Re: definition of stdio.h

Keith Thompson said:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

[...] Only an idiot would define printf and scanf in a
header.


[...] My (somewhat silly) point was simply that a non-idiot might
define printf and scanf in a header (though it must also be fully
defined elsewhwere).

Yes, you have made your point well. I must re-phrase my claim to take your
objection into account.

Only an idiot or a completely macro-crazed bozo would define printf and
scanf in a header.

:-)

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: definition of stdio.h
    ... define printf and scanf in a header (though it must also be fully ... Only an idiot or a completely macro-crazed bozo would define printf and ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: definition of stdio.h
    ... Ian Collins said: ... i want to see the definition of printf and scanf and where it is ... Only an idiot would define printf and scanf in a header. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: definition of stdio.h
    ... Richard Heathfield wrote: ... i want to see the definition of printf and scanf and where it is ... Only an idiot would define printf and scanf in a header. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: definition of stdio.h
    ... Richard Heathfield wrote: ... i want to see the definition of printf and scanf and where it is ... Since you yourself are not an idiot, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: definition of stdio.h
    ... i want to see the definition of printf and scanf and where it is ... Only an idiot would define printf and scanf in a header. ... variadic macros are up to the task.) ...
    (comp.lang.c)