Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:55:13 -0400
jacob navia wrote:
Richard Heathfield wrote:.... snip ...
You have the same bug as last time. No standard-conforming
implementation may define QFLT_EPSILON in the standard header
<float.h>, as I pointed out to you earlier this week.
I have told you thousand times that this can be disabled
by using -ansic.
All extensions are disabled with -ansic, except _stdcall
What has this to do with the C language? I thought lcc-win32
discussions were to be placed on the comp.compilers.lcc newsgroup?
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: Harald van Dijk
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- References:
- Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: jacob navia
- Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Next by Date: Re: Struct assignment
- Previous by thread: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Next by thread: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|