Re: reply the answer
- From: jaysome <jaysome@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:39:42 -0700
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:47:41 +0000, Richard Heathfield
<rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CBFalconer said:
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Eric Sosman said:
guthena wrote:
Can we write a C programe with out a semicolon ? printing
HELLOWORLD !
Yes.
I'm curious. I can see the print part easily enough, but how are
you going to handle the return statement? (Email reply welcome if
you don't want to spoil the OP's fun.)
Use C99.
I don't have the patience to wait that long. Nor do I have the
inclination to use ugly features just because they're legal.
So what you're saying is that C1999--I mean C99--was totally useless
(at least in this instance) in your point of view? If so, I tend to
agree.
Windows Vista, and even Windows XP, has a "Rollback driver" option. Is
there anything similar with respect to ISO/ANSI standards in general,
and the ISO/ANSI C99 standard in specific?
I'd be willing to bet that most regulars in this newsgroup wouldn't
hesitate to click on a button labeled "Rollback Standard Version" when
it comes to C.
--
jay
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reply the answer
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: reply the answer
- References:
- reply the answer
- From: guthena
- Re: reply the answer
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: reply the answer
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: reply the answer
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: reply the answer
- From: Richard Heathfield
- reply the answer
- Prev by Date: Re: casts and lvalues
- Next by Date: Re: _Exit() and signal handlers
- Previous by thread: Re: reply the answer
- Next by thread: Re: reply the answer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
