haak
  • Re: Floating point precision, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Floating point precision, artifact . one
  • Re: Floating point precision, Martin Ambuhl
• any views on this algorithms book, arnuld
  • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Francine . Neary
    • Re: any views on this algorithms book, arnuld
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Francine . Neary
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, CBFalconer
  • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Keith Thompson
    • Re: any views on this algorithms book, santosh
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, arnuld
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: any views on this algorithms book, arnuld
      • Re: any views on this algorithms book, Keith Thompson
• please do this for me, amey1.kamat@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: please do this for me, santosh
  • Re: please do this for me, Barry
    • Re: please do this for me, Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: please do this for me, christian.bau
  • Re: please do this for me, Christopher Benson-Manica
• K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", santosh
    • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", santosh
      • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", santosh
      • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", santosh
  • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.19 "reversing a character array", Barry Schwarz
• value context, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: value context, santosh
  • Re: value context, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: value context, Keith Thompson
• K&R2 exercise 1.17 solution, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.17 solution, santosh
    • Re: K&R2 exercise 1.17 solution, Flash Gordon
• When to use alternative argument layout?, Francine . Neary
  • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Ian Collins
  • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Al Balmer
      • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Al Balmer
  • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, santosh
    • Re: When to use alternative argument layout?, Francine . Neary
• Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, CBFalconer
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, CBFalconer
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Nelu
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Mark McIntyre
      • Meaning of "region" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Meaning of "region" (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, CBFalconer
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Flash Gordon
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Gregor H .
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Gregor H .
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), CBFalconer
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Designations for various C standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating stringrepresents integer, CBFalconer
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, pete
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, pete
      • CookBook/Matrix errata (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: CookBook/Matrix errata (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, pete
      • Various C standards/documents (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Various C standards/documents (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Keith Thompson
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Stephen Sprunk
      • Man pages and standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Man pages and standards (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, CBFalconer
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Richard Heathfield
      • bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: bzip2 (was months ago: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, CBFalconer
  • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Requesting advice how to clean up C code for validating string represents integer, Flash Gordon
• Allocating large blocks, Francine . Neary
  • Re: Allocating large blocks, Ian Collins
  • Re: Allocating large blocks, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Allocating large blocks, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Allocating large blocks, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Allocating large blocks, SM Ryan
  • Re: Allocating large blocks, christian.bau
    • Re: Allocating large blocks, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Allocating large blocks, Keith Thompson
• How to initialize a 2D static array?, Vol
  • Re: How to initialize a 2D static array?, Keith Thompson
• Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Randy Howard
  • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, CBFalconer
    • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Randy Howard
      • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, ¬a\\/b
  • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, santosh
    • Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, CBFalconer
      • OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, santosh
      • Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Nelu
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Nelu
      • Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, santosh
      • Re: OT - Re: Installation Charge Free Cable Internet, Randy Howard
• Re: how to become advance c programmer, Randy Howard
  • Re: how to become advance c programmer, Kelsey Bjarnason
    • Re: how to become advance c programmer, santosh
      • Re: how to become advance c programmer, Kelsey Bjarnason
    • Re: how to become advance c programmer, Randy Howard
• Re: Convert output from MD5 to printable ascii, Randy Howard
• Symbolic computation : the derivative of a quotient., xhunga
• enum question., At_sea_with_C
  • Re: enum question., Eric Sosman
  • Re: enum question., attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: enum question., Ian Collins
  • Re: enum question., CBFalconer
    • Re: enum question., Ian Collins
      • Re: enum question., CBFalconer
      • Re: enum question., Ian Collins
      • Re: enum question., santosh
      • Re: enum question., CBFalconer
      • Re: enum question., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: enum question., Ian Collins
    • Re: enum question., Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: enum question., santosh
• which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), arnuld
  • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), santosh
    • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), arnuld
      • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), Harald van Dijk
  • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), arnuld
      • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 (was: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 ?, arnuld
      • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 ?, arnuld
      • Re: which is better to follow C89 or C99 ?, santosh
• integer multiplication, Pesso
  • Re: integer multiplication, santosh
    • Re: integer multiplication, santosh
  • Re: integer multiplication, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: integer multiplication, Keith Thompson
      • Re: integer multiplication, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: integer multiplication, Nelu
      • Re: integer multiplication, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: integer multiplication, santosh
      • Re: integer multiplication, CBFalconer
      • Re: integer multiplication, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: integer multiplication, CBFalconer
      • Re: integer multiplication, user923005
      • Re: integer multiplication, user923005
      • Re: integer multiplication, CBFalconer
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, CBFalconer
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Old Wolf
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Old Wolf
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Nelu
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Nelu
      • Re: integer multiplication, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: integer multiplication, Nelu
• structure assignment vs memcpy, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: structure assignment vs memcpy, santosh
  • Re: structure assignment vs memcpy, Richard Tobin
• #define vs const declaration, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
    • Re: #define vs const declaration, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Bill Pursell
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, CBFalconer
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, Ian Collins
      • Re: #define vs const declaration, websnarf
  • Re: #define vs const declaration, christian.bau
    • Re: #define vs const declaration, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
    • Re: #define vs const declaration, santosh
  • Re: #define vs const declaration, Keith Thompson
  • Re: #define vs const declaration, Ben Pfaff
• using strtok, Mr John FO Evans
  • Re: using strtok, matevzb
    • Re: using strtok, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: using strtok, CBFalconer
      • Re: using strtok, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: using strtok, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: using strtok, Richard Tobin
      • Re: using strtok, Flash Gordon
      • Re: using strtok, matevzb
  • Re: using strtok, santosh
    • Re: using strtok, pete
  • Re: using strtok, CBFalconer
  • Re: using strtok, Richard Bos
    • Re: using strtok, Joe Wright
      • Re: using strtok, Al Balmer
• Rvalue of struct type, SRR
  • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Rvalue of struct type, SRR
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Rvalue of struct type, SRR
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Rajesh S R
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Rajesh S R
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, CBFalconer
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Old Wolf
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Yevgen Muntyan
    • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Chris Torek
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Rajesh S R
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Chris Torek
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Rajesh S R
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Rajesh S R
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, santosh
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, santosh
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, santosh
      • Re: Rvalue of struct type, Beej Jorgensen
• simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, aiooua
  • Re: simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, Keith Thompson
  • Re: simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, santosh
    • Re: simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, aiooua
  • Re: simple assignment of structs vs. memcpy, Malcolm McLean
• ANSI C syntax ?, bz800k
  • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
    • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, SRR
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
  • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Zhou
    • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, SRR
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Zhou Yan
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Rajesh S R
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Zhou Yan
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Joe Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Old Wolf
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Nelu
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Joe Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Al Balmer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Al Balmer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Joe Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Bob Martin
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Dollin
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Al Balmer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Nelu
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Default User
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Nelu
      • Re: ANSI English :-) syntax ?, Nelu
      • Re: ANSI English :-) syntax ?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Joe Wright
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, santosh
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, bz800k
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
      • Re: ANSI C syntax ?, Chris Hills
• K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, santosh
    • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, santosh
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.9 character arrays, santosh
• printf() and write(), ericunfuk
  • Re: printf() and write(), Ian Collins
  • Re: printf() and write(), Nelu
  • Re: printf() and write(), Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: printf() and write(), santosh
  • Re: printf() and write(), Mark McIntyre
    • Re: printf() and write(), Joachim Schmitz
• Cruise control with distance control, ACC
  • Re: Cruise control with distance control, Thad Smith
• skipping a structure member while initializing, Mik0b0
  • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Mik0b0
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Keith Thompson
  • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Matt Kowalczyk
    • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Matt Kowalczyk
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Rajesh S R
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Chris Torek
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, Rajesh S R
    • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, SRR
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, santosh
      • Re: skipping a structure member while initializing, CBFalconer
• c compilation, ravitejachn
  • Re: c compilation, santosh
  • Re: c compilation, Malcolm McLean
    • OT - Re: c compilation, santosh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • c compilation, ravitejachn
    • Re: c compilation, Richard Tobin
    • Re: c compilation, Richard Bos
• Symbolic computation : the derivative of a product., xhunga
  • Re: Symbolic computation : the derivative of a product., user923005
  • Re: Symbolic computation : the derivative of a product., user923005
    • Re: Symbolic computation : the derivative of a product., xhunga
• Timing function in C, ericunfuk
  • Re: Timing function in C, user923005
• Any simple way to write this function, poison . summer
  • Re: Any simple way to write this function, Mike Wahler
  • Re: Any simple way to write this function, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Any simple way to write this function, Joe Wright
  • Re: Any simple way to write this function, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Any simple way to write this function, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Any simple way to write this function, CBFalconer
• Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Ron
  • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Ron
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Under what circumstances will this use of strncpy fail?, Eric Sosman
• How to turn 6 bucks into $60,000.00, Spydie
• Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Francine . Neary
  • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Nelu
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, CBFalconer
  • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Old Wolf
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Francine . Neary
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Old Wolf
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Robert Gamble
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, CBFalconer
  • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, CBFalconer
  • Re: Inconsistent argument order in stdlib functions, SM Ryan
• finding max value of size_t, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: finding max value of size_t, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: finding max value of size_t, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Chris Dollin
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, shadowman
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, shadowman
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, John Bode
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, santosh
    • Re: finding max value of size_t, spacecriter \(Bill C\)
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, spacecriter \(Bill C\)
    • Re: finding max value of size_t, Keith Thompson
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Keith Thompson
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Keith Thompson
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Nelu
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: finding max value of size_t, santosh
• overflow of unsigned int, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: overflow of unsigned int, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: overflow of unsigned int, Eric Sosman
  • Re: overflow of unsigned int, santosh
• getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Spitfire
  • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Stefan Pendl
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Spitfire
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Keith Thompson
      • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Spitfire
      • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Keith Thompson
      • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, CBFalconer
  • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Spitfire
  • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, user923005
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, christian.bau
    • Re: getting elapsed time with accuracy in milliseconds, Spitfire
• Stroustrup section 1.5.4, word counting, arnuld
  • Re: Stroustrup section 1.5.4, word counting, santosh
    • Re: Stroustrup section 1.5.4, word counting, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Stroustrup section 1.5.4, word counting, Keith Thompson
• enum within structure??, sethukr@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: enum within structure??, Ian Collins
  • Re: enum within structure??, bluejack
  • Re: enum within structure??, santosh
  • Re: enum within structure??, sethukr@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: enum within structure??, Servé Laurijssen
    • Re: enum within structure??, Keith Thompson
• a simple query, newbai
  • Re: a simple query, Ian Collins
  • Re: a simple query, santosh
  • Re: a simple query, Chris Dollin
  • Re: a simple query, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: a simple query, CBFalconer
    • Re: a simple query, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: a simple query, Keith Thompson
      • Re: a simple query, CBFalconer
      • Re: a simple query, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: a simple query, Keith Thompson
      • Re: a simple query, CBFalconer
      • Re: a simple query, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: a simple query, CBFalconer
      • Re: a simple query, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: a simple query, Richard Bos
  • Re: a simple query, websnarf
    • Re: a simple query, Keith Thompson
      • Re: a simple query, Flash Gordon
• incrementing void *, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: incrementing void *, Ian Collins
    • Re: incrementing void *, P.J. Plauger
      • Re: incrementing void *, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
      • Re: incrementing void *, santosh
      • Re: incrementing void *, Ian Collins
      • Re: incrementing void *, santosh
      • Re: incrementing void *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: incrementing void *, Servé Laurijssen
      • Re: incrementing void *, Richard Tobin
