Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:18:20 +0100
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:51:12 -0700, in comp.lang.c , Keith Thompson
<kst-u@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The actual statement, from Army1987, was:
| What kind of processor do they have? How wide is their size_t?
| I still think that having more than 4GB on a computer with a 32
| bit processor is *very* silly.
In response to my point about having access to _PCs_ with 8+GB memory.
Looking upthread, I don't see any statement that putting more than4BG
on a PC is pointless.
*shrug*. Read it any way you prefer. IMHO someone here is being being
gratuitously pedantic.
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- References:
- Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Andrew Fabbro
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Army1987
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Army1987
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- From: Keith Thompson
- Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- Prev by Date: Re: Preprocessor - can it make conditional decisions
- Next by Date: Re: How to talk to hardware devices in C
- Previous by thread: Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- Next by thread: Re: Big arrays (confusion over FAQ 6.14)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|