Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:21:52 +0000
Kelsey Bjarnason said:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:36:49 +0200, jacob navia wrote:<snip>
Lcc-win32 is the only *C* compiler being developed now.
When did gnu stop working on theirs? Seems that as of July 18, 2007,
they were still actively working on it.
They are not the only ones; Mr Navia's timing is as exquisite as ever.
In comp.programming today, over five hours before Mr Navia's claim that
lcc-win32 is the only C compiler being developed now, a new C compiler
("bgb", I think it's called) was released, with full source code. It
lacks one or two features as yet (the author cites "static" and struct
initialisation), but then he's only been working on it since late
March, so that's understandable.
I haven't had the opportunity to play with it yet, but a (very) quick
perusal of some of the source code suggests that the author seems to
know what he's doing.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- References:
- Specifications for operator overloading
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: Karl Heinze
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: Army1987
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Specifications for operator overloading
- Prev by Date: Re: size_t problems
- Next by Date: Re: size_t problems
- Previous by thread: Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- Next by thread: Re: Specifications for operator overloading
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|