Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: Harald van Dijk <truedfx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:19:40 +0200
CBFalconer wrote:
jacob navia wrote:
Richard Heathfield wrote:... snip ...
You have the same bug as last time. No standard-conforming
implementation may define QFLT_EPSILON in the standard header
<float.h>, as I pointed out to you earlier this week.
I have told you thousand times that this can be disabled
by using -ansic.
All extensions are disabled with -ansic, except _stdcall
What has this to do with the C language? I thought lcc-win32
discussions were to be placed on the comp.compilers.lcc newsgroup?
The fact that QFLT_EPSILON is /not/ defined in a compiler's conforming mode
is not specific to lcc-win32.
.
- References:
- Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- From: CBFalconer
- Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: file shredding
- Next by Date: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Next by thread: Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|