[OT] Re: Ahead of "main"?
- From: Eric Sosman <esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:23:35 -0400
mdh wrote:
On Apr 29, 2:42 pm, Eric Sosman <esos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I think you are still confusing "declaration" and
"definition." You should declare every function before
trying to call it (modern compilers change "should" to
"must"), but you can define the function wherever you
like.
Maybe I did not articulate that well, but I understand that, thanks.
Eventually this will make sense. Trust me.
How could I not trust anyone who so beautifully intertweaves
Shakespeare with Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy?
Be bloody, bold, and resolute, and never lose
track of your towel!
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Ahead of "main"?
- From: mdh
- Re: Ahead of "main"?
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: Ahead of "main"?
- From: mdh
- Re: Ahead of "main"?
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: Ahead of "main"?
- From: mdh
- Ahead of "main"?
- Prev by Date: Re: gets() is dead
- Next by Date: Re: gets() is dead
- Previous by thread: Re: Ahead of "main"?
- Next by thread: Re: Ahead of "main"?
- Index(es):