Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:39:33 +0100
Malcolm McLean wrote, On 24/06/07 00:52:
"Flash Gordon" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:nrk0l4x0ug.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMalcolm McLean wrote, On 23/06/07 16:22:The details of makefiles are OT, but the reason you can link up a library in minutes whilst it takes me an hour or more is certainly topical, and very interesting.
"Flash Gordon" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
<snip>
Of course, this is going far OT so you will have to go else where to learn how to write makefiles for your system.Nothing OT on the library debate.
<snip long explanation about the pains you had linking to X>
How to use makefiles so that the people you ship the source to don't need to know how to link is OT, and that is what I am suggesting was the better approach. Also the reason it takes you an hour to do what takes me a few minutes is OT. Learning the interface to a library may take a while, but linking to it only takes me minutes.
Either I am brilliant at finding, reading and understanding the documentation and examples or you are terrible at it. Or, I suppose, it could just be that I know how the systems work and how to ask it the right questions and you don't.
Personally I don't think I'm as good as my colleagues do and certainly don't consider myself to be brilliant, but our respective abilities are not topical here.
--
Flash Gordon
.
- References:
- Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Chad
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Johan Bengtsson
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Roland Pibinger
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Prev by Date: Re: reply the answer
- Next by Date: what's this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Next by thread: Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|