Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- From: "L.G" <leaveye.guo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2007 19:27:50 -0700
On 5 31 , 10 23 , Ian Collins <ian-n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What did you expect?
--
Ian Collins.
Commonly, left shift one bit should fill a zero at the lowest bit.
So, if I shift left some more bits, why not fill corresponding zeros ?
-L.G
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- References:
- About shift one number more than 32.
- From: L.G
- Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- From: Ian Collins
- About shift one number more than 32.
- Prev by Date: Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- Next by Date: Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- Previous by thread: Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- Next by thread: Re: About shift one number more than 32.
- Index(es):
