Re: A good compiler please....

nszabolcs wrote:
Guru Jois wrote:
On May 31, 2:36 pm, Nikhil Bokare <nbok...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can anyone suggest me a good, small, easy to use compiler which
follows ANSI C standards?

I use TurboC for the sole reason that I am quite used to it. It does
not follow some of the ANSI C standards.
see this could be useful to download. I don't know more about this
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/software/lcc/

why lcc? why not gcc?
http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml
or here is a list
http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/portable/c/resources.php#FreeCompilers

is lcc better in some way?


Yes. lcc is smaller, no installation problems, and it is a C compiler,
not a C++ compiler that can also compile C.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A good compiler please....
    ... I use TurboC for the sole reason that I am quite used to it. ... not follow some of the ANSI C standards. ... A good C compiler is gcc, and if you start using lint too, you a lot ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: A good compiler please....
    ... not follow some of the ANSI C standards. ... not a C++ compiler that can also compile C. ... Gcc is the Gnu Compiler Collection. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Whats the output
    ... The 1990 ANSI version which is the same as the 1990 ISO version? ... ANSI C version is wrong because the answer will be compiler dependant. ... The standards SAY that it is compiler dependant. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: A good compiler please....
    ... I use TurboC for the sole reason that I am quite used to it. ... not follow some of the ANSI C standards. ... I think Dev C++ IDE with Cygwincompiler would fit your ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: A good compiler please....
    ... I use TurboC for the sole reason that I am quite used to it. ... not follow some of the ANSI C standards. ... is lcc better in some way? ...
    (comp.lang.c)