      • Re: incrementing void *, Richard Tobin
      • Re: incrementing void *, Ian Collins
      • Re: incrementing void *, P.J. Plauger
      • Re: incrementing void *, Old Wolf
  • Re: incrementing void *, santosh
    • Re: incrementing void *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: incrementing void *, santosh
      • Re: incrementing void *, ais523
  • Re: incrementing void *, Eric Sosman
  • Re: incrementing void *, AdrianH
    • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: incrementing void *, spacecriter \(Bill C\)
    • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, spacecriter \(Bill C\)
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, pete
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, pete
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, pete
      • Re: incrementing void *, CBFalconer
      • Re: incrementing void *, Chris Dollin
      • Re: incrementing void *, santosh
      • Re: incrementing void *, Chris Dollin
      • Re: incrementing void *, Francine . Neary
      • Re: incrementing void *, CBFalconer
      • Re: incrementing void *, Richard Tobin
      • Re: incrementing void *, Clark Cox
      • Re: incrementing void *, R Pradeep Chandran
      • Re: incrementing void *, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: incrementing void *, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: incrementing void *, Richard
      • Re: incrementing void *, CBFalconer
  • Re: incrementing void *, pete
  • Re: incrementing void *, websnarf
    • Re: incrementing void *, Keith Thompson
  • Re: incrementing void *, Miojo Lamen
    • Re: incrementing void *, Keith Thompson
  • Re: incrementing void *, Richard Heathfield
• Real Life Unions, bluejack
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Beej Jorgensen
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Ian Collins
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Ernie Wright
  • Re: Real Life Unions, William Ahern
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Real Life Unions, William Ahern
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Real Life Unions, William Ahern
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Old Wolf
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • [meta] OT-vs-T (was Re: Real Life Unions), Kenneth Brody
      • Re: [meta] OT-vs-T (was Re: Real Life Unions), Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Old Wolf
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, bluejack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Default User
      • Re: Real Life Unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Richard Bos
    • Re: Real Life Unions, bluejack
      • Re: Real Life Unions, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Real Life Unions, SM Ryan
      • Re: Real Life Unions, William Ahern
  • Re: Real Life Unions, micans
  • Re: Real Life Unions, Mark McIntyre
• C-Preprocessor Experts wanted..., Klaus Siegesleitner
  • Re: C-Preprocessor Experts wanted..., Dave Hansen
• Help me, Nikhil Bokare
  • Re: Help me, santosh
  • Re: Help me, user923005
  • Re: Help me, Christopher Benson-Manica
    • Re: Help me, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Help me, Beej Jorgensen
    • Re: Help me, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Help me, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: Help me, santosh
  • Re: Help me, Randy Howard
• Pointer & Malloc Help Appreciated (sorry if repost), Kevin
  • Re: Pointer & Malloc Help Appreciated (sorry if repost), santosh
• organization of struct elements in the memory., aiooua
  • Re: organization of struct elements in the memory., Richard Bos
  • Re: organization of struct elements in the memory., santosh
    • Re: organization of struct elements in the memory., aiooua
• ctime double double check, aisling . cronin
  • Re: ctime double double check, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: ctime double double check, Eric Sosman
    • Re: ctime double double check, aisling . cronin
      • Re: ctime double double check, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: ctime double double check, Flash Gordon
      • Re: ctime double double check, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ctime double double check, aisling . cronin
      • Re: ctime double double check, Nelu
      • Re: ctime double double check, Keith Thompson
  • Re: ctime double double check, Richard Bos
  • Re: ctime double double check, R Pradeep Chandran
• Division precision issue, Artemio
  • Re: Division precision issue, Tim Prince
    • Re: Division precision issue, Artemio
      • Re: Division precision issue, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Division precision issue, santosh
      • Re: Division precision issue, Artemio
      • Re: Division precision issue, Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Division precision issue, Mike Wahler
    • Re: Division precision issue, Artemio
      • Re: Division precision issue, CBFalconer
  • Re: Division precision issue, Thad Smith
• K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, santosh
    • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, santosh
    • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, CBFalconer
    • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, Richard
      • Re: K&R2, section 1.5.3, exercise 1.8, santosh
• purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, arnuld
  • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, Flash Gordon
    • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, arnuld
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, arnuld
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, santosh
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, jaysome
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, santosh
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, jaysome
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, Default User
  • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, user923005
  • Re: purchasing C FAQs book is a good idea ?, jaysome
• How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Zhou Yan
  • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Daniel
    • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Zhou Yan
    • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Zhou Yan
      • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Zhou Yan
      • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Adrian Hawryluk
      • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Zhou
  • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, mhagerty
  • Re: How to define a pointer to multiple-subscripted arrays, Thad Smith
• Will this leak memory?, Joakim Hove
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, santosh
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, Franchie
