Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 30 Sep 2007 14:07:01 GMT
In article <1191160111.636593.293410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i was reading this page "Optimizing Machine Learning Programs"
http://hunch.net/?p=290 where in the comments at the bottom regarding
the third point "Avoid Pointer-Based Representations" there is talk of
unboxed arrays.
I think you may have misinterpreted this. As far as I can tell,
they're not contrasting "boxed arrays" and "unboxed arrays", but boxed
representations - typed objects, which point to each other - with
arrays.
I take the term "unboxed array-base implementations" to mean "unboxed
(i.e. array-based) implementations".
I haven't read the article in detail.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?
- Next by Date: Re: Compiling a C program through another C program
- Previous by thread: Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?
- Next by thread: Need help in Global variable in c
- Index(es):