Re: bitwise on float
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:10:52 +0000
Keith Thompson said:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Keith Thompson said:[...]
Unless there's yet again something else that I'm missing, I think
that C99 has dropped the idea that type punning can be done without
invoking outright undefined behavior, except for character types and
common initial sequences.
And yet it could be done in C90. And if it can be done by the
ancients, surely it shouldn't be too big a deal for the moderns?
Built any pyramids lately?
Yes. It wasn't easy, but nothing worthwhile ever is. I am glad to report
that it performs fully according to spec - I will never have to buy
another razor blade.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
.
- References:
- bitwise on float
- From: Carramba
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: christian.bau
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: none
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: bitwise on float
- From: Keith Thompson
- bitwise on float
- Prev by Date: Re: bitwise on float
- Next by Date: Memory allocation failure
- Previous by thread: Re: bitwise on float
- Next by thread: Re: bitwise on float
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|