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, Richard Bos
    • Re: Will this leak memory?, Joakim Hove
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, Roland Pibinger
    • Re: Will this leak memory?, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Will this leak memory?, Bill Pursell
• Syntax error on #define, Anshul
  • Re: Syntax error on #define, Anshul
  • Re: Syntax error on #define, santosh
    • Re: Syntax error on #define, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Syntax error on #define, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Syntax error on #define, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Syntax error on #define, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Syntax error on #define, santosh
  • Re: Syntax error on #define, Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Erik de Castro Lopo
  • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, santosh
  • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Mark Babli
    • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, mensanator@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Happy Man
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Nelu
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Dietmar Schindler
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, SM Ryan
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Mark Babli
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, dave. null
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Mark Babli
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Farmer
      • Re: [OT] Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Erik de Castro Lopo
    • Re: Compound Literals, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: Compound Literals, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Compound Literals, CBFalconer
      • Re: Compound Literals, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Re: longjmp, goto, and VLAs, Beej Jorgensen
      • Re: Is Islam Really a Religion of Terror?, Joe Wright
• Comparing char * with string literal, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, bytebro
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Sheth Raxit
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Mike Wahler
  • Re: Comparing char * with string literal, Malcolm McLean
• Access by string name, jz
  • Re: Access by string name, Florian Weingarten
    • Re: Access by string name, HelloLinux
  • Re: Access by string name, Sheth Raxit
    • Re: Access by string name, jz
      • Re: Access by string name, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Access by string name, jaysome
      • Re: Access by string name, Mike Wahler
      • Re: Access by string name, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Access by string name, CBFalconer
    • Re: Access by string name, Florian Weingarten
  • Re: Access by string name, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Access by string name, santosh
      • Re: Access by string name, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Access by string name, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Access by string name, Mark McIntyre
• union, newbai
  • Re: union, Sheth Raxit
  • Re: union, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: union, HelloLinux
    • Re: union, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: union, Doug
      • Re: union, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: union, Doug
  • Re: union, santosh
  • Re: union, Mark McIntyre
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • union, newbai
  • union, newbai
    • Re: union, Keith Thompson
      • Re: union, santosh
• why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, arnuld
  • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Mike Wahler
  • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Ian Collins
    • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, arnuld
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, dwks
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Keith Thompson
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Keith Thompson
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Flash Gordon
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, santosh
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Keith Thompson
      • Re: why (getchar() != EOF) always equal to 1, Mark McIntyre
• how to print the value of EOF?, arnuld
  • Re: how to print the value of EOF?, arnuld
• K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, arnuld
  • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Sheth Raxit
    • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Keith Thompson
  • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Zhou Yan
  • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Keith Thompson
    • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Keith Thompson
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Keith Thompson
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Nick Keighley
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, santosh
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, santosh
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, arnuld
      • Re: K&R2 section 1.5.1 - "getchar" problem, Beej Jorgensen
• array, buuuuuum
  • Re: array, dwks
    • Re: array, Keith Thompson
    • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: array, Flash Gordon
    • Re: array, buuuuuum
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: array, CBFalconer
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: array, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: array, Yevgen Muntyan
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, buuuuuum
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Default User
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Default User
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Default User
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Default User
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Default User
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, buuuuuum
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Thomas.Chang
      • Re: array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: array, Chris Dollin
  • Re: array, SRR
  • Re: array, santosh
    • Re: array, Joe Wright
  • Re: array, Ian Collins
    • Re: array, santosh
      • Re: array, Ian Collins
• symbolic computation in c language !!!, xhunga
  • Re: symbolic computation in c language !!!, user923005
    • Re: symbolic computation in c language !!!, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: symbolic computation in c language !!!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: symbolic computation in c language !!!, xhunga
      • Re: symbolic computation in c language !!!, Jens Thoms T