Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:06:47 -0700
Friar Tuck <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 12 Sep 2007 at 23:47, pete wrote:[...]
There is no such thing as "the group website".
Isn't the group website cpac.org? It's in one of the group moderator's
signatures and has lots of C resources. It certainly looks official.
comp.lang.c has no moderator. Perhaps you're thinking of
comp.lang.c.moderate. In any case, cpac.org has nothing to do with C;
it's a political site.
[...]
Was the final conclusion of this thread that Dr Sosman's function[...]
clashes with a common library funcion and should be renamed?
I don't think there was a conclusion. (One could also argue, though
less persuasively, that GNU's getline function should be renamed
because it conflicts with Eric's.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.
- References:
- Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: Friar Tuck
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: Friar Tuck
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: pete
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- From: Friar Tuck
- Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- Prev by Date: Re: typedefing a struct
- Next by Date: Re: typedefing a struct
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- Next by thread: Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|