Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: "Malcolm McLean" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:05:40 +0100
"Richard Heathfield" <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7oidnecxxeEqReHbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
Malcolm McLean said:What you are saying is that you have a small pension from the British government. What is the chance of the government going bankrupt as you withdraw your pension?
Wrong. A 2GB computer will typically have many more demands placed
upon it than will a 640KB computer, and every camel - no matter how
strong its back - has a last straw.
Governments can go bankrupt, but it causes major social disruption, and so voters normally don't tolerate more than one or two defaults until they either put more money into the kitty or reduce obligations.
Yes. I am currently writing BabyX purely to avoid depending on Motif. Motif is a far better toolkit than I could write, but I don't have it installed on my machine. I can get it, but then that will mean that everyone who wants to play about with my program will have to do the same. So I took the decision to depend just on Xlib, hence BabyX.
But I don't have any problem depending on /good/ code. Do you?
--
Free games and programming goodies.
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Roland Pibinger
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- References:
- Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Chad
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Johan Bengtsson
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Prev by Date: Re: getchar() problem
- Next by Date: Re: Sequence point question
- Previous by thread: Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Next by thread: Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|