Re: A good compiler
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:14:09 +0000
Chris Hills said:
In article <kr6dnX_p45EAlTDbRVnyvwA@xxxxxx>, Richard Heathfield
<rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
The strcpy function is no more unsafe than any other power tool. Yes,
it requires careful handling, but then so do many functions.
Programming is a difficult game to play well.
This gets us into the discussion about the "secure" library that MS
has pushed into an ISO Technical Report with their so-called safe
functions.....
Er, indeed. But if I wanted someone to design a library of safe
functions for me, Microsoft wouldn't exactly leap to mind as my first
choice.
I wish I could be sure the ISO C committee would be of the same mind.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: A good compiler
- References:
- A good compiler
- From: Ajinkya
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Richard
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: A good compiler
- From: mmcconnell17704
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: A good compiler
- From: jacob navia
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A good compiler
- From: Chris Hills
- A good compiler
- Prev by Date: Re: A good compiler
- Next by Date: Re: Increment operator
- Previous by thread: Re: A good compiler
- Next by thread: Re: A good compiler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|